Passed by the Senate February 21, 2003 YEAS 46   BRAD OWEN ________________________________________ President of the Senate Passed by the House April 8, 2003 YEAS 95   FRANK CHOPP ________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives | I, Milton H. Doumit, Jr., Secretary of the Senate of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SENATE BILL 5122 as passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives on the dates hereon set forth. MILTON H. DOUMIT JR. ________________________________________ Secretary | |
Approved April 17, 2003. GARY F. LOCKE ________________________________________ Governor of the State of Washington | April 17, 2003 - 2:23 p.m. Secretary of State State of Washington |
State of Washington | 58th Legislature | 2003 Regular Session |
Read first time 01/15/2003. Referred to Committee on Judiciary.
AN ACT Relating to trademark registration; amending RCW 19.77.010, 19.77.020, 19.77.050, 19.77.140, 19.77.150, and 19.77.160; adding a new section to chapter 19.77 RCW; and repealing RCW 19.77.110.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1 RCW 19.77.010 and 1994 c 60 s 6 are each amended to read
as follows:
((As used in)) The definitions in this section apply throughout
this chapter((:)) unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
(1) "Alien" when used with reference to a person means a person who
is not a citizen of the United States((;)).
(2) "Applicant" means the person filing an application for
registration of a trademark under this chapter, his or her legal
representatives, predecessors, successors, or assigns of record with
the secretary of state((;)).
(3) "Domestic" when used with reference to a person means a person
who is a citizen of the United States((;)).
(4) The term "colorable imitation" includes any mark which so
resembles a registered mark as to be likely to cause confusion or
mistake or to deceive((;)).
(5) A "counterfeit" is a spurious mark which is identical with, or
substantially indistinguishable from, a registered mark((;)).
(6) "Dilution" means the ((material reduction of the distinctive
quality of a famous mark)) lessening of the capacity of a famous mark
to identify and distinguish goods or services through use of a mark by
another person, regardless of the presence or absence of (a)
competition between the ((users of the mark)) owner of the famous mark
and other parties, or (b) likelihood of confusion, mistake, or
deception arising from that use((;)).
(7) "Person" means any individual, firm, partnership, corporation,
association, union, or other organization((;)) capable of suing and
being sued in a court of law.
(8) "Registered mark" means a trademark registered under this
chapter((;)).
(9) "Registrant" means the person to whom the registration of a
trademark under this chapter is issued, his or her legal
representatives, successors, or assigns of record with the secretary of
state((;)).
(10) "Trademark" or "mark" means any word, name, symbol, or device
or any combination thereof adopted and used by a person to identify
goods made or sold by him or her and to distinguish them from goods
made or sold by others, and any word, name, symbol, or device, or any
combination thereof, and any title, designation, slogan, character
name, and distinctive feature of radio or television programs, used by
a person in the sale or advertising of services to identify the
services ((of one person and)) provided by him or her and to
distinguish them from the services of others((;)).
(11) A trademark shall be deemed to be "used" in this state when it
is placed in the ordinary course of trade and not merely to reserve a
right in a mark in any manner on the goods or their containers, or on
tabs or labels affixed thereto, or displayed in connection with such
goods, and such goods are sold or otherwise distributed in this state,
or when it is used or displayed in the sale or advertising of services
rendered in this state((;)).
(12) "Trade name" ((shall have the same definition as under RCW
19.80.005(1);)) means any name used by a person to identify a business
or vocation of such a person.
(13) A mark shall be deemed to be "abandoned":
(a) When its use has been discontinued with intent not to resume
such use. Intent not to resume may be inferred from circumstances.
Nonuse for ((two)) three consecutive years shall be prima facie
evidence of abandonment; or
(b) When any course of conduct of the registrant, including acts of
omission as well as commission, causes the mark to become the generic
name for the goods or services or causes the mark to lose its
significance as an indication of source or origin. Purchaser
motivation shall not be a test for determining abandonment under this
subsection.
