"NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1   The legislature finds from the 2006 Washington state ferries financing study that the state has limited information on state ferry users and markets. Accurate user and market information is vital in order to find ways to maximize the ferry systems' current capacity and to make the most efficient use of citizens' tax dollars. Therefore, it is the intent of the legislature that Washington state ferries be given the tools necessary to maximize existing capacity and to make the most efficient use of existing assets and tax dollars.

Sec. 2   RCW 47.06.140 and 1998 c 171 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) The legislature declares the following transportation facilities and services to be of statewide significance: The interstate highway system, interregional state principal arterials including ferry connections that serve statewide travel, intercity passenger rail services, intercity high-speed ground transportation, major passenger intermodal terminals excluding all airport facilities and services, the freight railroad system, the Columbia/Snake navigable river system, marine port facilities and services that are related solely to marine activities affecting international and interstate trade, and high-capacity transportation systems serving regions as defined in RCW 81.104.015. The department, in cooperation with regional transportation planning organizations, counties, cities, transit agencies, public ports, private railroad operators, and private transportation providers, as appropriate, shall plan for improvements to transportation facilities and services of statewide significance in the statewide multimodal plan. Improvements to facilities and services of statewide significance identified in the statewide multimodal plan are essential state public facilities under RCW 36.70A.200.
     (2) The department of transportation, in consultation with local governments, shall set level of service standards for state highways and state ferry routes of statewide significance. Although the department shall consult with local governments when setting level of service standards, the department retains authority to make final decisions regarding level of service standards for state highways and state ferry routes of statewide significance. In establishing level of service standards for state highways and state ferry routes of statewide significance, the department shall consider the necessary balance between providing for the free interjurisdictional movement of people and goods and the needs of local communities using these facilities. When setting the level of service standards under this section for state ferry routes, the department may allow for a standard that is adjustable for seasonality.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3   A new section is added to chapter 47.60 RCW to read as follows:
     The definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
     (1) "Adaptive management" means a systematic process for continually improving management policies and practices by learning from the outcomes of operational programs.
     (2) "Capital plan" means the state ferry system plan as described in RCW 47.06.050(2) and adopted by the commission.
     (3) "Capital project" has the same meaning as used in budget instructions developed by the office of financial management.
     (4) "Commission" means the transportation commission created in RCW 47.01.051.
     (5) "Improvement project" has the same meaning as in the budget instructions developed by the office of financial management. If the budget instructions do not define improvement project, then it has the same meaning as "program project" in the budget instructions. If a project meets both the improvement project and preservation project definitions in this section it must be defined as an improvement project. New vessel acquisitions must be defined as improvement projects.
     (6) "Life-cycle cost model" means that portion of a capital asset inventory system which, among other things, is used to estimate future preservation needs.
     (7) "Maintenance cost" has the same meaning as used in budget instructions developed by the office of financial management.
     (8) "Preservation project" has the same meaning as used in budget instructions developed by the office of financial management.
     (9) "Route" means all ferry sailings from one location to another, such as the Seattle to Bainbridge route or the Port Townsend to Keystone route.
     (10) "Sailing" means an individual ferry sailing for a specific route, such as the 5:00 p.m. sailing from Seattle to Bremerton.
     (11) "Travel shed" means one or more ferry routes with distinct, common characteristics as determined by the department.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4   A new section is added to chapter 47.60 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) The commission shall, with the involvement of the department, conduct a survey to gather data on ferry users to help inform level of service, operational, pricing, planning, and investment decisions. The survey must include, but is not limited to:
     (a) Recreational use;
     (b) Walk-on customer use;
     (c) Vehicle customer use;
     (d) Freight and goods movement demand; and
     (e) Reactions to potential operational and pricing strategies described under section 7 of this act and RCW 47.60.290.
     (2) Ferry advisory committees may provide suggestions to the commission regarding the survey.
     (3) The survey must be updated at least every two years and maintained to support the development and implementation of adaptive management of ferry services.

Sec. 5   RCW 47.60.290 and 1983 c 3 s 136 are each amended to read as follows:
     ((Subject to the provisions of RCW 47.60.326,)) (1) The department ((is hereby authorized and directed to)) shall annually review ((tariffs and charges as)) fares and pricing policies applicable to the operation of the Washington state ferries ((for the purpose of establishing a more fair and equitable tariff to be charged passengers, vehicles, and commodities on the routes of the Washington state ferries)).
     (2) Beginning in 2008, the department shall develop fare and pricing policy proposals that must:
     (a) Recognize that each travel shed is unique, and might not have the same farebox recovery rate and the same pricing policies;
     (b) Use data from the current survey conducted under section 4 of this act;
     (c) Be developed with input from affected ferry users by public hearing and by review with the affected ferry advisory committees, in addition to the data gathered from the survey conducted in section 4 of this act;
     (d) Generate the amount of revenue required by the biennial transportation budget; and
     (e) Keep fare schedules as simple as possible.
     (3) While developing fare and pricing policy proposals, the department must consider the following:
     (a) Options for using pricing to level vehicle peak demand; and
     (b) Options for using pricing to increase off-peak ridership.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6   A new section is added to chapter 47.60 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) The commission shall adopt fares and pricing policies by rule, under chapter 34.05 RCW, according to the following schedule:
     (a) Each year the department shall provide the commission a report of its review of fares and pricing policies, with recommendations for the revision of fares and pricing policies for the ensuing year;
     (b) In October of each year, beginning in 2008, the commission shall adopt by rule fares and pricing policies for the ensuing year. The schedule may initially be adopted as an emergency rule if necessary to take effect in, or as near as possible to, the month of October.
     (2) The commission may adopt by rule fares that are effective for more or less than one year for the purposes of transitioning to the fare schedule in subsection (1) of this section.
     (3) The commission may increase ferry fares included in the schedule of charges adopted under this section by a percentage that exceeds the fiscal growth factor.
     (4) The chief executive officer of the ferry system may authorize the use of promotional, discounted, and special event fares to the general public and commercial enterprises for the purpose of maximizing capacity use and the revenues collected by the ferry system. The department shall report to the commission a summary of the promotional, discounted, and special event fares offered during each fiscal year and the financial results from these activities.
     (5) Fare revenues and other revenues deposited in the Puget Sound ferry operations account created in RCW 47.60.530 may not be used to support the Puget Sound capital construction account created in RCW 47.60.505, unless the support for capital is separately identified in the fare.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 7   A new section is added to chapter 47.60 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) The department shall develop, and the commission shall review, operational strategies to ensure that existing assets are fully utilized and to guide future investment decisions. These operational strategies must, at a minimum:
     (a) Recognize that each travel shed is unique and might not have the same operational strategies;
     (b) Use data from the current survey conducted under section 4 of this act;
     (c) Be consistent with vehicle level of service standards;
     (d) Choose the most efficient balance of capital and operating investments by using a life-cycle cost analysis; and
     (e) Use methods of collecting fares that maximize efficiency and achieve revenue management control.
     (2) After the commission reviews recommendations by the department, the commission and department shall make joint recommendations to the legislature for the improvement of operational strategies.
     (3) In developing operational strategies, the following, at a minimum, must be considered:
     (a) The feasibility of using reservation systems;
     (b) Methods of shifting vehicular traffic to other modes of transportation;
     (c) Methods of improving on-dock operations to maximize efficiency and minimize operating and capital costs;
     (d) A cost-benefit analysis of remote holding versus over-water holding;
     (e) Methods of reorganizing holding areas and minimizing on-dock employee parking to maximize the dock size available for customer vehicles;
     (f) Schedule modifications;
     (g) Efficiencies in exit queuing and metering; and
     (h) Interoperability with other transportation services.
     (4) Operational strategies must be reevaluated periodically and, at a minimum, before developing a new capital plan.

Sec. 8   RCW 47.60.330 and 2003 c 374 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) Before a substantial change to the service levels provided to ferry users, the department shall consult with affected ferry users by public hearing and by review with the affected ferry advisory committees.
     (2) Before ((a substantial expansion or curtailment in the level of service provided to ferry users, or a revision in the schedule of ferry tolls or charges)) adding or eliminating a ferry route, the department ((of transportation)) shall consult with affected ferry users and receive legislative approval. ((The consultation shall be: (a) By public hearing in affected local communities; (b) by review with the affected ferry advisory committees pursuant to RCW 47.60.310; (c) by conducting a survey of affected ferry users; or (d) by any combination of (a) through (c).
     Promotional, discount, and special event fares that are not part of the published schedule of ferry charges or tolls are exempt. The department shall report an accounting of all exempt revenues to the transportation commission each fiscal year.
     (2) There is created a ferry system productivity council consisting of a representative of each ferry advisory committee empanelled under RCW 47.60.310, elected by the members thereof, and two representatives of employees of the ferry system appointed by mutual agreement of all of the unions representing ferry employees, which shall meet from time to time with ferry system management to discuss means of improving ferry system productivity.
