ESSB 6023 -
By Committee on Education
NOT CONSIDERED 04/10/2007
Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert the following:
"NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 (1) The legislature maintains a strong
commitment to high expectations and high academic achievement for all
students. The legislature finds that Washington schools and students
are making significant progress in improving achievement in reading and
writing. Schools are adapting instruction and providing remediation
for students who need additional assistance. Reading and writing are
being taught across the curriculum. Therefore, the legislature does
not intend to make changes to the Washington assessment of student
learning or high school graduation requirements in reading and writing.
(2) However, students are having difficulty improving their
academic achievement in mathematics and science, particularly as
measured by the high school Washington assessment of student learning.
The legislature finds that corrections are needed in the state's high
school assessment system that will improve alignment between learning
standards, instruction, diagnosis, and assessment of students'
knowledge and skills in high school mathematics and science. The
legislature further finds there is a sense of urgency to make these
corrections and intends to revise high school graduation requirements
in mathematics and science only for the minimum period for corrections
to be fully implemented.
Sec. 2 RCW 28A.655.061 and 2006 c 115 s 4 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) The high school assessment system shall include but need not be
limited to the Washington assessment of student learning, opportunities
for a student to retake the content areas of the assessment in which
the student was not successful, and if approved by the legislature
pursuant to subsection (10) of this section, one or more objective
alternative assessments for a student to demonstrate achievement of
state academic standards. The objective alternative assessments for
each content area shall be comparable in rigor to the skills and
knowledge that the student must demonstrate on the Washington
assessment of student learning for each content area.
(2) Subject to the conditions in this section, a certificate of
academic achievement shall be obtained by most students at about the
age of sixteen, and is evidence that the students have successfully met
the state standard in the content areas included in the certificate.
With the exception of students satisfying the provisions of RCW
28A.155.045 or section 4 of this act, acquisition of the certificate is
required for graduation from a public high school but is not the only
requirement for graduation.
(3) Beginning with the graduating class of 2008, with the exception
of students satisfying the provisions of RCW 28A.155.045, a student who
meets the state standards on the reading, writing, and mathematics
content areas of the high school Washington assessment of student
learning shall earn a certificate of academic achievement. If a
student does not successfully meet the state standards in one or more
content areas required for the certificate of academic achievement,
then the student may retake the assessment in the content area up to
four times at no cost to the student. If the student successfully
meets the state standards on a retake of the assessment then the
student shall earn a certificate of academic achievement. Once
objective alternative assessments are authorized pursuant to subsection
(10) of this section, a student may use the objective alternative
assessments to demonstrate that the student successfully meets the
state standards ((for that)) in the reading or writing content areas if
the student has ((retaken)) taken the Washington assessment of student
learning at least twice. In the remaining content areas, a student may
use the objective alternative assessments if the student has taken the
Washington assessment of student learning at least once. If the
student successfully meets the state standards on the objective
alternative assessments then the student shall earn a certificate of
academic achievement.
(4) Beginning with the graduating class of ((2010)) 2013, a student
must meet the state standards in science in addition to the other
content areas required under subsection (3) of this section on the
Washington assessment of student learning or the objective alternative
assessments in order to earn a certificate of academic achievement.
(5) The state board of education may not require the acquisition of
the certificate of academic achievement for students in home-based
instruction under chapter 28A.200 RCW, for students enrolled in private
schools under chapter 28A.195 RCW, or for students satisfying the
provisions of RCW 28A.155.045.
(6) A student may retain and use the highest result from each
successfully completed content area of the high school assessment.
(7) ((Beginning in 2006,)) School districts must make available to
students the following options:
(a) To retake the Washington assessment of student learning up to
four times in the content areas in which the student did not meet the
state standards if the student is enrolled in a public school; or
(b) To retake the Washington assessment of student learning up to
four times in the content areas in which the student did not meet the
state standards if the student is enrolled in a high school completion
program at a community or technical college. The superintendent of
public instruction and the state board for community and technical
colleges shall jointly identify means by which students in these
programs can be assessed.
(8) Students who achieve the standard in a content area of the high
school assessment but who wish to improve their results shall pay for
retaking the assessment, using a uniform cost determined by the
superintendent of public instruction.
