Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Judiciary Committee | |
HB 1150
Title: An act relating to dangerous or potentially dangerous dogs.
Brief Description: Changing provisions relating to dangerous dogs.
Sponsors: Representatives Kirby, Campbell, Simpson and Murray.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 1/26/05
Staff: Edie Adams (786-7180).
Background:
Dangerous dogs and potentially dangerous dogs are regulated under state law and may also be
regulated under local law. A dangerous dog is one that: (1) Inflicts severe injury on a human
without provocation; (2) kills a domestic animal while off the owner's property; or (3) is already
declared a potentially dangerous dog due to injury to a human, and again bites, attacks, or
endangers the safety of humans. A dog cannot be declared dangerous for inflicting an injury to a
person who was committing a tort on the owner's premises, tormenting the dog, or committing a
crime.
A potentially dangerous dog is one that, when unprovoked: (1) Bites a human or domestic
animal; (2) chases a person in public or approaches a person in public in a menacing fashion; or
(3) has a known propensity to attack, cause injury, or threaten the safety of humans or domestic
animals. Potentially dangerous dogs are regulated only at the local level.
State law requires owners to register dangerous dogs and imposes a number of other
requirements on owners of dangerous dogs. These requirements include a proper enclosure for
confining the dangerous dog, adequate posted warnings on the premises, and a surety bond or
liability insurance of at least $250,000 insuring the owner for any personal injuries inflicted by
the dangerous dog.
A local government may impose additional restrictions on dangerous dogs, including not
allowing the possession of dangerous dogs within its jurisdiction.
Summary of Bill:
The breed of a dog cannot be used as a factor to declare a dog potentially dangerous or
dangerous.
A dog cannot be declared potentially dangerous based on the dog threatening or injuring a person
who at the time was: 1) committing a tort upon the premises of the dog's owner; 2) tormenting,
abusing, or assaulting the dog, or had done so in the past; or 3) committing or attempting to
commit a crime.
The amount of the surety bond or liability insurance that must be obtained by the owner of a
dangerous dog is reduced to $100,000.
Wolf-dog hybrids are considered "dogs" for the purposes of the dangerous dog chapter.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.