HOUSE BILL REPORT
ESSB 5385
As Passed House - Amended:
March 2, 2006
Title: An act relating to creating an invasive species council.
Brief Description: Creating the Washington invasive species council.
Sponsors: By Senate Committee on Natural Resources, Ocean & Recreation (originally sponsored by Senators Jacobsen, Oke, Fraser, Swecker and Kline).
Brief History:
Natural Resources, Ecology & Parks: 2/17/06, 2/21/06 [DPA];
Appropriations: 2/23/06 [DPA(NREP)].
Floor Activity:
Passed House - Amended: 3/2/06, 90-7.
Brief Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill (As Amended by House) |
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES, ECOLOGY & PARKS
Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 8 members: Representatives B. Sullivan, Chair; Upthegrove, Vice Chair; Buck, Ranking Minority Member; Blake, Chandler, Dickerson, Hunt and Kagi.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 2 members: Representatives Kretz, Assistant Ranking Minority Member and Orcutt.
Staff: Jason Callahan (786-7117).
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Majority Report: Do pass as amended by Committee on Natural Resources, Ecology & Parks. Signed by 20 members: Representatives Sommers, Chair; Fromhold, Vice Chair; Anderson, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; McDonald, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Cody, Conway, Darneille, Dunshee, Haigh, Hunter, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, McDermott, McIntire, Miloscia, Priest, Schual-Berke, P. Sullivan and Talcott.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 6 members: Representatives Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Buri, Clements, Hinkle, Pearson and Walsh.
Staff: Alicia Paatsch (786-7178).
Background:
Invasive species are generally considered to be animal or plant species that are thriving in a
geographical area to which they are not native. Washington has a number of programs to
manage invasive species. Many of these programs are tailored for a specific purpose. For
instance, there are programs designed to manage invasive upland plant species such as wild
chervil, aquatic plant species such as spartina and purple loosestrife, as well as aquatic animal
species such as zebra mussels. The programs are generally run by the state agency with
expertise in the environment or industry in which the invasive species operates or the
pathway through which future invasive species could arrive.
Summary of Amended Bill:
Creation of the Washington Invasive Species Council
The Washington Invasive Species Council (Council) is created within the Interagency
Committee for Outdoor Recreation, until the end of 2011, to provide policy level direction,
planning, and coordination for combating harmful invasive species. For the purposes of the
Council's scope, invasive species include non-native organisms that cause economic or
environmental harm and are capable of spreading to new areas of the state.
Council Composition
The Council is to be composed of representatives of six state agencies and two
representatives of county government. The agencies represented are the Departments of
Agriculture, Transportation, Fish and Wildlife, Ecology, and Natural Resources, along with
the State Noxious Weed Control Board. The members of the Council may vote to increase
the membership at any time. In addition, representatives from the federal government must
be invited to participate in a non-voting capacity. Federal participants must represent the
U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, and the U.S. Coast Guard.
In addition, the Council may establish technical and advisory committees if it deems them
necessary to aid and advise the Council. Representation, membership, terms, and
organization of the advisory committees will be determined by the Council.
Council Goals
The Council has specific goals. These goals include serving as a forum for identifying and
understanding invasive species issues, facilitating the communication and cooperation of
those involved with invasive species, reviewing the current funding mechanisms and levels
for state agencies to manage noxious weeds on public lands, providing an avenue for public
outreach, and developing future legislative recommendations.
In addition, the Council must prepare a strategic plan for addressing invasive species issues.
The state agencies represented on the Council must make an effort to implement the elements
of the plan applicable to that agency. The plan must, at a minimum, address the following
issues:
The Council must select at least one project each year from the strategic plan. This project
will be the focus of coordinated action by the Council's member entities.
New Account
The new non-appropriated Invasive Species Council Account (Account) is created. The
Account will receive any appropriations, gifts, grants, or donations that the Council may be
given. Money in the Account may only be used to fund the Council's charge under the bill.
Reports to the Legislature
In addition to developing recommendations for new legislation, the Council is required to
submit an annual report to the Legislature and the Governor. The report is to describe the
progress made towards implementing the strategic plan. By the end of 2010, the Council
must report to the Legislature as to whether its existence should be extended or modified.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: (Natural Resources, Ecology & Parks) (In support of engrossed substitute)
The current state approach to invasive species management is fragmented among various
agencies, but there is no central coordination. As a result, the various agencies compete for
funding and function in a manner that is not necessarily in the best interest of the state.
Washington needs effective and efficient control of invasive species.
Invasive species are harmful to ecosystems and can transfer to new habitats quickly. Healthy
habitats are the key to healthy bird populations, and invasive species are a major threat to bird
habitat.
(With concerns on engrossed substitute) If the Council is truly going to foster cooperation
and joint efforts, than counties should be expressly included in the legislation.
Testimony For: (Appropriations) (In support) We worked on this last year and this bill adds
counties to the Invasive Species Council and is supported by agencies, such as the
Departments of Fish and Wildlife and Agriculture. All of these agencies have invasive
species work and staff and sometimes their activities are in conflict or not well organized.
We want to avoid that conflict and provide the technical support through ad-hoc committees
that can be formed though this bill. This will save the state money over time and the Senate
funds $100,000 for the coordination piece of the bill. The impact of invasive species is
significant on endangered species, with the largest impact being from aquatic species; and the
cost to the economy is in the billions of dollars. It is best to be proactive before these
invasive species get into the state.
(With concerns) The criteria on which an invasive species is based is not based on technical
knowledge of these species. Some plants have been mislabeled as invasive species. The bill
does not provide for anyone with technical experience or with horticultural knowledge.
Testimony Against: (Natural Resources, Ecology & Parks) None.
Testimony Against: (Appropriations) None.
Persons Testifying: (Natural Resources, Ecology & Parks) (In support of engrossed
substitute) Senator Jacobsen, prime sponsor; Senator Roach; Mike Ryherd, Conservation
Northwest; Miguel Perez-Gibson, Audubon Society; Morris Barker, Department of Fish and
Wildlife; and Laura Johnson, Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation.
(With concerns on engrossed substitute) Eric Johnson, Washington Association of Counties.
Persons Testifying: (Appropriations) (In support) Bill Robinson, The Nature Conservancy;
and Mike Ryherd, Conservation Northwest.
(With concerns) Heather Hansen, Washington State Nursery and Landscape Association.