(9) ((Subject to available funding, the superintendent shall pilot
opportunities for retaking the high school assessment beginning in the
2004-05 school year. Beginning no later than September 2006,))
Opportunities to retake the assessment at least twice a year shall be
available to each school district.
(10)(a) The office of the superintendent of public instruction
shall develop options for implementing objective alternative
assessments, which may include an appeals process, for students to
demonstrate achievement of the state academic standards. The objective
alternative assessments shall be comparable in rigor to the skills and
knowledge that the student must demonstrate on the Washington
assessment of student learning and be objective in its determination of
student achievement of the state standards. Before any objective
alternative assessments in addition to those authorized in RCW
28A.655.065 or (b) of this subsection are used by a student to
demonstrate that the student has met the state standards in a content
area required to obtain a certificate, the legislature shall formally
approve the use of any objective alternative assessments through the
omnibus appropriations act or by statute or concurrent resolution.
(b) A student's score on the mathematics or reading portion of the
preliminary scholastic assessment test (PSAT)((,)) or on the
mathematics, reading or English, or writing portion of the scholastic
assessment test (SAT)((,)) or the American college test (ACT) may be
used as an objective alternative assessment under this section for
demonstrating that a student has met or exceeded the ((mathematics))
state standards for the certificate of academic achievement. The state
board of education shall identify the scores students must achieve on
the ((mathematics)) relevant portion of the PSAT, SAT, or ACT to meet
or exceed the state standard ((for mathematics)) in the relevant
content area on the Washington assessment of student learning. The
state board of education shall identify the first scores by December 1,
((2006, and thereafter)) 2007. After the first scores are established,
the state board may increase but not decrease the scores required for
students to meet or exceed the state standards ((for mathematics)).
(11) By December 15, 2004, the house of representatives and senate
education committees shall obtain information and conclusions from
recognized, independent, national assessment experts regarding the
validity and reliability of the high school Washington assessment of
student learning for making individual student high school graduation
determinations.
(12) To help assure continued progress in academic achievement as
a foundation for high school graduation and to assure that students are
on track for high school graduation, each school district shall prepare
plans for students as provided in this subsection (12).
(a) Student learning plans are required for eighth through twelfth
grade students who were not successful on any or all of the content
areas of the Washington assessment for student learning during the
previous school year. The plan shall include the courses,
competencies, and other steps needed to be taken by the student to meet
state academic standards and stay on track for graduation. ((This
requirement shall be phased in as follows:)) (i) The parent or guardian shall be notified, preferably
through a parent conference, of the student's results on the Washington
assessment of student learning, actions the school intends to take to
improve the student's skills in any content area in which the student
was unsuccessful, strategies to help them improve their student's
skills, and the content of the student's plan.
(i) Beginning no later than the 2004-05 school year ninth grade
students as described in this subsection (12)(a) shall have a plan.
(ii) Beginning no later than the 2005-06 school year and every year
thereafter eighth grade students as described in this subsection
(12)(a) shall have a plan.
(iii)
(((iv))) (ii) Progress made on the student plan shall be reported
to the student's parents or guardian at least annually and adjustments
to the plan made as necessary.
(b) ((Beginning with the 2005-06 school year and every year
thereafter,)) All fifth grade students who were not successful in one
or more of the content areas of the fourth grade Washington assessment
of student learning shall have a student learning plan.
(i) The parent or guardian of ((a)) the student ((described in this
subsection (12)(b))) shall be notified, preferably through a parent
conference, of the student's results on the Washington assessment of
student learning, actions the school intends to take to improve the
student's skills in any content area in which the student was
unsuccessful, and provide strategies to help them improve their
student's skills.
(ii) Progress made on the student plan shall be reported to the
student's parents or guardian at least annually and adjustments to the
plan made as necessary.
