HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 2679
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Education
Appropriations
Title: An act relating to improving educational outcomes for students in foster care.
Brief Description: Creating programs to improve educational outcomes for students in foster care.
Sponsors: Representatives Roberts, Pettigrew, Hunt, Hasegawa, Sullivan, Chase, Morrell, McIntire, Santos, Barlow, Simpson, Kenney, Goodman, Wood, Darneille, Lantz and McDonald.
Brief History:
Education: 1/25/08, 2/4/08 [DP];
Appropriations: 2/8/08 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Quall, Chair; Barlow, Vice Chair; Priest, Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Haigh, Liias, Roach, Santos and Sullivan.
Staff: Cece Clynch (786-7195).
Background:
The Puget Sound Educational Service District (PSESD) is one of nine educational service
districts in Washington. The PSESD includes 35 school districts in King and Pierce counties
plus Bainbridge Island. The students in the PSESD constitute about 38 percent of K-12
public school students in the state.
The educational stability and continuity of school placement for children in foster care has
been a topic of legislation in Washington for the past several years. In 2002 the Legislature
directed the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS), in cooperation with the
Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI), to convene a working group and
prepare a plan to address educational stability and continuity for school-age children entering
short-term foster care, and assure that the best interest of the child is a primary consideration
in the school placement of a child in short-term foster care.
In response to the recommendations made by the working group, the 2003 Legislature
enacted a state policy that, whenever practical and in the best interest of the child, children
placed into foster care must remain enrolled in the schools they were attending at the time
they entered foster care. Administrative regions of the DSHS were directed to develop
protocols with school districts specifying strategies for communication, coordination, and
collaboration regarding the status and progress of foster children placed in the region.
To accomplish these tasks the DSHS was directed to establish an oversight committee to
develop strategies for maintaining foster children in the schools they were attending at the
time they entered foster care and to work with the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
to develop protocols to ensure that educational stability is addressed during the shelter care
hearing.
The 2005 Legislature expanded the membership of the oversight committee to include the
Higher Education Coordinating Board (HECB), foster youth, former foster youth, and foster
parents. The scope of responsibilities of the oversight committee was also expanded to
include promotion of opportunities for foster youth to participate in post-secondary education
or training.
In 2007 the HECB was directed to create a six year pilot program to provide outreach,
information, and scholarships to foster children to enable them to pursue post-secondary
education.
Summary of Bill:
Foster Care Program Supervisor. Subject to the availability of funds, the PSESD is directed
to designate a foster care program supervisor. Some of the duties of the supervisor include:
Annual Report by the OSPI. The OSPI is required to provide an annual report to the
Legislature regarding the educational experiences and progress of the children in out-of-home
care. This information must be disaggregated to the extent allowable by privacy laws in
order to show which school districts are experiencing the greatest challenges and successes.
Grant Program. Subject to the availability of funds, the PSESD is to create a grant program
for local school districts to improve stability and educational outcomes for students in foster
care. The grants are to be awarded to the districts with the highest incidence of Child
Protective Services (CPS) removals and foster care placements. The grant money must
supplement, not supplant, current funding. Grant money may be used for activities such as
tutoring, transportation, and additional counseling support as well as for fees normally
covered by parents for such items as extracurricular activities, school pictures, and yearbooks.
The PSESD must submit an annual report to the Legislature regarding grant program
outcomes.
School District-Based Foster Care Recruitment Pilot Programs. Subject to the availability
of funds, the DSHS funds two school district-based pilot programs. These pilot programs are
to coordinate with existing foster care recruitment contracts. Funds may be used to expand
existing contracts or fund the DSHS Children's Administration staff. The DSHS is to report
annually to the Legislature on the increase or decrease of foster homes within the pilot areas.
Release of Educational Records to the DSHS. School districts are required to respond within
two school days to requests from the DSHS for records of children in foster care.
Appropriation: The following appropriations are made for the Fiscal Year 2009 from the General Fund: $585,000 for an additional nine Educational Advocacy Coordinators in the DSHS Children's Administration; $108,000 to the DSHS for the two district-based foster care recruitment pilot programs; $50,000 for a foster care program supervisor at the PSESD; and, $200,000 for the grant program to be administered by the PSESD.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 16, 2008.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) Most foster children have a difficult time in school. Only 2 percent of foster
children go on to get their Bachelor of Arts and only 35 percent graduate from high school on
time. There is a need for educational advocates and others to help these children get the
educational and social services that they need. Educational advocates provide a vital link and
assist with seeing that children get the proper services in the schools. Foster children do
much better when they receive the appropriate services. This bill includes some important,
practical steps to improve outcomes. It is very difficult for foster children when they have to
change schools and there are often a lack of foster families available in the school area from
which they come. The OSPI has provided tremendous leadership with this issue. It is
suggested that there be a foster care program supervisor at the OSPI as well as at the PSESD.
There should be coordination with the Workforce Training and Education Coordinating
Board also.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Representative Roberts, prime sponsor; Janis Avery, Treehouse; Geton Peters; Martin Mueller, Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction; Wes Pruitt, Workforce Board; Laurie Lippold, Children's Home Society; and Toni S. Hartsfield, Olympic College.
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 26 members: Representatives Sommers, Chair; Dunshee, Vice Chair; Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Chandler, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Ericks, Fromhold, Green, Haigh, Hunt, Kagi, Kessler, Linville, McIntire, Morrell, Pettigrew, Priest, Ross, Schmick, Schual-Berke, Seaquist, Sullivan and Walsh.
Staff: Kelci Karl-Robinson (786-7109).
Summary of Recommendation of Committee On Appropriations Compared to
Recommendation of Committee On Education:
The Appropriations Committee removed the appropriation and added a null and void clause,
making the bill null and void unless funded in the budget.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed. However, the bill is null and void unless funded in the budget.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) Over the years, the Legislature has shown considerable interest in educational
outcomes for children in foster care. Traditionally, foster youth underachieve compared to
their peers. The 30-35 percent of youth aging out of foster care do so with a high school
diploma or GED. Only 20-25 percent of foster children remain in the same school once they
enter foster care. This transition leads to poor educational outcomes. Educational stability is
the key factor in improving educational outcomes for foster youth. Students experiencing
abrupt school changes during the school year lose, on average, 10 months of educational
progress. By dedicating resources to local training, technical assistance, interagency
agreements between school districts and the Children's Administration regional offices,
grants to school districts, school-based recruitment pilots, and educational advocates will
have a significant positive impact on educational outcomes. It would be beneficial to add a
statewide foster care program supervisor to the staff at the OSPI at an approximate cost of
$50,000.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Laurie Lippold, Children's Home Society of Washington; and Martin Mueller, Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction.