HOUSE BILL REPORT
HJM 4031
As Passed Legislature
Brief Description: Preserving section 5 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act to protect Puget Sound.
Sponsors: By Representatives Appleton, B. Sullivan, Green, Takko, McCoy, Hunt, Darneille, Flannigan, Kessler, Chase, Eickmeyer, Morris, McIntire, Murray, Woods, O'Brien, Ericks, Pettigrew, Moeller, Dunshee, Lantz, Schual-Berke, Lovick, Morrell, Kenney, Clibborn, Sommers, Walsh, Strow, Haler, Talcott, Jarrett, Wallace, Dickerson, Conway, P. Sullivan, Hasegawa, Upthegrove, Rodne, Hankins, Williams, Springer, Cody, McDermott, Sells, Miloscia, Kagi, Campbell, Simpson, Roberts and Kilmer.
Brief History:
Natural Resources, Ecology & Parks: 1/20/06 [DP].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 2/13/06, 86-12.
Passed Senate: 3/2/06, 37-8.
Passed Legislature.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES, ECOLOGY & PARKS
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 10 members: Representatives B. Sullivan, Chair; Upthegrove, Vice Chair; Buck, Ranking Minority Member; Kretz, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Blake, Dickerson, Eickmeyer, Hunt, Kagi and Orcutt.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 1 member: Representative Chandler.
Staff: Jeff Olsen (786-7157).
Background:
Congress enacted the Marine Mammal Protection Act in 1972 in response to concerns that
some marine mammal species may be in danger of extinction as a result of human activities,
and that species should not be permitted to fall below sustainable population levels.
Section 5 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act contains findings that the navigable waters
in Puget Sound are a fragile and important national asset. It further finds that increased oil
tanker traffic is a threat to those waters and shorelines, and tanker traffic restrictions are
necessary to protect Puget Sound. After October 18, 1977, Section 5 also restricted the
federal government from approving permits for any facility in Puget Sound east of Port
Angeles that would result in any increase in crude oil being handled at that facility. The
restriction allows for increases in oil that is refined for consumption in Washington.
On November 8, 2005, S.1977 was introduced in the Senate of the United States that would
repeal Section 5 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act.
Summary of Bill:
The President of the United States, Congress, and the Secretary of the U.S. Department of
Commerce are petitioned to preserve Section 5 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act to
continue protecting Puget Sound by limiting tanker traffic. The joint memorial includes the
following findings:
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Testimony For: Puget Sound is on the verge of a collapse, and a major oil spill would be
devastating. Currently, Puget Sound is home to 40 species on threatened and endangered
species lists, including the orca. Preserving Section 5 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act
protects Puget Sound into the future by limiting tanker traffic. Oil spills are the largest single
threat to the health of Puget Sound. Tourism is an important component of the economy for
the Olympic Peninsula, and the area would be greatly affected by a major oil spill. Protection
of Puget Sound preserves treaty protected resources. Washington should have control over
the protection of its resources.
(With concerns) The current challenges to the Magnuson Amendment have been raised due
to recent litigation. The findings in the resolution should reflect that tanker traffic has
increased and that Section 5 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act has not been enforced.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Appleton, prime sponsor; Kathy Fletcher,
People for Puget Sound; Mike Doherty, Board of Clallam County Commissioners; Stephen
Robinson, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission; Jerry Joyce, Audubon Society; Dale
Jensen, Department of Ecology; John Dohrmann, Puget Sound Action Team; and Jim Davis,
Olympic Coast Alliance.
(With concerns) Fred Felleman, Ocean Advocates.