HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1122
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Agriculture & Natural Resources
Title: An act relating to continuing the use of contract harvesting for improving forest health on Washington state trust lands.
Brief Description: Improving forest health on state trust lands by continuing the use of contract harvesting for silvicultural treatments.
Sponsors: Representatives Kretz, VanDeWege, B. Sullivan, Kagi, McCoy, Orcutt, Eickmeyer, Lantz, Warnick, Wallace, Hailey and Dickerson.
Brief History:
Agriculture & Natural Resources: 1/18/07, 1/25/07 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCES
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 15 members: Representatives B. Sullivan, Chair; Blake, Vice Chair; Kretz, Ranking Minority Member; Warnick, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Dickerson, Eickmeyer, Grant, Hailey, Kagi, Lantz, McCoy, Newhouse, Orcutt, Strow and VanDeWege.
Staff: Jaclyn Ford (786-7339).
Background:
The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has the authority to directly contract for the
removal of timber on state forest lands. The DNR contracts with a firm or individual to
perform all the necessary harvesting work to process trees into logs; the DNR then sells the
individual log sorts. The contract harvesting program may not be more than 10 percent of the
total annual volume of timber offered for sale by the DNR. However, all contract harvesting
operations that are conducted primarily for forest health are exempt from the annual 10
percent cap on contract harvesting sales.
Where there are identified health deficiencies in areas of state forest land, the DNR has
authority to use contract harvesting or conduct other silvicultural treatments. All harvesting
and treatments must be intended to improve the health of the forest stand, and must be in
accordance with all applicable forest health plans, laws, and other agreements. The DNR
must also give priority to fulfilling existing forest plans when planning harvesting or other
silvicultural treatments.
Authority to use the contract harvesting program for silviculture expires on December 31,
2007.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
Removes the December 31, 2007 expiration date, and maintains the authority for the DNR to
use contract harvesting for silvicultural treatments on state trust lands with identified health
deficiencies.
If the DNR does not have a current management or landscape plan, the DNR will prioritize
silvicultural treatments for forest health by giving higher priority to the protection of public
health and safety, public resources, and the long-term asset value of the trust.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The original bill did not require the DNR to prioritize certain silvicultural treatments for
forest health by giving higher priority to the protection of public health and safety, public
resources, and the long-term asset value of the trust.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) Forest health is an international issue. Because of fire suppression in the past
there are too many trees inflicted with disease and other problems; thinning stands will
improve these conditions. This is an important tool to improve forest health. Contract
harvesting provides a pathway for the DNR to invest in treatments that they may not
otherwise be able to afford. The Legislature should look into clearly stating that the DNR
should prioritize these treatments for public safety, forest health, and revenue generation.
The Legislature should also look into using biofuels to turn this into a double benefit.
Contract harvesting has given the DNR the ability to treat many acres, but there are more
acres to treat. The board believes these sales are in the best interest of the beneficiaries.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Representative Joel Kretz, prime sponsor; Doug Sutherland and Bruce Mackey, Department of Natural Resources; Bill Robinson, Nature Conservancy; Brenda Hood, Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction; Miguel Perez-Gibson, Audubon Washington; and Tim Boyd, Vaagen Brothers Lumber.