Sec. 2 RCW 19.77.020 and 1989 c 72 s 2 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) A trademark by which the goods or services of any applicant for
registration may be distinguished from the goods or services of others
shall not be registered if it:
(((1))) (a) Consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or
scandalous matter; or
(((2))) (b) Consists of or comprises matter which may disparage or
falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead,
institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt
or disrepute; or
(((3))) (c) Consists of or comprises the flag or coat of arms or
other insignia of the United States, or of any state or municipality,
or of any foreign nation, or any simulation thereof; or
(((4))) (d) Consists of or comprises the name, portrait, or
signature identifying a particular living individual who has not
consented in writing to its registration; or
(((5) Consists of a mark which,)) (e) Consists of or comprises a trademark which so resembles
a trademark registered in this state, or a trademark or trade name used
in this state by another prior to the date of the applicant's or
applicant's predecessor's first use in this state and not abandoned, as
to be likely, when applied to the goods or services of the applicant,
to cause confusion or mistake or to deceive.
(a) when applied to the goods or services of the applicant is
merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive of them, or
(b) when applied to the goods or services of the applicant is
primarily geographically descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive of
them, or
(c) is primarily merely a surname: PROVIDED, That nothing in this
subsection shall prevent the registration of a trademark used in this
state by the applicant which has become distinctive of the applicant's
goods or services. The secretary of state may accept as prima facie
evidence that the trademark has become distinctive, as used on or in
connection with the applicant's goods or services, proof of
substantially exclusive and continuous use thereof as a trademark by
the applicant in this state or elsewhere in the United States for the
five years next preceding the date of the filing of the application for
registration; or
(6)
(2) Registration under this title does not constitute prima facie
evidence that a mark is not merely descriptive, deceptively
misdescriptive, or geographically descriptive or deceptively
misdescriptive of the goods or services with which it is used, or is
not primarily merely a surname, unless the applicant has made
substantially exclusive and continuous use thereof as a trademark in
this state or elsewhere in the United States for the five years next
preceding the date of the filing of the application for registration.
(3) A trade name is not registrable under this chapter. However,
if a trade name also functions as a trademark, it is registrable as a
trademark.
(4) The secretary of state shall make a determination of
registerability by considering the application record and the marks
previously registered and subsisting under this chapter.
Sec. 3 RCW 19.77.050 and 1994 c 60 s 3 are each amended to read
as follows:
Registration of a trademark hereunder shall be effective for a term
of ((six)) five years from the date of registration. Upon application
filed within six months prior to the expiration of such term, on a form
to be furnished by the secretary of state requiring all the allegations
of an application for original registration, the registration may be
renewed for successive terms of ((six)) five years as to the goods or
services for which the trademark is still in use in this state. A
renewal fee as set by rule by the secretary of state, payable to the
secretary of state, shall accompany each application for renewal of the
registration.
The secretary of state shall notify registrants of trademarks
hereunder or their agents for service of record with the secretary of
state of the necessity of renewal within the year, but not less than
six months, next preceding the expiration of the unexpired original or
renewed term by writing to the last known address of the registrants or
their agents according to the files of the secretary of state. Neither
the secretary of state's failure to notify a registrant nor the
registrant's nonreceipt of a notice under this section shall extend the
term of a registration or excuse the registrant's failure to renew a
registration.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 4 A new section is added to chapter 19.77 RCW
to read as follows:
The secretary of state must adopt by rule a classification of goods
and services for convenience of administration of this chapter, but not
to limit or extend the applicant's or registrant's rights, and a single
application for registration of a mark may include any or all goods
upon which, or services with which, the mark is actually being used
indicating the appropriate class or classes of goods or services. When
a single application includes goods or services that fall within
multiple classes, the secretary of state may require payment of a fee
for each class. To the extent practical, the classification of goods
and services should conform to the classification adopted by the United
States patent and trademark office.
Sec. 5 RCW 19.77.140 and 1989 c 72 s 9 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) Subject to the provisions of RCW 19.77.900 any person who
shall:
(a) Use, without the consent of the registrant, any reproduction,
counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a trademark registered
under this chapter in connection with the sale, offering for sale, or
advertising of any goods or services on or in connection with which
such use is likely to cause confusion or mistake or to deceive as to
the source or origin of such goods or services; or
(b) Reproduce, counterfeit, copy or colorably imitate any such
trademark and apply such reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable
imitation to labels, signs, prints, packages, wrappers, receptacles, or
advertisements intended to be used upon or in connection with the sale
or other distribution of goods or services in this state on or in
connection with which such use is likely to cause confusion, or to
cause mistake, or to deceive as to the source or origin of such goods
or services
shall be liable to a civil action by the registrant for any or all of
the remedies provided in RCW 19.77.150, except that under (b) of this
subsection the registrant shall not be entitled to recover profits or
damages unless the acts have been committed with ((knowledge that such
imitation is intended to be used)) the intent to cause confusion or
mistake((,)) or to deceive.
