SENATE BILL REPORT
HB 1384



As of March 21, 2005

Title: An act relating to construction and operation of renewable energy projects by joint operating agencies.

Brief Description: Authorizing the construction and operation of renewable energy projects by joint operating agencies.

Sponsors: Representatives Haler, B. Sullivan, Morris, Crouse, P. Sullivan, Chase and Hudgins.

Brief History:

Committee Activity: Government Operations & Elections:


SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS & ELECTIONS

Staff: Diane Smith (786-7410)

Background: Joint operating agencies (JOAs) are formed by cities and public utility districts that join together to develop electricity generation projects. The only JOA currently operating is Energy Northwest. It operates and maintains the state's only nuclear powered electrical generation facility. Energy Northwest has recently developed a wind power generation site, a solar power demonstration site, and is exploring generation using biomass and fuel cells.

A JOA must use a sealed bid process to purchase materials, equipment, and supplies costing more than $10,000 or to order work for the construction of generating facilities and associated facilities costing more than $10,000.

A JOA may use a competitive negotiation process for contracts to acquire materials, equipment, and supplies or for work performed during the commercial operation of a nuclear generating project. This process may be used where an existing contract is in default or is terminated or if the managing director and the executive board of the JOA finds that the project will be completed or will operate more economically than using the sealed bid process.

The negotiated bid process for selecting a contractor includes several steps. The JOA issues a request for proposal along with public notice similar to that of the sealed bid process. A pre-bid conference is held to discuss and clarify the contract requirements in the request for proposal. Any inquires from potential offerors and the responses from the JOA are given to all potential offerors. The contract requirements may be refined during this process.

Once offerors submit proposals, further discussion and clarification takes place with each offeror. Proposals may be revised in order to obtain the best and final offers. Proposals must be opened and discussed in a manner that protects their disclosure to competing offerors during the negotiation process.

The JOA selects the offeror's proposal that is most advantageous to the JOA and the state. The basis of the final selection must be part of the contract file. After a contract is awarded, a register of proposals is available for public inspection. Any offeror may request a briefing conference on the selection.

The contract may be a fixed price or cost-reimbursable, but not a cost plus percentage of cost.

Summary of Bill: A JOA's authorization to use a competitive negotiation process is extended to the acquisition of materials, equipment, and supplies, or for work performed for the siting, construction, or deploying of a renewable electrical energy generation project. The competitive negotiation process may be used if the managing director and the executive board of the operating agency find that the project operation or completion will be more economical than using the sealed bid process.

The competitive negotiation procedures for selecting a contractor are the same as those for selecting a contractor for a nuclear powered electrical generating facility. In addition, the selection of a contractor must be made in an open public meeting as part of the public record.

A renewable electrical generation project is a generation facility fueled by wind, solar energy, geothermal energy, landfill gas, wave or tidal action, gas produced by wastewater treatment, qualified hydropower, or biomass energy.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Not requested.

Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.

Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Testimony For: Bonneville Power can only own generating facilities and sell energy at cost to public agencies. The federal government allows a credit for production incentives. Energy Northwest is building wind, solar, hydro and biomass electrical generation projects for which the sealed bid process is cumbersome. Use of negotiated competition would cut costs. It is a procurement tool to ensure mutual understanding of technology that may not be fully developed at the time.

Testimony Against: This statute was given to WPPS as a result of its debacle. There is no connection at all between negotiated competition in lieu of sealed bids. Why are renewable resources different from other projects? The current statute only covers materials, supply, and operation. The bill expands it to project site development, construction and deployment. The public opening is behind closed doors and can lead to abuses. The RFP and RFQ can get at qualifications. Competitive negotiation is an oxymoron. They can use GC/CM, job order contracting or design/build that already exist and have protections built in.

Who Testified: Pro: Jim Rowland, Energy Northwest; Michael Wilson, Energy Northwest. Con: Michael Transue, Associated General Contractors; Larry Stevens, mechanical and electrical contractors; Cliff Webster; Dave Ducharme, utility contractors.