Passed by the Senate March 6, 2006 YEAS 45   BRAD OWEN ________________________________________ President of the Senate Passed by the House March 3, 2006 YEAS 94   FRANK CHOPP ________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives | I, Thomas Hoemann, Secretary of the Senate of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6255 as passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives on the dates hereon set forth. THOMAS HOEMANN ________________________________________ Secretary | |
Approved March 20, 2006. CHRISTINE GREGOIRE ________________________________________ Governor of the State of Washington | March 20, 2006 - 10:31 a.m. Secretary of State State of Washington |
State of Washington | 59th Legislature | 2006 Regular Session |
READ FIRST TIME 01/18/06.
AN ACT Relating to improving student performance through student-centered planning; amending RCW 28A.655.200; adding a new section to chapter 28A.600 RCW; creating new sections; and providing an expiration date.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 The legislature recognizes that there are
specific skills and a body of knowledge that each student needs to
chart a course through middle school, high school, and post-high school
options. Each student needs active involvement from parents and at
least one supportive adult in the school who knows the student well and
cares about the student's progress and future. Students, parents, and
teachers also need the benefit of immediate feedback and accurate
diagnosis of students' academic strengths and weaknesses to inform the
students' short-term and long-term plans. To empower and motivate all
students and parents to take a greater role in charting the students'
own educational experiences, the legislature intends to strengthen
schools' guidance and planning programs.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2 A new section is added to chapter 28A.600
RCW to read as follows:
(1) The legislature encourages each middle school, junior high
school, and high school to implement a comprehensive guidance and
planning program for all students. The purpose of the program is to
support students as they navigate their education and plan their
future; encourage an ongoing and personal relationship between each
student and an adult in the school; and involve parents in students'
educational decisions and plans.
(2) A comprehensive guidance and planning program is a program that
contains at least the following components:
(a) A curriculum intended to provide the skills and knowledge
students need to select courses, explore options, plan for their
future, and take steps to implement their plans. The curriculum may
include such topics as analysis of students' test results; diagnostic
assessments of students' academic strengths and weaknesses; use of
assessment results in developing students' short-term and long-term
plans; assessments of student interests and aptitude; goal-setting
skills; planning for high school course selection; independent living
skills; and postsecondary options and how to access them;
(b) Regular meetings between each student and a teacher who serves
as an advisor throughout the student's enrollment at the school;
(c) Student-led conferences with the student's parents, guardians,
or family members and the student's advisor for the purpose of
demonstrating the student's accomplishments; identifying weaknesses;
planning and selecting courses; and setting long-term goals; and
(d) Data collection that allows schools to monitor students'
progress.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 3 (1) Subject to the availability of funds
appropriated for this purpose, the superintendent of public instruction
shall:
(a) Develop and disseminate the curriculum for the comprehensive
guidance and planning program under section 2 of this act to all school
districts no later than the beginning of the 2006-07 school year;
(b) Develop and disseminate electronic student planning tools and
a software package to analyze the impact of the implementation of the
program on student performance;
(c) Develop and disseminate information about options for
diagnostic assessments to improve student learning and student planning
as provided under RCW 28A.655.200;
(d) Develop and conduct regional training seminars for teachers on
the curriculum and on guidance and mentoring skills;
(e) Monitor and evaluate implementation of the program during the
fall of 2006 in order to revise and improve the curriculum by the
spring of 2007; and
(f) Allocate grants to selected schools for the purpose of
implementing the program. The superintendent shall develop and publish
the grant selection criteria, number of awards, and award amounts. The
first round of at least twenty-five grant recipients shall be selected
and notified by September 2006. The second round of at least seventy-five grant recipients shall be selected and notified by January 2007.
The purpose of the grants is to provide time for school staff to plan
and integrate the comprehensive program into their schools. To the
extent possible, the superintendent shall include representation from
school districts of varying sizes and from different geographic regions
of the state in the grant allocation.
(2) By January 1, 2009, the superintendent of public instruction
shall report to the education committees of the legislature regarding
the impact of comprehensive guidance and planning programs on student
performance.
Sec. 4 RCW 28A.655.200 and 2005 c 217 s 2 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) ((The legislature finds that the mandatory norm-referenced
student assessments eliminated under chapter 217, Laws of 2005 provide
information that teachers and parents use to improve student
learning.)) In the absence of mandatory, statewide, norm-referenced
assessments, the legislature intends to permit school districts to
offer norm-referenced assessments ((at the districts' own expense
and)), make diagnostic tools available ((that provide information that
is at least as valuable as the information eliminated under chapter
217, Laws of 2005)), and provide funding for diagnostic assessments to
enhance guidance and planning for students and to provide early
intervention before the high school Washington assessment of student
learning.
(2) In addition to the diagnostic assessments provided under
subsection (5) of this section, school districts may, at their own
expense, administer norm-referenced assessments to students.
(3) By September 1, 2005, subject to available funds, the office of
the superintendent of public instruction shall post on its web site for
voluntary use by school districts, a guide of diagnostic assessments.
The assessments in the guide, to the extent possible, shall include the
characteristics listed in subsection (4)(((a) through (e))) of this
section.
(4) ((By September 1, 2006, subject to the availability of amounts
appropriated for this specific purpose)) Beginning September 1, 2007,
the office of the superintendent of public instruction shall make
available to school districts diagnostic assessments that help improve
student learning. To the greatest extent possible, the assessments
shall be:
(a) Aligned to the state's grade level expectations;
(b) Individualized to each student's performance level;
(c) Administered efficiently to provide results either immediately
or within two weeks;
(d) Capable of measuring individual student growth over time and
allowing student progress to be compared to other students across the
country; ((and))
(e) Readily available to parents; and
(f) Cost-effective.
(5) Beginning with the 2006-07 school year, the superintendent of
public instruction shall reimburse school districts for administration
of diagnostic assessments in grade nine for the purpose of identifying
academic weaknesses, enhancing student planning and guidance, and
developing targeted instructional strategies to assist students before
the high school Washington assessment of student learning.
(6) The office of the superintendent of public instruction is
encouraged to offer at ((their)) statewide and regional staff
development activities training opportunities that would assist
practitioners in:
(a) The interpretation of diagnostic assessments; and
(b) Application of instructional strategies that will increase
student learning based on diagnostic assessment data.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 5 If specific funding for the purposes of this
act and section 4 of this act, referencing this act and section 4 of
this act by bill or chapter number and section number, is not provided
by June 30, 2006, in the omnibus appropriations act, section 4 of this
act is null and void.