Washington State House of Representatives |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Transportation Committee | |
HB 1989
Brief Description: Providing local transportation funding options.
Sponsors: Representatives Upthegrove, Jarrett, Moeller, Wood, Hankins, Murray, Appleton, B. Sullivan, Dickerson, Simpson, Lovick, Pettigrew and O'Brien.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/23/05
Staff: Jerry Long (786-7306).
Background:
In 1990, the Legislature authorized local option taxes for transportation purposes. The options
included: a local option fuel tax (10% of state rate); a vehicle license fee (up to $15); commercial
parking tax (no fixed rate); a street utility charge (up to $2 per employee or household); an
employer tax (up to $2 per employee); a motor vehicle excise tax (MVET) for high occupancy
vehicle lanes (up to 15% of state base rate); an MVET for high capacity transportation systems
(.8% of vehicle value); and, a sales and use tax for high capacity transportation systems (1% of
purchase price).
In 1995 the Washington Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of the city street utility
charge in Covell v. City of Seattle. The court concluded that the street utility charge was not a
valid fee, but rather a tax on property that violated the state constitution's uniformity clause.
On November 5, 2002, I-776 repealed the local option vehicle license fee and the MVET for high
capacity transportation systems.
Summary of Bill:
The following local option taxes are authorized:
Annual Vehicle Fee
A county, city or town may impose by ordinance an annual vehicle fee for transportation
purposes as follows:
Annual Roadway Fee
A county, city or town may impose by ordinance weight fees of one and half cents per pound
based on vehicle empty scale weight for transportation purposes.
Both fees (vehicle and roadway) are to be collected at the time of vehicle license renewal. The
county, city or town imposing the fees will contract with the Department of Licensing and all
costs incurred will be reimbursed by the imposing entity. Both fees apply to cars, sport utility
vehicles, motorcycles, motorhomes, trailers with a scale weight of over 1,000 pounds, and trucks
10,000 pounds or less. Vehicles not included are permanent plated trailers, commercial trailers,
vehicles bearing Taipei Economic and Cultural Office special plates, campers, farm equipment,
trucks over 10,000 pounds scale weight, and small trailers under 1,000 pounds scale weight.
A city or town cannot impose a fee that, if combined with the county fee, exceeds the total
amount authorized. If the combined county and city or town fee exceeds the maximum
authorized, then the city or town must reduce their fee. If the fee is county wide, the distributions
to the county cities and towns must be based on the number of registered vehicles.
Certain exemptions from both fees are authorized including persons with a physical disability
and persons at least sixty two years old with a household income less than an amount set by the
county, city or town.
The ordinance effective date will be delayed for at least six months after the ordinance is enacted
or upon initiating an exemption process.
Revenues generated from both fees shall be used for transportation purposes only, including, but
not limited to, the operation and preservation of roads, streets and other transportation
improvements; new construction, reconstruction, and expansion of city streets, county roads, and
state highways and other transportation improvements; development and implementation of
public transportation and high capacity transit improvements and programs; and planning,
design, and acquisition of right of way and site for such transportation purposes.
Local Option Fuel Tax
The existing local option fuel tax used for highway purposes is increased from ten percent to
twenty percent of the statewide fuel tax rate.
Street Utility Service Fee
Cities and towns are authorized to establish street utility service areas for the purpose of
regulating, maintaining and preserving city streets. After providing proper notice and conducting
public hearings, the legislative authority of a city or town may establish such street utility service
areas by ordinance. Maintenance and preservation of the street utility would be supported
through periodic user fees in an annual amount of up to fifty percent of the actual costs for
maintenance, operation and preservation of facilities and charged to residential and business
users located in the service area. User fees must be expressed as a dollar amount per household
unit or type of business. In classifying user fee rates, the city or town may consider several
factors, including: cost to maintain current level of service for the street utility; estimated number
of vehicle trips generated by certain types of properties; and, location of users. User fees may not
be imposed on vacant parcels. If a party can demonstrate that it neither benefits from a street nor
creates a burden on the street, no user fee shall be charged. User fees may not be computed on an
ad valorem basis. Street utility service user fee revenues must be placed in a segregated fund and
used only for specified purposes, including street maintenance and repair, preservation,
rehabilitation or reconstruction, traffic signals, lighting, signs and markers, striping, street
sweeping, guardrails, barriers, roadway vegetation, channelization devices, snow and ice
removal, planning, and other operational activities in support of the transportation system,
including administration of the street utility. Jurisdictions that create a street utility may also use
any other lawful means of financing street improvements.
A city or town with an established street utility service area may impose a lien for any delinquent
user fees where a property owner has been billed as delinquent for at least two months and at
least two billing notices have been mailed explaining that a lien may be placed. The lien does
not have to be recorded to be valid, will be attached to the street user's address, and may be
foreclosed the same way as sewerage service.
A street utility authority may be dissolved if it is found to be in the best interest of the public.
All unexpended funds of a dissolved street utility authority must be used for the purposes
permitted for the street utility.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill contains multiple effective dates. Sections 1 through 3 is effective
January 1, 2006 and sections 4 through 18 of the bill take effect August 1, 2005.