     (3) Before increasing ferry tolls the department of transportation shall consider all possible cost reductions with full public participation as provided in subsection (1) of this section and, consistent with public policy, shall consider adapting service levels equitably on a route-by-route basis to reflect trends in and forecasts of traffic usage. Forecasts of traffic levels shall be developed by the bond covenant traffic engineering firm appointed under the provisions of RCW 47.60.450. Provisions of this section shall not alter obligations under RCW 47.60.450. Before including any toll increase in a budget proposal by the commission, the department of transportation shall consult with affected ferry users in the manner prescribed in (1)(b) of this section plus the procedure of either (1)(a) or (c) of this section.))

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 9   A new section is added to chapter 47.60 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) Appropriations made for the Washington state ferries capital program may not be used for maintenance costs.
     (2) Appropriations made for preservation projects shall be spent only on preservation and only when warranted by asset condition, and shall not be spent on master plans, right-of-way acquisition, or other nonpreservation items.
     (3) Systemwide and administrative capital program costs shall be allocated to specific capital projects using a cost allocation plan developed by the department. Systemwide and administrative capital program costs shall be identifiable.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 10   A new section is added to chapter 47.60 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) The department shall maintain a life-cycle cost model on capital assets such that:
     (a) Available industry standards are used for estimating the life of an asset, and department-adopted standard life cycles derived from the experience of similar public and private entities are used when industry standards are not available;
     (b) Standard estimated life is adjusted for asset condition when inspections are made;
     (c) It does not include utilities or other systems that are not replaced on a standard life cycle; and
     (d) It does not include assets not yet built.
     (2) All assets in the life-cycle cost model must be inspected and updated in the life-cycle cost model for asset condition at least every three years.
     (3) The life-cycle cost model shall be used when estimating future system preservation needs.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 11   A new section is added to chapter 47.60 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) Preservation funding requests shall only be for assets in the life-cycle cost model.
     (2) Preservation funding requests that exceed five million dollars per project must be accompanied by a predesign study. The predesign study must include all elements required by the office of financial management.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 12   A new section is added to chapter 47.60 RCW to read as follows:
     The department shall develop terminal design standards that:
     (1) Adhere to vehicle level of service standards as described in RCW 47.06.140;
     (2) Adhere to operational strategies as described in section 7 of this act; and
     (3) Choose the most efficient balance between capital and operating investments by using a life-cycle cost analysis.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 13   A new section is added to chapter 47.60 RCW to read as follows:
     The capital plan must adhere to the following:
     (1) A current ridership demand forecast;
     (2) Vehicle level of service standards as described in RCW 47.06.140;
     (3) Operational strategies as described in section 7 of this act; and
     (4) Terminal design standards as described in section 12 of this act.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 14   A new section is added to chapter 47.60 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) Terminal improvement project funding requests must adhere to the capital plan.
     (2) Requests for terminal improvement design and construction funding must be submitted with a predesign study that:
     (a) Includes all elements required by the office of financial management;
     (b) Separately identifies basic terminal elements essential for operation and their costs;
     (c) Separately identifies additional elements to provide ancillary revenue and customer comfort and their costs;
     (d) Includes construction phasing options that are consistent with forecasted ridership increases;
     (e) Separately identifies additional elements requested by local governments and the cost and proposed funding source of those elements;
     (f) Separately identifies multimodal elements and the cost and proposed funding source of those elements; and
     (g) Identifies all contingency amounts.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 15   A new section is added to chapter 47.60 RCW to read as follows:
     (1) The joint legislative audit and review committee shall assess and report as follows:
     (a) Audit the implementation of the cost allocation methodology evaluated under chapter . . . (House Bill No. 1094), Laws of 2007, as it exists on the effective date of this section, assessing whether actual costs are allocated consistently with the methodology, whether there are sufficient internal controls to ensure proper allocation, and the adequacy of staff training; and
     (b) Review the assignment of preservation costs and improvement costs for fiscal year 2009 to determine whether:
     (i) The costs are capital costs;
     (ii) The costs meet the statutory requirements for preservation activities and for improvement activities; and
     (iii) Improvement costs are within the scope of legislative appropriations.
     (2) The report on the evaluations in this section is due by January 31, 2010.
     (3) This section expires December 31, 2010.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 16   The following acts or parts of acts are each repealed:
     (1) RCW 47.60.150 (Fixing of charges -- Deposit of revenues) and 2003 c 374 s 3, 1999 c 94 s 26, & 1990 c 42 s 405; and
     (2) RCW 47.60.326 (Schedule of charges for state ferries -- Review by department, factors considered -- Rule making by commission) and 2005 c 270 s 1, 2003 c 374 s 4, 2001 1st sp.s. c 1 s 1, 1999 c 94 s 27, 1990 c 42 s 406, 1983 c 15 s 25, & 1981 c 344 s 5."