HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1944
As Passed House:
March 4, 2005
Title: An act relating to raffles conducted by state employees.
Brief Description: Allowing raffles conducted by state employees.
Sponsors: By Representatives Hunt and Williams.
Brief History:
Commerce & Labor: 2/21/05, 2/23/05 [DP].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 3/4/05, 92-0.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE & LABOR
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Conway, Chair; Wood, Vice Chair; Condotta, Ranking Minority Member; Sump, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Crouse, Hudgins and McCoy.
Staff: Christopher Abbott (786-7119).
Background:
Raffles
Charitable organizations and nonprofit organizations may conduct raffles to raise funds for
the organization's stated purposes. The Gambling Commission (Commission) regulates
raffles and may issue rules governing licensing of organizations conducting raffles.
To qualify as an entity that may conduct raffles, the nonprofit organization must be organized
for one of the purposes authorized by statute, such as agricultural, educational, political,
athletic, fraternal, social, civic, or patriotic purposes. Additionally, the organization must
operate for 12 months prior to selling tickets, must show significant progress towards
achieving its purpose during those months, and have at least 15 voting members. The
Commission's rules list incorporated cities and towns, most Parent Teachers Association's,
and most student governments as qualifying nonprofit organizations. Credit unions are
specifically allowed, by statute, to conduct limited raffles.
The Commission authorizes three types of raffles:
Certain requirements apply to all raffles. For example, raffle tickets may not cost more than
$25 and the winner must be selected by a drawing unless the Commission gives special
permission for an alternate method. Additionally, organizers may not provide free tickets,
tickets sold on credit, or pay members for managing or operating the raffle. All proceeds
must go to the organization to support their charitable or other authorized purpose.
State Employee Ethics Limitations
The state Ethics in Public Service Act (Ethics Act) prohibits employees and officers of state
agencies from engaging in any activity that conflicts with the proper discharge of that
person's official duties or using public resources, including state-compensated time and
state-owned facilities, for private gain. The Executive Ethics Board (EEB) administers the
Ethics Act as applied to boards, commissions, higher education, and executive branch
agencies. The EEB may issue binding advisory opinions interpreting the Ethics Act.
The EEB rules allow state employees to engage in limited personal use of state resources if
the use is de minimis and does not conflict with performance of official duties. According to
an EEB advisory opinion, however, the de minimis exception does not apply to gambling.
The EEB reasoned that gambling activity, even if not specifically prohibited by statute,
necessarily undermines public confidence in government, at least when the agency lacks
specific statutory authorization.
The Ethics Act also limits solicitation of gifts and donations. State employees may not
accept or solicit anything of economic value if someone might reasonably expect that the
donation or gift would either influence the employee or reward that person for a previous
action. The statute, however, exempts solicitation for donations to the following: historic
furnishings in the capitol; promotion of tourism; the oral history, state library, and Archives
Account; the Legislative International Trade Account; and hosting the national legislative
association conference.
Summary of Bill:
Raffles
State agencies may conduct and participate in "members-only" raffles if they comply with
Gambling Commission rules and statutory requirements, including the following additional
conditions:
State Employee Ethics Limitations
A new exemption is added to the Ethics Act. State officers and employees may solicit
donations, gifts, and grants to support raffles for charitable or other authorized purposes.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: This bill was introduced because the Executive Ethics Board determined
that state employees may not conduct raffles for charity. Although other types of fundraisers
are permitted, these are often more time intensive, less successful, and more burdensome for
employees. Fundraisers strengthen morale and coworker collegiality while allowing state
employees to support worthy causes. In the past, employees have carefully vetted
organizations receiving donations. This is not gambling and should not be treated as such.
The Combined Fund Drive already allows similar activities.
(Neutral) A similar bill was passed several years ago that allowed credit unions to hold raffles
for charitable purposes, but the law does not permit state agencies to do the same.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Hunt, prime sponsor; Charlene Hunt,
Suzanne Magers, Donald Vaughan, and Terri Hall; and Bev Hermanson, Washington
Federation of State Employees.
(Neutral) Amy B. Hunter, Washington State Gambling Commission.