Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Natural Resources, Ecology & Parks Committee | |
HB 1692
Brief Description: Concerning the management of forest lands by counties.
Sponsors: Representatives Orcutt, Blake, Kretz, DeBolt, Schindler, Condotta, Buck and Takko.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/18/05
Staff: Jason Callahan (786-7117).
Background:
State management of trust lands
The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) manages approximately four million acres of forest
land in the state for the financial benefit of various trust beneficiaries. These beneficiaries, which
include common schools, the university system, and the state's capitol building programs, all
have specific acres of land that are managed for their specific benefit.
Among the state's managed acres are over 540,000 acres known as Forest Board Transfer Lands.
These acres are spread out over 20 counties, and the revenue generated from leasing and the
removal of valuable materials from the Transfer Lands are dedicated to the county in which the
lands are located.
A brief history of Forest Board Transfer Lands
Unlike the majority of uplands held in trust by the state, the Forest Board Transfer Lands were
not granted to the state's ownership by the U.S. Congress upon statehood. Forest Board Transfer
Lands represent land that came into public ownership primary by way of tax foreclosures. When
a county acquires a forested parcel through a tax lien foreclosure, the DNR may demand that the
county deed title to the property to the state if it satisfies certain requirements. Once the land is
deeded to state ownership, it then becomes part of the Forest Board Transfer Lands, and is held
in trust and managed to the benefit of that county.
Forest Board Transfer Lands revenue distribution
When revenue is generated from Forest Board Transfer Lands, the DNR retains an amount to
reimburse it for the expense incurred by the state for the administration, reforestation, and
protection of the land. This amount is set by the Board of Natural Resources, and may not
exceed 25 percent.
The money remaining after the reimbursement to the state is then paid to the appropriate county.
Except for Skamania County and Wahkiakum County, the money must be distributed to the
taxing districts within that county in the same manner as all general taxes are distributed. This
includes a portion that is dedicated to the state general fund, which functions as a taxing district.
In Skamania County and Wahkiakum County, as a result of their population being under 16,000
residents, the revenue from Forest Board Transfer Lands must first be used towards a reduction
of any indebtedness in the current expense fund of the county.
Summary of Bill:
Land back to counties
Any county that has deeded land to the state to be held in trust and managed by the DNR as part
of the Forest Board Transfer Lands may request the DNR to deed that land back to the county
during time windows established by the DNR. At a minimum, the DNR must allow counties to
request the property transfer at least 30 days each biennium.
County management responsibilities and options
Once transferred back the county, the county will assume full legal title and complete
administrative and management responsibilities. The county would be prohibited from selling
the land, and would be required to manage the land for maximum sustained profit as a working
forest. The county would have the ability to choose the management process that is deemed by
the county to be the most effective. The options available to the county include using county
employees to manage the land, contracting with private foresters, or partnering with other
counties to jointly manage the land.
If a county chooses to have Forest Board Transfer Lands deeded back to county ownership, that
county would have the authority to deny future DNR requests to have land deeded to the state.
The county would, however, have the option of deeding the land back to the state at any time, or
contracting with the DNR to have the state manage the land on behalf of the county.
Revenue distribution
Revenue generated by the county from the management of the land would be paid in the same
manner as general taxes are distributed to the local taxing districts. However, the portion of
general taxes that would be paid to the state general fund must be instead redistributed
proportionally among the other taxing districts.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on 2/8/05.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.