Sec. 3 RCW 28A.155.045 and 2004 c 19 s 104 are each amended to
read as follows:
Beginning with the graduating class of 2008, students served under
this chapter, who are not appropriately assessed by the high school
Washington assessment system as defined in RCW 28A.655.061, even with
accommodations, may earn a certificate of individual achievement. The
certificate may be earned using multiple ways to demonstrate skills and
abilities commensurate with their individual education programs. The
determination of whether the high school assessment system is
appropriate shall be made by the student's individual education program
team. Except as provided in section 4 of this act, for these students,
the certificate of individual achievement is required for graduation
from a public high school, but need not be the only requirement for
graduation. When measures other than the high school assessment system
as defined in RCW 28A.655.061 are used, the measures shall be in
agreement with the appropriate educational opportunity provided for the
student as required by this chapter. The superintendent of public
instruction shall develop the guidelines for determining which students
should not be required to participate in the high school assessment
system and which types of assessments are appropriate to use.
When measures other than the high school assessment system as
defined in RCW 28A.655.061 are used for high school graduation
purposes, the student's high school transcript shall note whether that
student has earned a certificate of individual achievement.
Nothing in this section shall be construed to deny a student the
right to participation in the high school assessment system as defined
in RCW 28A.655.061, and, upon successfully meeting the high school
standard, receipt of the certificate of academic achievement.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 4 A new section is added to chapter 28A.655
RCW to read as follows:
(1) Beginning with the graduating class of 2008 and until the
graduating class of 2012, students may graduate from high school
without earning a certificate of academic achievement or a certificate
of individual achievement if they:
(a) Have not successfully met the mathematics standard on the high
school Washington assessment of student learning, an approved objective
alternative assessment, or an alternate assessment developed for
eligible special education students;
(b) Have successfully met the state standard in the other content
areas required for a certificate under RCW 28A.655.061 or 28A.155.045;
(c) Have met all other state and school district graduation
requirements; and
(d)(i) For the graduating class of 2008, successfully earn one
additional high school mathematics credit after the student's eleventh
grade year designed to increase the individual student's mathematics
proficiency toward meeting or exceeding the mathematics standards
assessed on the high school Washington assessment of student learning;
and
(ii) For the remaining graduating classes under this section,
successfully earn two additional mathematics credits after the
student's tenth grade year designed to increase the individual
student's mathematics proficiency toward meeting or exceeding the
mathematics standards assessed on the high school Washington assessment
of student learning.
(2) This section expires August 31, 2013.
Sec. 5 RCW 28A.655.070 and 2005 c 497 s 106 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) The superintendent of public instruction shall develop
essential academic learning requirements that identify the knowledge
and skills all public school students need to know and be able to do
based on the student learning goals in RCW 28A.150.210, develop student
assessments, and implement the accountability recommendations and
requests regarding assistance, rewards, and recognition of the state
board of education.
(2) The superintendent of public instruction shall:
(a) Periodically revise the essential academic learning
requirements, as needed, based on the student learning goals in RCW
28A.150.210. Goals one and two shall be considered primary. To the
maximum extent possible, the superintendent shall integrate goal four
and the knowledge and skill areas in the other goals in the essential
academic learning requirements; and
(b) Review and prioritize the essential academic learning
requirements and identify, with clear and concise descriptions, the
grade level content expectations to be assessed on the Washington
assessment of student learning and used for state or federal
accountability purposes. The review, prioritization, and
identification shall result in more focus and targeting with an
emphasis on depth over breadth in the number of grade level content
expectations assessed at each grade level. Grade level content
expectations shall be articulated over the grades as a sequence of
expectations and performances that are logical, build with increasing
depth after foundational knowledge and skills are acquired, and
reflect, where appropriate, the sequential nature of the discipline.
The office of the superintendent of public instruction, within seven
working days, shall post on its web site any grade level content
expectations provided to an assessment vendor for use in constructing
the Washington assessment of student learning.
(3) In consultation with the state board of education, the
superintendent of public instruction shall maintain and continue to
develop and revise a statewide academic assessment system in the
content areas of reading, writing, mathematics, and science for use in
the elementary, middle, and high school years designed to determine if
each student has mastered the essential academic learning requirements
identified in subsection (1) of this section. School districts shall
administer the assessments under guidelines adopted by the
superintendent of public instruction. The academic assessment system
((shall)) may include a variety of assessment methods, including
criterion-referenced and performance-based measures.
