HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1910
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Housing
Title: An act relating to tax incentives for certain multiple-unit dwellings in urban centers that provide affordable housing.
Brief Description: Modifying property tax exemption provisions relating to new and rehabilitated multiple-unit dwellings in urban centers to provide affordable housing requirements.
Sponsors: Representatives Ormsby, Fromhold, Miloscia, Dunshee, Kenney, Appleton, Darneille, Hasegawa and Morrell.
Brief History:
Housing: 2/5/07, 2/26/07 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HOUSING
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 4 members: Representatives Miloscia, Chair; Springer, Vice Chair; Kelley and Ormsby.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 3 members: Representatives Dunn, Ranking Minority Member; McCune and Schindler.
Staff: Robyn Dupuis (786-7166).
Background:
New, rehabilitated, or converted multi-unit housing projects in targeted residential areas are
eligible for a 10-year property tax exemption offered by eligible and participating cities. The
property tax exemption may be applied to new housing construction and to the increased
value of a building due to rehabilitation. The exemption does not apply to the land or the
non-housing improvements. If the property changes use before the 10 year exemption ends,
then back taxes are recovered based on the difference between the taxes paid and the taxes
that would have been paid without the tax exemption.
Cities with a population of at least 30,000 or the largest city or town in a county planning
under the Growth Management Act (GMA) may offer the multi-unit housing property tax
exemption.
There are a variety of requirements all multi-unit housing projects must meet to be eligible
for a tax exemption, including:
Fifty cities qualify to utilize the tax exemption program. Sixteen cities have utilized the program. Two cities (Seattle and Kirkland) include affordable housing requirements for multi-unit housing projects.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
Cities eligible to offer the multi-unit housing property tax exemption are those with a
population of at least 15,000 people, or the largest city or town located in a county planning
under the GMA.
Housing Affordability Component
Cities must adopt and implement an affordable housing requirement for properties applying
for property tax exemptions. The requirement must provide for mixed-income housing that
includes a percentage of units that are affordable to low and moderate-income households.
The affordable housing requirement must be implemented by December 1, 2007.
Owners of properties seeking a tax exemption under this chapter after the effective date of
this act must comply with city affordable housing requirements.
Properties receiving a tax exemption must report to the city annually on data including the
total number of units produced, the total development cost of each unit, the monthly rental or
sale amount of each unit, the income of each renter at occupancy, and the first homeowner of
any unit sold.
Other Changes
At the discretion of the local government, the exemption of individual dwelling units is
allowed. In such cases, the tax exemption would be limited to the value of the qualifying
improvements within those individual dwelling units.
Reporting Requirement
Beginning in 2007, all cities issuing tax exemptions must report annually to the Department
of Community, Trade and Economic Development (DCTED) regarding tax exempt
properties. The annual report must include the following:
All cities issuing tax exemptions, and receiving over $500,000 in housing-related state
monies and financing through the Washington State Housing Finance Commission and
specific local housing related surcharges, must apply to the Washington State Quality Award
program once every three years.
The DCTED may also establish performance measures on which the cities must report.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The specific affordable housing requirement is removed and replaced with a mandate that
cities establish an affordable housing requirement by December 1, 2007. This affordable
housing requirement must provide for mixed-income housing. Cities are also required to
report to the DCTED regarding the nature of properties receiving the benefit of tax
exemptions. The reference to workforce housing is removed. The act is applicable to all
cities issuing tax exemptions as well as to all projects which apply for tax exemptions after
the effective date of the act.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support of original bill) This bill is about helping lower and middle income individuals
and families live closer to their places of work and also about increasing density in our cities.
If the state is providing a tax exemption there should be some sort of affordable housing
component to the requirements of participation in the program.
(Opposed to original bill) The multi-unit tax exemption program is a tool given to the cities
to help them achieve their GMA goals. The program is working well now to promote in-fill
and increase density. Imposing strict affordable housing restrictions might cripple the
program. Although some areas of some cities have really been successful in implementing
the program, there is much work to be done in other areas of cities where development has
not caught on. Furthermore, only 16 of the 50 cities eligible have even used the program so
far.
Persons Testifying: (In support of original bill) Representative Ormsby, prime sponsor; and
Nick Federici, Washington Low Income Housing Alliance.
(Opposed to original bill) Randall Lewis, City of Tacoma; Doug Levy, Cities of Everett,
Kent, Renton, Federal Way and Puyallup; Robert Carleton, Washington Association of
County Assessors; and Bill Riley, Washington Association of Realtors.