HOUSE BILL REPORT
SHB 1541
As Amended by the Senate
Title: An act relating to transportation innovative partnerships.
Brief Description: Enacting the Transportation Innovative Partnerships Act.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Transportation (originally sponsored by Representatives Murray, Woods, Wallace, Jarrett, Ericksen, Morris, B. Sullivan, Chase, Schual-Berke, Rodne and Dickerson).
Brief History:
Transportation: 2/3/05, 3/5/05 [DPS].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 3/15/05, 95-1.
Senate Amended.
Passed Senate: 4/12/05, 33-13.
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 25 members: Representatives Murray, Chair; Wallace, Vice Chair; Woods, Ranking Minority Member; Skinner, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Appleton, Buck, Campbell, Curtis, Dickerson, Ericksen, Hankins, Hudgins, Jarrett, Kilmer, Lovick, Morris, Nixon, Rodne, Sells, Shabro, Simpson, B. Sullivan, Takko, Upthegrove and Wood.
Staff: Jeff Doyle (786-7322).
Background:
The current public-private initiatives law (RCW 47.46) does not provide for any additional
projects. Out of six projects originally identified by the Department of Transportation for
development, the only project that has been undertaken is the Tacoma Narrows Bridge
project.
After a development agreement between the Department of Transportation and the private
developer had been signed, the Legislature analyzed the cost savings that could result from
state financing, and subsequently amended the law to provide for state financing.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
The Transportation Innovative Partnerships Act is created to enable the Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to enter into partnerships with private entities for
the development of transportation facilities. Projects eligible for development include road
and highway facilities, structures, operations, properties, vehicles, vessels, etc., representing
any mode of travel (except for recreational purposes). Projects that are not transportation
facilities, but that carry out public purposes or provide financing streams to a transportation
project, are also eligible for development.
The Transportation Commission is directed to conduct a statewide tolling feasibility study to
determine which state highways and facilities are viable candidates for development as a
public-private partnership. The results of the study must be presented to the Legislature by
January 15, 2006.
After conducting the feasibility study, the WSDOT may solicit proposals or may survey their
existing transportation project lists and plans to determine if any are suitable for development
as a public-private partnership. Beginning July 1, 2006, the WSDOT may also accept
unsolicited proposals. If an unsolicited proposal is received, the WSDOT must publish
notice of the proposal and provide 90 days to allow competing proposals to be submitted.
The WSDOT must enact rules for the proper acceptance, review, evaluation and selection of
projects. Once a project has been identified for development, the WSDOT may enter into
negotiations on an agreement. Some terms of the agreement are proscribed, such as the
payment of prevailing wages on the public works, and provisions for bonding and the
payment of workers and subcontractors. Other terms are required to be negotiated, such as
ownership of the asset to be developed, maintenance responsibilities, liability for the project,
etc.
Financing may be considered for all or part of a proposal, subject to certain conditions. For
projects owned, leased, used or operated by the state as a public facility, any bonded
indebtedness must be issued by the state treasurer. For other public projects that are not
transportation projects, financing must be approved by the state finance committee or, in the
case of federal tax exempt financing, by the public benefit corporation as specified in federal
law. For projects that are not public projects or public facilities, any lawful source of
financing may be used.
Sources of repayment may include user fees, tolls, fares, lease proceeds, gross or net receipts
from sales, proceeds from development rights, franchise fees, or any other lawful form of
consideration. Federal, state and local fund sources (such as grants, loans, or tax revenues)
may also be used for project financing.
A public involvement plan must be submitted and approved as part of any agreement. All
public meetings, workshops, open houses, hearings, etc., must be administered and attended
by representatives of the public sector partner, and may not be contracted out to the private
developer. For projects that cost in excess of $300 million, a citizen advisory committee
must be established for the purpose of reviewing, monitoring and advising on development of
the project and operations and maintenance of the project after construction is complete.
After a tentative development agreement has been reached, the WSDOT must publish the
proposed contract for 20 days, followed by a hearing to receive public comment. After
receiving public comment and approving a public involvement plan, the WSDOT may
execute the contract .
The Transportation Innovative Partnership Account (Account) is created in the state treasury,
as a depository for bond proceeds and any revenues generated from the transportation project.
Funds in the Account must be spent on the specific public-private project, and may not be
diverted to other transportation projects.
The WSDOT is directed to study alternative contracting and project management authorities
to seek out best practices as used by other states and the private sector. As part of the study,
the WSDOT must consider procedures for negotiating contracts in situations of a single
qualified bidder, in either solicited or unsolicited proposals. Finally, WSDOT must also
analyze methods of encouraging competition in the development of transportation projects.
A report must be submitted to the Governor and Legislature for consideration in the 2006
legislative session.
EFFECT OF SENATE AMENDMENT(S):
Clarifies that the Transportation Commission, rather than the DOT, must enact rules to
implement the program. Changes the date when DOT can accept unsolicited bids to January
1, 2007, instead of 2006. Authorizes DOT to enter into agreements with private entities for
the imposition of late-coming fees, to help apportion the cost of infrastructure improvements
among the beneficiaries of those improvements.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: Many other states are successfully developing projects under public-private
partnership programs. This state's current law (47.46) has proved unworkable, and this
legislation builds on the lessons learned in our prior experience. The ability to co-develop a
transportation project with another public project, such as affordable housing, is truly
innovative and could encourage true transit-oriented development.
Labor wants to be assured that the prevailing wage protections remain in place. Developers
want assurances that their financial information is not improperly disclosed to competitors.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: Doug MacDonald, Washington State Department of Transportation; Dick Page, Parsons Brinkerhoff; and Pamela Bailer-Campbell, Carter & Burgess.