(4) If the superintendent proposes any modification to the
essential academic learning requirements or the statewide assessments,
then the superintendent shall, upon request, provide opportunities for
the education committees of the house of representatives and the senate
to review the assessments and proposed modifications to the essential
academic learning requirements before the modifications are adopted.
(5)(((a))) The assessment system shall be designed so that the
results under the assessment system are used by educators as tools to
evaluate instructional practices, and to initiate appropriate
educational support for students who have not mastered the essential
academic learning requirements at the appropriate periods in the
student's educational development.
(((b) Assessments measuring the essential academic learning
requirements in the content area of science shall be available for
mandatory use in middle schools and high schools by the 2003-04 school
year and for mandatory use in elementary schools by the 2004-05 school
year unless the legislature takes action to delay or prevent
implementation of the assessment.))
(6) By September 2007, the results for reading and mathematics
shall be reported in a format that will allow parents and teachers to
determine the academic gain a student has acquired in those content
areas from one school year to the next.
(7) To assist parents and teachers in their efforts to provide
educational support to individual students, the superintendent of
public instruction shall provide as much individual student performance
information as possible within the constraints of the assessment
system's item bank. The superintendent shall also provide to school
districts:
(a) Information on classroom-based and other assessments that may
provide additional achievement information for individual students; and
(b) A collection of diagnostic tools that educators may use to
evaluate the academic status of individual students. The tools shall
be designed to be inexpensive, easily administered, and quickly and
easily scored, with results provided in a format that may be easily
shared with parents and students.
(8) To the maximum extent possible, the superintendent shall
integrate knowledge and skill areas in development of the assessments.
(9) Assessments for goals three and four of RCW 28A.150.210 shall
be integrated in the essential academic learning requirements and
assessments for goals one and two.
(10) The superintendent shall develop assessments that are directly
related to the essential academic learning requirements, and are not
biased toward persons with different learning styles, racial or ethnic
backgrounds, or on the basis of gender.
(11) The superintendent shall consider methods to address the
unique needs of special education students when developing the
assessments under this section.
(12) The superintendent shall consider methods to address the
unique needs of highly capable students when developing the assessments
under this section.
(13) The superintendent shall post on the superintendent's web site
lists of resources and model assessments in social studies, the arts,
and health and fitness.
Sec. 6 RCW 28A.655.063 and 2006 c 115 s 5 are each amended to
read as follows:
Subject to the availability of funds appropriated for this purpose,
((school districts shall reimburse)) the office of the superintendent
of public instruction shall provide funds to school districts, arrange
for students to receive a testing fee waiver, or make other
arrangements to compensate students for the cost of taking the tests in
RCW 28A.655.061(10)(b) when the students take the tests for the purpose
of using the ((mathematics)) results as an objective alternative
assessment.
Sec. 7 RCW 28A.655.200 and 2006 c 117 s 4 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) ((In the absence of mandatory, statewide, norm-referenced
assessments,)) The legislature intends to permit school districts to
offer norm-referenced assessments, make diagnostic tools available to
school districts, and provide funding for diagnostic assessments to
enhance ((guidance and planning for students and to)) student learning
at all grade levels and provide early intervention before the high
school Washington assessment of student learning.
(2) In addition to the diagnostic assessments provided under
((subsection (5) of)) this section, school districts may, at their own
expense, administer norm-referenced assessments to students.
(3)(( By September 1, 2005, subject to available funds,)) The
office of the superintendent of public instruction shall post on its
web site for voluntary use by school districts, a guide of diagnostic
assessments. The assessments in the guide, to the extent possible,
shall include the characteristics listed in subsection (4) of this
section.
(4) Beginning September 1, 2007, the office of the superintendent
of public instruction shall make diagnostic assessments in reading,
writing, mathematics, and science in elementary and middle school
grades available to school districts ((diagnostic assessments that)).
Subject to funds appropriated for this purpose, the office of the
superintendent of public instruction shall also provide funding to
school districts for administration of diagnostic assessments to help
improve student learning, identify academic weaknesses, enhance student
planning and guidance, and develop targeted instructional strategies to
assist students before the high school Washington assessment of student
learning. To the greatest extent possible, the assessments shall be:
(a) Aligned to the state's grade level expectations;
(b) Individualized to each student's performance level;
(c) Administered efficiently to provide results either immediately
or within two weeks;
(d) Capable of measuring individual student growth over time and
allowing student progress to be compared to other students across the
country;
(e) Readily available to parents; and
(f) Cost-effective.
