| Passed by the House March 10, 2005 Yeas 94 FRANK CHOPP ________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives Passed by the Senate April 4, 2005 Yeas 41 BRAD OWEN ________________________________________ President of the Senate | I, Richard Nafziger, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is HOUSE BILL 1838 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth. RICHARD NAFZIGER ________________________________________ Chief Clerk | |
| Approved April 13, 2005. CHRISTINE GREGOIRE ________________________________________ Governor of the State of Washington | April 13, 2005 - 3:25 p.m. Secretary of State State of Washington |
| State of Washington | 59th Legislature | 2005 Regular Session |
Read first time 02/08/2005. Referred to Committee on Natural Resources, Ecology & Parks.
AN ACT Relating to increasing the threshold for short board appeals before the shorelines and pollution control hearings boards to fifteen thousand dollars; and amending RCW 90.58.185 and 43.21B.305.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1 RCW 90.58.185 and 1994 c 253 s 2 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) In the case of an appeal involving a single family residence or
appurtenance to a single family residence, including a dock or pier
designed to serve a single family residence, or of appeals involving a
penalty of fifteen thousand dollars or less, the request for review may
be heard by a panel of three board members, at least one and not more
than two of whom shall be members of the pollution control hearings
board. Two members of the three must agree to issue a final decision
of the board.
(2) The board shall define by rule alternative processes to
expedite appeals, including those involving a single-family residence
or appurtenance to a single-family residence, including a dock or pier
designed to serve a single-family residence, or involving a penalty of
fifteen thousand dollars or less. These alternatives may include:
Mediation, upon agreement of all parties; submission of testimony by
affidavit; or other forms that may lead to less formal and faster
resolution of appeals.
Sec. 2 RCW 43.21B.305 and 1994 c 253 s 5 are each amended to read
as follows:
In an appeal that involves a penalty of ((five)) fifteen thousand
dollars or less, the appeal may be heard by one member of the board,
whose decision shall be the final decision of the board. The board
shall define by rule alternative procedures to expedite ((small))
appeals involving penalties of fifteen thousand dollars or less. These
alternatives may include: Mediation, upon agreement of all parties;
submission of testimony by affidavit; or other forms that may lead to
less formal and faster resolution of appeals.