(2) In determining whether, under this chapter, there is a
likelihood of confusion, mistake, or deception between marks when used
in association with goods or services, the court shall consider all
relevant factors, including, but not limited to the following:
(a) The similarity or dissimilarity of the marks in their
entireties to appearance, sound, meaning, connotation, and commercial
impression;
(b) The similarity or dissimilarity of the goods or services and
nature of the goods and services;
(c) The similarity or dissimilarity of trade channels;
(d) The conditions under which sales are made and buyers to whom
sales are made;
(e) The fame of the marks;
(f) The number and nature of similar marks in use on similar goods
or services;
(g) The nature and extent of any actual confusion;
(h) The length of time during and conditions under which there has
been concurrent use without evidence of actual confusion;
(i) The variety of goods or services on which each of the marks is
or is not used;
(j) The nature and extent of potential confusion, i.e., whether de
minimis or substantial;
(k) Any other established fact probative of the effect of use.
Sec. 6 RCW 19.77.150 and 1989 c 72 s 11 are each amended to read
as follows:
Any registrant may proceed by suit to enjoin the manufacture, use,
display, or sale of any counterfeits or colorable imitations of a
trademark registered under this chapter, and any court of competent
jurisdiction may grant an injunction to restrain such manufacture, use,
display, or sale as may be by the said court deemed just and
reasonable, and may require the defendants to pay to such registrant
all profits derived from and/or all damages suffered by reason of such
wrongful manufacture, use, display, or sale; and such court may also
order that any such counterfeits or colorable imitations in the
possession or under the control of any defendant in such case be
delivered to an officer of the court, or to the registrant, to be
destroyed. ((In exceptional cases the court may award to the
prevailing party the costs of the suit including reasonable attorneys'
fees.)) The court, in its discretion, may enter judgment awarding
reasonable attorneys' fees and/or an amount not to exceed three times
such profits and damages in such cases where the court finds the other
party committed the wrongful acts in bad faith or otherwise as
according to the circumstances of the case.
The enumeration of any right or remedy herein shall not affect a
registrant's right to prosecute under any penal law of this state.
Sec. 7 RCW 19.77.160 and 1989 c 72 s 10 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) The owner of a ((famous)) mark that is famous in this state
shall be entitled, subject to the principles of equity and upon such
terms as the court deems reasonable, to an injunction against another
person's commercial use in this state of a mark, commencing after the
mark becomes famous, which causes dilution of the distinctive quality
of the mark, and to obtain such other relief as is provided in this
section. In determining whether a mark is famous and has distinctive
quality, a court shall consider all relevant factors, including, but
not limited to the following:
(((1) Whether the mark is inherently distinctive or has become
distinctive through substantially exclusive and continuous use)) (a)
The degree or inherent or acquired distinctiveness of the mark in this
state;
(((2) Whether)) (b) The duration and extent of use of the mark
((are substantial)) in connection with the goods or services with which
the mark is used;
(((3) Whether)) (c) The duration and extent of advertising and
publicity of the mark ((are substantial)) in this state;
(((4) Whether)) (d) The geographical extent of the trading area in
which the mark is used ((is substantial));
(((5) Whether the mark has substantial renown in its and in the
other person's trading areas and channels of trade; and)) (e) The channels of trade for the goods or
services with which the mark is used;
(6) Whether substantial use of the same or similar marks is being
made by third parties
(f) The degree of recognition of the mark in the trading areas and
channels of trade in this state used by the mark's owner and the person
against whom the injunction is sought;
(g) The nature and extent of use of the same or similar marks by
third parties; and
(h) Whether the mark is the subject of state registration in this
state or United States registration.
(2) The owner shall be entitled only to injunctive relief in an
action brought under this section, unless the subsequent user willfully
intended to trade on the ((registrant's)) owner's reputation or to
cause dilution of the owner's mark. If such willful intent is proven,
the owner shall also be entitled to the remedies set forth in this
chapter, subject to the discretion of the court and the principles of
equity.
(3) The following are not actionable under this section:
(a) Fair use of a famous mark by another person in comparative
commercial advertising or promotion to identify competing goods or
services of the owner of the famous mark;
(b) Noncommercial use of a famous mark; and
(c) All forms of reporting and news commentary.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 8 RCW 19.77.110 (Classification of goods) and
1989 c 72 s 7 & 1955 c 211 s 11 are each repealed.