HOUSE BILL REPORT
SSB 6234
As Reported by House Committee On:
Financial Institutions & Insurance
Title: An act relating to insurance fraud.
Brief Description: Creating the insurance fraud program.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Financial Institutions, Housing & Consumer Protection (originally sponsored by Senators Fairley, Keiser, Spanel and Esser; by request of Insurance Commissioner).
Brief History:
Financial Institutions & Insurance: 2/21/06 [DPA].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill (As Amended by House Committee) |
|
|
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS & INSURANCE
Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 11 members: Representatives Kirby, Chair; Ericks, Vice Chair; Roach, Ranking Minority Member; Tom, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Newhouse, O'Brien, Santos, Serben, Simpson, Strow and Williams.
Staff: Jon Hedegard (786-7127).
Background:
Fraud against insurers is a crime. Acts of alleged fraud may be investigated by state and local
law enforcement. Acts of alleged fraud may be prosecuted by county prosecutors or the
Attorney General.
Insurers may investigate suspicious claims. Generally, property and casualty insurers must
file an insurance anti-fraud plan with the Insurance Commissioner (Commissioner) that
establishes specific procedures to:
The Commissioner must notify an insurer if a plan is not approved. The Commissioner may
audit an insurer to determine if the insurer is in compliance with the plan. An insurer may be
fined if they are not in compliance. Annually, insurers must submit a summary report on
actions taken under its anti-fraud plan to prevent and combat insurance fraud.
An anti-fraud plan and the summary of the insurer's anti-fraud activities are not public
records and are exempt from public disclosure. The plans and summary are not discoverable
or admissible in civil litigation.
Summary of Amended Bill:
The bill adds definitions of "insurance fraud" and "insurer."
The bill creates an insurance fraud program within the Office of the Insurance Commissioner
(OIC). The fraud program is funded from the Insurance Commissioner's Regulatory
Account.
Staffing.
The Chief of the Fraud Program is a full-time position appointed by the Commissioner. The
Commissioner may employ staff in the insurance fraud program. Staff levels for this
program shall not exceed eight full-time equivalents until June 30, 2010. The Commissioner
may also use funds in the insurance fraud program budget to:
Authority under the program.
The Commissioner may:
Requirement to disclose - licensees.
When a licensee of the Commissioner has a reasonable belief that an act of insurance fraud
will be, is being, or has been committed, the licensee must disclose the information to the
Commissioner, the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB), or the National Association of
Insurance Commissioners (NAIC).
Ability to disclose - any person.
Any person who has a reasonable belief that an act of insurance fraud will be, is being, or has
been committed, may disclose information to the Commissioner or to the representative of an
insurer that requests the information for the purpose of detecting, prosecuting, or preventing
insurance fraud.
Immunity.
A licensee or any other person who discloses information to the Commissioner, the NICB,
the NAIC, or law enforcement agency is immune from liability in any civil or criminal action
suit, or prosecution unless actual malice on the part of the licensee or other person can be
shown.
Confidentiality.
There are categories of information that are exempt from public disclosure including:
The Commissioner may share the documents, materials and other information with:
Penalties.
In a criminal prosecution where the insurance company is a victim, a court may consider the
insurer a victim for the purpose of ordering restitution as part of a criminal penalty.
Insurance application and claim form disclosure.
Within six months of the effective date of the section, all application for insurance and all
claims forms must include a notice that includes a statement that it is a crime to provide false,
incomplete, or misleading information to an insurer for the purposes of defrauding the
insurer.
The lack of the notice is not a defense to any criminal or civil action.
Insurance Fraud Advisory Board.
The Commissioner must appoint an Insurance Fraud Advisory Board (Board) to advise the
Commissioner upon the effectiveness and the resources allocated to the program. The Board
members serve staggered terms and receive no compensation. The Board consists of 10
members and is composed as follows:
Report.
