HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 2681
As Passed House:
February 11, 2006
Title: An act relating to minimum contribution rates for the public employees' retirement system, the public safety employees' retirement system, the school employees' retirement system, and the teachers' retirement system.
Brief Description: Establishing minimum contribution rates for the public employees' retirement system, the public safety employees' retirement system, the school employees' retirement system, and the teachers' retirement system.
Sponsors: By Representatives Conway, Fromhold, Lovick, Green, Sells, Kenney, Quall, Simpson, Moeller and Morrell; by request of Select Committee on Pension Policy.
Brief History:
Appropriations: 1/18/06, 1/23/06 [DP].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 2/11/06, 97-0.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 27 members: Representatives Sommers, Chair; Fromhold, Vice Chair; Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; McDonald, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Armstrong, Bailey, Buri, Chandler, Clements, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Dunshee, Haigh, Hunter, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, McDermott, McIntire, Miloscia, Pearson, Priest, Schual-Berke, P. Sullivan, Talcott and Walsh.
Staff: David Pringle (786-7310).
Background:
Each year, the Office of the State Actuary conducts an actuarial valuation of each system and
plan in the Washington retirement systems. The primary purpose of the actuarial valuation is
to determine the required contribution rates that each plan and system require, but the
valuations also provide detailed analysis of member and retiree demographics, and of
changes in benefit obligations and fund values.
The choice of an actuarial funding method determines the way pension contributions will be
allocated across members' working careers. The portion of the present value of a pension that
is allocated to a particular period of a member's career, most typically an annual period, is
referred to in actuarial practice as the "normal cost." The total cost of a pension is
determined by the benefits paid out less the returns on investment of fund assets. All
standard actuarial funding methods are designed to completely fund a member's retirement
benefit before retirement, though they may allocate different portions of the total cost to
different periods of a member's career.
The current actuarial funding method used for Plans 2 and 3 of the Public Employees'
Retirement System (PERS), the Teachers' Retirement System (TRS), and the School
Employees' Retirement System (SERS) is the aggregate funding method. Under the
aggregate method, normal or annual costs are equal to the difference between the present
value of all future benefits to be paid out less current assets. This difference (the cost) is
spread as a level percentage of members' future pay.
The "entry age normal cost method" is another standard actuarial funding method that
determines the cost of funding an individual member's benefit from the time of entry into the
system, calculated to be a level percentage of pay throughout a member's career. This
method may be used to determine the cost of a plan's benefit structure, regardless of the
amount of assets in the plan prior to a member's entry.
The current funding method used for PERS and TRS Plan 1 is tailored to address
amortization of the unfunded accrued actuarial liabilities (UAAL) of the Plans 1 by June 30,
2024, and to spread the cost of repaying the unfunded liabilities to all employers of members
of PERS, TRS, SERS, and after July 1, 2006, the Public Safety Employees' Retirement
System. The Legislature suspended contributions towards amortizing the Plans 1 UAAL
during the 2003-05 and 2005-07 fiscal biennia. These suspensions resulted in an increase in
the actuarially-required contribution rates necessary to fully amortize the UAAL over the
remaining years until June 30, 2024.
Pension fund assets are valued on an actuarial basis, rather than a market value basis, to
reduce the instability in contribution rates year-to-year. The 2003 Legislature enacted
Engrossed House Bill 2254 (Chapter 11, Laws of 2003), which instituted a new method of
averaging, or smoothing, gains or losses over a period of time that varies up to eight years.
The length of time over which a given year's gains or losses are smoothed is dependent on the
amount of variation of a year's investment return from the long-term rate. Prior to 2003, the
actuarial value of assets was required to recognize changes to asset values that vary from the
long-term investment rate of return assumption over a four year period. The assumed
long-term investment rate of return is 8 percent per year.
Over periods where the return on assets consistently either fail to meet or exceed the expected
rates, the actuarial value of assets could produce contribution rates that are either significantly
above or below the long-term cost of the retirement plans. During the 1990's, investment
returns substantially in excess of expected rates of return and adjustments to assumptions
about future rates of return caused the actuarial valuations to indicate contribution rates
significantly below the long-term expected rates. Contribution rates rose significantly
between the 2003-05 fiscal biennia and the 2005-07 fiscal biennia, and current projections by
the State Actuary indicate further substantial increases towards the long-term expected rates
during the next two fiscal biennia.
Summary of Bill:
Minimum employer contribution rates are established for amortizing the UAAL beginning
July 1, 2009, for PERS Plan 1 at 2.68 percent, and beginning September 1, 2009 for TRS
Plan 1 at 4.71 percent. These minimum contribution rates remain in effect until the actuarial
value of assets in either PERS Plan 1 or TRS Plan 1 equal 125 percent of actuarial liabilities,
or June 30, 2024, whichever comes first.
A process for determining minimum contribution rates for employers and employees in
PERS, TRS, and SERS Plans 2 and 3 is established. The contribution rate for the normal
cost portion of these Plans 2 and 3 is set at 80 percent of employer or employee normal cost
calculated under the entry age normal cost method.
Upon completion of each biennial actuarial valuation, the State Actuary shall review the
appropriateness of the minimum contribution rates and recommend changes to the
Legislature, if needed.
The term "normal cost" is defined as the portion of the cost of benefits allocated to a period
of time under the actuarial method, typically twelve months.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 12, 2006.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect on July 1, 2009.
Testimony For: This bill is a major goal for the retirement systems. Our contribution rates went down and down in recent years, and many of us wanted to keep them higher. In 2001, our retirement plans were almost fully funded but we let the rates fall and now are facing substantial unfunded liabilities again. This bill works towards the goal of not letting this happen again.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: Representative Conway, Prime Sponsor.