HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 2558


This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Reported by House Committee On:
Ecology & Parks

Title: An act relating to exempting certain minor new construction associated with construction storm water general permits from the state environmental policy act.

Brief Description: Exempting certain minor new construction associated with construction storm water general permits from SEPA.

Sponsors: Representatives Upthegrove, Clibborn, O'Brien, Kenney and Rolfes; by request of Department of Ecology.

Brief History:

Ecology & Parks: 1/18/08, 1/22/08 [DP].

Brief Summary of Bill
  • Exempts certain construction storm water projects from the State Environmental Policy Act.


HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ECOLOGY & PARKS

Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Upthegrove, Chair; Rolfes, Vice Chair; Sump, Ranking Minority Member; Dickerson, Dunshee, Eickmeyer, Kristiansen, O'Brien and Pearson.

Staff: Jaclyn Ford (786-7339).

Background:

In 2005 the Department of Ecology (DOE) issued a new construction storm water general permit to meet the requirements of the Clean Water Act. The permit requires construction projects that disturb one or more acres of land to get a storm water permit from the DOE before the start of construction. Because of the permit requirement, local governments are required to do a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review of the project. A SEPA review requires an environmental impact statement be written in order for the project to begin.


Summary of Bill:

A new construction storm water project does not need to have a SEPA review if it disturbs less than five acres. The exemption does not occur if the project is being constructed in an environmentally sensitive area.


Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Not requested.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) The current law simply adds a regulatory burden without environmental benefits. This bill would correct the unintended consequences of additional workload for local governments. The requirement of a SEPA evaluation under current law adds time and cost without any additional benefits.

(Opposed) None.

Persons Testifying: Representative Upthegrove, prime sponsor; Tom Clingman, Department of Ecology; Harry Reinert, King County; and Andy Cook, Building Industry Association of Washington.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.