Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Technology, Energy & Communications Committee | |
HB 1474
Brief Description: Clarifying Initiative 297.
Sponsors: Representatives B. Sullivan, Nixon, Schual-Berke, Jarrett, O'Brien, Dickerson, Upthegrove, Eickmeyer, Hinkle, Quall, McIntire, Tom, Appleton, Hunt, Moeller, Simpson, Grant, Hunter, Kilmer and Chase.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/11/05
Staff: Sarah Dylag (786-7109).
Background:
Initiative 297, known as the Cleanup Priority Act (Act), approved by the voters on November 2,
2004, prohibits additional mixed radioactive and hazardous waste from being brought to sites,
such as the Hanford Nuclear reservation, until the existing on-site waste conforms to all state and
federal environmental laws. New requirements were established for sites and facilities that
handle mixed radioactive and hazardous waste. The Act also increased grant funding to help the
public and local governments evaluate permit, closure, and cleanup decisions and to review
funding priorities.
On December 1, 2004, the federal government filed a complaint in Federal District Court seeking
to have the Act declared invalid on a number of grounds, including that it is discriminatory under
the Commerce Clause, that it is in violation of the Supremacy Clause, and that the United States
has not waived sovereign immunity as it relates to the control of hazardous or solid waste.
As part of its response to the federal government's challenge, the state requested the federal court
to refer questions of interpretation to the Washington State Supreme Court. The Federal District
Court, on February 8, 2005, referred several questions of the Act's interpretation to the
Washington Supreme Court.
Summary of Bill:
Findings
In relation to Initiative 297, the Legislature makes the following findings:
The Legislature also finds and clarifies that the act did not intend:
Definitions
The terms "mixed waste" or "mixed radioactive and hazardous waste" are clarified. A new
exclusion is added to the definition to ensure medical isotopes and materials are not included.
The definition also does not include waste or facilities regulated under the Federal Atomic
Energy Act.
The "mixed waste surcharge" definition is clarified. The surcharge is not assessed on the basis of
budgets for a facility or site where such funding, or portion thereof, is not appropriated.
New Facilities
New land disposal facilities may be permitted by the department to accomplish the closure,
remediation, or cleanup of facilities or units at a site, if there are releases or suspected releases of
hazardous substances at the site that are not investigated and being controlled under current law.
These new facilities may only have a disposal capacity that is necessary to accomplish the
closure, remediation, or cleanup at that site.
Intent
The intent of the Act is restated. The Department of Ecology is directed to implement the Act's
policy under the authorities granted in the Hazardous Waste Management Act, the Model Toxics
Control Act, and the State Environmental Policy Act. The department must adopt rules to
implement this intent.
Miscellaneous
A severability clause is added.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.