SENATE BILL REPORT
SSB 5692
As Passed Senate, March 8, 2005
Title: An act relating to tax refund anticipation loans.
Brief Description: Regulating tax refund anticipation loans.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Financial Institutions, Housing & Consumer Protection (originally sponsored by Senators Berkey, Benton, Prentice and Keiser).
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Financial Institutions, Housing & Consumer Protection: 2/15/05, 2/24/05[DPS].
Passed Senate: 3/8/05, 48-0.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, HOUSING & CONSUMER PROTECTION
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5692 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass.Signed by Senators Fairley, Chair; Berkey, Vice Chair; Benton, Ranking Minority Member; Benson, Brandland, Delvin, Franklin, Keiser, Prentice, Schmidt and Spanel.
Staff: Jennifer Arnold (786-7471)
Background: Refund anticipation loans (RALs) are loans made by a lender to a taxpayer based
on that taxpayer's anticipated federal income tax refund. If a refund is due, a loan may be offered
to a taxpayer at the time of tax preparation and filing by a tax preparer or "facilitator." The
taxpayer/borrower signs a contract authorizing the lender to receive the tax refund from the
federal Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The borrower is given an immediate loan secured by the
refund. Broker fees are deducted from the borrower's IRS tax refund. The borrower is liable if
the refund paid by the IRS is less than the loan.
State law is preempted by federal regulation in regards to the lending practices of national banks.
Therefore, RALs are generally not subject to regulation by the Department of Financial
Institutions (DFI), as the majority of these loan products are made by national banks or their
subsidiaries. However, the state is not preempted from regulating the non-banking activities of
national tax preparers.
Summary of Bill: The Tax Refund Anticipation Loan Act is created. The Act defines a
"facilitator" as a person who receives or accepts for delivery an application for a RAL, delivers
a check in payment of RAL proceeds, or acts in any other manner to allow the making of a refund
anticipation loan. Facilitator does not include financial institutions, the affiliate of a financial
institution, or any person who acts solely as an intermediary and who does not
deal with the taxpayer in the making of the refund anticipation loan.
Under the Act, the following must be clearly disclosed, in a minimum of 10 point font, by the
facilitator to the borrower prior to completion of the loan application:
In addition, the facilitator must provide the borrower with the federal disclosures required under
the Truth In Lending Act.
A facilitator is expressly prohibited from engaging in the following activities: (1) misrepresenting
material facts; (2) failing to process an application promptly; (3) participating in any dishonest,
fraudulent, unfair, unconscionable , or unethical practice or conduct in connection with the RAL;
and arranging for a creditor to take a security interest in any of the consumer's property, other than
the proceeds from the tax refund to secure payment of the loan.
A knowing and willful violation of these requirements is a misdemeanor, subject to a fine of up
to 500 dollars per offense. Further, a violation under this Act is also a violation of the Consumer
Protection Act and as such, is subject to the penalties thereunder. This Act retroactively and
prospectively preempts any other state and local laws relating to RAL facilitators.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: We need to ensure that taxpayers make informed decisions. This is good consumer protection legislation, as disclosure is the cornerstone to protecting consumers. Tax preparers are already heavily regulated by the federal government; therefore, what is needed most is a disclosure requirement to inform taxpayers of exactly what they are getting.
Testimony Against: None.
Other: Stronger enforcement provisions are needed.
Who Testified: PRO: Tom Echols, Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited;
Michael Beresik, H&R Block; Stephen Sprenger, H&R Block Franchise; Steve Gano, Jackson
Hewitt; Robert Pregulman, Washington PIRL. OTHER: Gene Forrester, Washington Senior
Citizen's Lobby; Julie Nelson, City of Seattle; Jennifer Romich, Researcher.
House Amendment(s): Facilitators are required to register with DFI, as well as be an IRS-authorized e-file provider. Further, it is required that a facilitator must be a tax preparer or work for
a tax preparer. A borrower is allowed to rescind the loan by the close of business the next day. An
additional prohibition on the activities of a facilitator is included, which provides that a RAL cannot
be offered for more than the amount of the borrower's anticipated tax refund, not including related
loan fees.
Passed House: 94-0.