(5) ((Beginning with the 2006-07 school year, the superintendent of
public instruction shall reimburse school districts for administration
of diagnostic assessments in grade nine for the purpose of identifying
academic weaknesses, enhancing student planning and guidance, and
developing targeted instructional strategies to assist students before
the high school Washington assessment of student learning.)) The office of the superintendent of public instruction ((
(6)is
encouraged to)) shall offer training at statewide and regional staff
development activities ((training opportunities that would assist
practitioners)) in:
(a) The interpretation of diagnostic assessments; and
(b) Application of instructional strategies that will increase
student learning based on diagnostic assessment data.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 8 (1)(a) The state board of education, in
consultation with the superintendent of public instruction, shall
examine and recommend changes to the high school Washington assessment
of student learning in the content areas of mathematics and science.
(b) In its examination and recommendations, the state board shall
address the following issues:
(i) Timeliness of the return of score results;
(ii) The diagnostic value of score results;
(iii) Cost of administration of the assessment and the burden on
school districts; and
(iv) Opportunities to improve alignment of curriculum, instruction,
and the assessment.
(c) One of the changes the state board shall examine under this
subsection (1) is replacing the current high school Washington
assessment of student learning with a limited series of end-of-course
assessments in mathematics and science. The board's examination of
end-of-course assessments shall include:
(i) An objective analysis of the potential strengths and weaknesses
of end-of-course assessments as the primary high school assessment tool
for student and school accountability;
(ii) Analysis of the possible impact of end-of-course assessments
on curriculum and instruction in mathematics and science;
(iii) The appropriate mathematics and science content to be covered
by end-of-course assessments; and
(iv) Recommended implementation timelines and issues to be
addressed in replacing the current assessment.
(2) In conducting its examination under subsection (1) of this
section, the state board of education shall seek input from independent
national assessment experts; examine the experience of other states,
particularly states that have implemented end-of-course assessments;
and use a deliberative public process to ensure adequate input from
teachers, school and district administrators, the business community,
parents, and other interested individuals and organizations.
(3) In any request for proposals for a new testing contractor for
the Washington assessment of student learning, the superintendent of
public instruction shall include the possible changes being examined by
the state board of education so that additional information about the
cost and feasibility of the changes can be provided by prospective
testing contractors.
(4) The state board of education shall also examine and make
recommendations regarding:
(a) Options for and possible impacts of compensatory models for
setting the standard on the Washington assessment of student learning
for graduation purposes; and
(b) The effectiveness of current authorized alternative assessments
and opportunities for additional alternative assessments, including the
use of one or more standardized norm-referenced student achievement
tests.
(5) The state board of education shall submit a progress report
along with any preliminary recommendations on the issues required to be
examined under this section to the education committees of the
legislature by January 10, 2008. The state board of education shall
submit a final report to the education committees of the legislature by
December 1, 2008. The final report shall include recommendations for
changes to the high school Washington assessment of student learning in
mathematics and science and a recommended timeline that provides for
expedited implementation of the recommended changes. The changes
recommended by the state board of education under this section shall be
able to be implemented no later than the 2010-11 school year in order
to apply to the graduating class of 2013.
(6) This section expires June 30, 2009.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 9 A new section is added to chapter 28A.655
RCW to read as follows:
(1) In allocating state funds for the promoting academic success
program, the legislature has recognized that high school students whose
scores represent a near miss of the state standard on the Washington
assessment of student learning require fewer remedial resources to
ensure that they meet the state standard on the next attempt. However,
there is significant variation among the remaining students whose
scores represent a far miss of the state standard regarding their
levels of knowledge and skills, and consequently the levels of
remediation they will need.
(2) School districts receiving funding allocations through the
promoting academic success program for high school students scoring
more than one standard error of measurement from meeting the state
standard shall assign more resources per student to support students
scoring at level one on the Washington assessment of student learning
than are assigned to support students scoring at level two."
Correct the title.