The Commissioner must report annually on the activities of the fraud program. The report
must be submitted to the Legislature by March 1 of each year. The report must include at
least the number of cases reported to the Commissioner, number of cases referred for
prosecution, the number of convictions, and the amount of money recovered
Rules.
The Commissioner may adopt rules to implement and administer the act.
The OIC is named as a limited authority Washington law enforcement agency.
Fraud program investigators who are certified as peace officers under RCW 43.101.095 have
the powers and status of a limited Washington peace officer.
Amended Bill Compared to Substitute Bill:
An additional insurer member is added to the advisory board. The confidentiality provisions
are amended to track the existing law enforcement exemptions to disclosure. The application
of the confidentiality provisions is limited to the fraud program within the Office of the
Insurance Commissioner.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Availible.
Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill takes effect on July 1, 2006.
Testimony For: (In support) Forty-one states have dedicated fraud units. The
overwhelming majority of those are located in the insurance department of each state.
Insurance fraud is complex area, and the insurance regulator has the necessary expertise to
address the subject. It keeps the focus of the program on insurance fraud and also provides
more accountability since the program is funded out of the Insurance Regulatory Account.
The OIC started working with industry on this issue about six months ago. At this time, we
think we have some useful amendments that will alleviate the concerns of some parties.
There is an amendment on confidentiality that parallels existing confidentiality provisions for
law enforcement agencies. There is another amendment that adds an additional insurer
member to the advisory board which addresses insurer concerns about board composition.
There are additional factors that address the subject of accountability. An annual report is
required. There will be a major review of the program in 2010. The program is designed to
start small and be built over time. This new program will send a message that Washington is
serious about combating insurance fraud. Generally, we need more cops and enforcement,
not more laws. This bill moves toward that goal. Please pass the bill. If there are some
adjustments that are needed, the bill has ample oversight, and there will be opportunities to
make minor adjustments in the future.
(In support with amendment) Industry supports the bill if amendments are adopted. Industry
certainly supports the idea of a fraud bureau. One of the amendments addresses
confidentiality. That is a very important subject for the industry. The proposed language
closely tracks existing Public Disclosure Act language regarding law enforcement. We
believe that is a very appropriate standard. Industry supports the change to the advisory
board. If those amendments are adopted, industry supports the bill. We support the bill but
have an issue that is easily resolved. It did not come to our attention until now, and we
apologize for the late notice. On page 2, line 4 of the bill there is language that refers to false
information presented to or by an insurer, broker, or agent. We think "or by" is mistakenly
included. It may conflict with other language in the bill. It could put a carrier into jeopardy
if someone is inadvertently rated incorrectly. The sentence stands-alone without the "or by"
language. Please consider removing those words as we go forward. The confidentiality
amendment is very important. Industry has discussed whether the NAIC language in the
original bill was preferable to the current language. We now agree that the law enforcement
model that exists in Washington today is the best way to go. We support the bill. There are
numerous proposed amendments, and we are still working through those suggested changes.
We appreciate the hard work on the confidentiality language. We do think a clarifying
amendment may be useful. The language seems to include the entire OIC. It might be more
appropriate to limit it to the fraud program within the OIC. You can contemplate that as we
go forward. An additional issue in the underlying bill is the possible need for language to
allow a person to testify about matters. We support the bill if the confidentiality amendment
is included. We suggest to change the organization of the bill so that the public records
exemption is not listed out. Consider the OIC a law enforcement agency for the purposes of
the bill. That may be a cleaner way to address the same subject.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Mike Kreidler, Office of the Insurance Commissioner; and
Bill Hanson, Washington Council of Police and Sheriffs.
(In support with amendment) Mel Sorenson, Allstate and Property and Casualty Insurers;
Jean Leonard, State Farm and Washington Insurers; Carrie Tellefson, Progressive Insurers;
Larry Shannon, Washington State Trial Lawyers; Rowland Thompson, Allied Daily
Newspapers; and Cliff Webster, American Insurance Association.