CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT

SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1970

Chapter 384, Laws of 2005

59th Legislature
2005 Regular Session



GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY



EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/24/05

Passed by the House April 20, 2005
  Yeas 66   Nays 31

FRANK CHOPP
________________________________________    
Speaker of the House of Representatives


Passed by the Senate April 12, 2005
  Yeas 46   Nays 0


BRAD OWEN
________________________________________    
President of the Senate
 
CERTIFICATE

I, Richard Nafziger, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1970 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth.


RICHARD NAFZIGER
________________________________________    
Chief Clerk
Approved May 11, 2005.








CHRISTINE GREGOIRE
________________________________________    
Governor of the State of Washington
 
FILED
May 11, 2005 - 9:07 a.m.







Secretary of State
State of Washington


_____________________________________________ 

SECOND SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1970
_____________________________________________

AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE

Passed Legislature - 2005 Regular Session
State of Washington59th Legislature2005 Regular Session

By House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives P. Sullivan, Springer, Miloscia, Upthegrove, Morrell, Haigh, O'Brien, Linville and Takko; by request of Governor Gregoire)

READ FIRST TIME 03/07/05.   



     AN ACT Relating to improving government management, accountability, and performance; adding new sections to chapter 43.17 RCW; and creating new sections.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1   The legislature finds that:
     (1) Citizens demand and deserve accountability of public programs and activities. Public programs must continuously improve accountability and performance reporting in order to increase public trust.
     (2) Washington state government agencies must continuously improve their management and performance so citizens receive maximum value for their tax dollars.
     (3) The application of best practices in performance management has improved results and accountability in many Washington state agencies and other jurisdictions.
     (4) All Washington state agencies must develop a performance-based culture that can better demonstrate accountability and achievement.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2   A new section is added to chapter 43.17 RCW to read as follows:
     As used in sections 3 and 4 of this act:
     (1) "State agency" or "agency" means a state agency, department, office, officer, board, commission, bureau, division, institution, or institution of higher education, and all offices of executive branch state government-elected officials, except agricultural commissions under Title 15 RCW.
     (2) "Quality management, accountability, and performance system" means a nationally recognized integrated, interdisciplinary system of measures, tools, and reports used to improve the performance of a work unit or organization.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3   A new section is added to chapter 43.17 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) Each state agency shall, within available funds, develop and implement a quality management, accountability, and performance system to improve the public services it provides.
     (2) Each agency shall ensure that managers and staff at all levels, including those who directly deliver services, are engaged in the system and shall provide managers and staff with the training necessary for successful implementation.
     (3) Each agency shall, within available funds, ensure that its quality management, accountability, and performance system:
     (a) Uses strategic business planning to establish goals, objectives, and activities consistent with the priorities of government, as provided in statute;
     (b) Engages stakeholders and customers in establishing service requirements and improving service delivery systems;
     (c) Includes clear, relevant, and easy-to-understand measures for each activity;
     (d) Gathers, monitors, and analyzes activity data;
     (e) Uses the data to evaluate the effectiveness of programs to manage process performance, improve efficiency, and reduce costs;
     (f) Establishes performance goals and expectations for employees that reflect the organization's objectives; and provides for regular assessments of employee performance;
     (g) Uses activity measures to report progress toward agency objectives to the agency director at least quarterly;
     (h) Where performance is not meeting intended objectives, holds regular problem-solving sessions to develop and implement a plan for addressing gaps; and
     (i) Allocates resources based on strategies to improve performance.
     (4) Each agency shall conduct a yearly assessment of its quality management, accountability, and performance system.
     (5) State agencies whose chief executives are appointed by the governor shall report to the governor on agency performance at least quarterly. The reports shall be included on the agencies', the governor's, and the office of financial management's web sites.
     (6) The governor shall report annually to citizens on the performance of state agency programs. The governor's report shall include:
     (a) Progress made toward the priorities of government as a result of agency activities; and
     (b) Improvements in agency quality management systems, fiscal efficiency, process efficiency, asset management, personnel management, statutory and regulatory compliance, and management of technology systems.
     (7) Each state agency shall integrate efforts made under this section with other management, accountability, and performance systems undertaken under executive order or other authority.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4   A new section is added to chapter 43.17 RCW to read as follows:
     Starting no later than 2008, and at least once every three years thereafter, each agency shall apply to the Washington state quality award, or similar organization, for an independent assessment of its quality management, accountability, and performance system. The assessment shall evaluate the effectiveness of all elements of its management, accountability, and performance system, including: Leadership, strategic planning, customer focus, analysis and information, employee performance management, and process improvement. The purpose of the assessment is to recognize best practice and identify improvement opportunities.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 5   If specific funding for the purposes of this act, referencing this act by bill or chapter number, is not provided by June 30, 2005, in the omnibus appropriations act, this act is null and void.


         Passed by the House April 20, 2005.
         Passed by the Senate April 12, 2005.
         Approved by the Governor May 11, 2005.
         Filed in Office of Secretary of State May 11, 2005.