HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 2304
As Reported by House Committee On:
Appropriations
Title: An act relating to debts owed to the department of social and health services for medical assistance and recovery of those debts.
Brief Description: Recovering debts owed to the state for medical assistance.
Sponsors: Representatives Sommers, McCoy and Williams; by request of Office of Financial Management.
Brief History:
Appropriations: 3/28/05, 4/2/05 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 22 members: Representatives Sommers, Chair; Fromhold, Vice Chair; Buri, Clements, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Dunshee, Grant, Haigh, Hunter, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Linville, McDermott, McIntire, Miloscia, Priest, Schual-Berke, Talcott and Walsh.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 6 members: Representatives Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; McDonald, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Bailey, Hinkle and Pearson.
Staff: Bernard Dean (786-7130).
Background:
The Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) recovers the cost of publicly-funded
long-term care and medical assistance expenses from the estates of deceased clients who
received such services. In accordance with state and federal law, the DSHS is directed to
seek estate recovery from persons who received medical assistance after age 55. Recovery
may include placing liens on the property of a deceased recipient following the recipient's
death. In limited circumstances, federal law permits the DSHS to place liens against a
recipient's property prior to the recipient's death. Federal law requires deferral of recovery
under liens against a recipient's home under some circumstances, including when a surviving
spouse or minor or disabled child still lives in the home.
The DSHS cannot collect overpayments or other debts due to the DSHS six years after the
DSHS gives notice of such overpayments or debts.
A homestead, which is the property an owner uses as a residence, is exempted from
attachment, execution, and forced sale for the owner's debts up to $40,000. Judgments
against a homestead owner that are greater than $40,000 become liens on the value of the
homestead in excess of the homestead exemption.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
When an individual who holds a title to real property receives medical assistance, the DSHS
may file with the county clerk a request for a notice of transfer or encumbrance of the real
property. Title insurance companies or agents that discovers such a request when performing
a title search must disclose the request in a report preliminary to, or commitment to offer, title
insurance for the property. A person who transfers or encumbers the affected property must
notify the DSHS.
Consistent with federal law, the DSHS is directed to place liens on the property of a medical
assistance recipient prior to the recipient's death if the recipient is unlikely to be discharged
from a medical institution or return home.
A homestead exemption will not be available against an execution or forced sale to satisfy a
judgment obtained on debts owed to the state for the recovery of medical assistance costs.
The statute of limitations for enforcement of liens filed by the DSHS to recover medical
assistance costs is changed from six years to twenty years, and this time period begins to run
from the date the DSHS lien was recorded. The DSHS is directed to adopt rules providing
notice and hearing rights for the property owner when it files liens or requests for notice of
transfer or encumbrance.
The DSHS liens for recovery of medical assistance costs will be enforceable against a
decedent's life estate or joint tenancy interest in real property immediately prior to the
decedent's death.
The value of the life estate subject to the lien will be the value of the decedent's interest in the
property subject to the life estate immediately prior to the decedent's death. The value of the
joint tenancy interest subject to the lien will be the value of the decedent's fractional interest
the recipient would have owned in the jointly held interest in the property had the recipient
and the surviving joint tenants held title to the property as tenants in common on the date of
the recipient's death.
For liens against life estates or joint tenancy interests, the DSHS may not enforce the lien
either against a bona fide purchaser who obtains an interest in the property after the recipient
died but before the DSHS filed a lien or against a property right that vested before July 1,
2005.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The substitute bill removes the requirement that title insurance agents or companies notify the
DSHS when affected property is transferred or encumbered. For liens against life estates or
joint tenancy interests, the DSHS may not enforce the lien either against a bona fide
purchaser who obtains an interest in the property after the recipient died but before the DSHS
filed a lien or against a property right that vested before July 1, 2005. The DSHS must adopt
rules for notification of property owner when it files a lien or request for notice of transfer or
encumbrance. The substitute bill also makes a number of clarifying and technical changes.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on March 24, 2005.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: (Original bill) The Governor's budget and the Senate budget assume increased collections from estate recovery and provide increased resources for estate recovery. This legislation provides additional tools for the DSHS to achieve estate recovery. The DSHS will work with the title insurance industry to work out any differences. Better estate recovery will control the costs of medical assistance and lower the burden on the State General Fund.
Testimony Against: (Original bill) Better estate recovery is a good goal, but this is the wrong path to the solution. A request for notification of encumbrance is not a lien, and section 2 of the bill inappropriately places the burden of notifying DSHS on title insurance companies. In addition, this bill may operate as an unconstitutional taking by impairing vested real property rights of non-debtors. We would like to work with the DSHS to improve the bill.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Jonathan Eames, Washington Health Care Association and
Washington Center for Assisted Living; and Stan Marshburn, Department of Social and
Health Services.
(Opposed) Dwight Bickel, Washington Land Title Association.