HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 3349
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Commerce & Labor
Appropriations
Title: An act relating to a sunrise review of the need for single-family residential contractor licensing.
Brief Description: Providing a review of the need for residential contractor licensing.
Sponsors: Representatives Ericks, Eddy, Kelley, Conway, Springer and Rolfes.
Brief History:
Commerce & Labor: 2/7/08 [DPS];
Appropriations: 2/11/08 [DP2S(w/o sub CL)].
Brief Summary of Second Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE & LABOR
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 6 members: Representatives Conway, Chair; Wood, Vice Chair; Condotta, Ranking Minority Member; Chandler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Crouse and Moeller.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 2 members: Representatives Green and Williams.
Staff: Jill Reinmuth (786-7134).
Background:
Contractor Registration
The Contractor Registration Act (Act) requires contractors to register with the Department of
Labor and Industries. "Contractor" is defined as including any person who undertakes to
construct, alter, repair, add to, subtract from, improve, develop, move, wreck, or demolish
any building or other structure.
An applicant for registration must submit a form that contains certain information, including
the applicant's Unified Business Identifier (UBI) number. The applicant must also file a
surety bond and furnish proof of liability insurance.
An applicant is not required to have work experience, take classes, pass an examination, or
otherwise demonstrate competence in the construction trade or knowledge of the applicable
laws to register. (Applicants seeking to register as electrical and plumbing contractors,
however, must meet additional requirements.)
Sunrise Review
The Legislature may request the Department of Licensing (DOL) to conduct a sunrise review
of proposals for regulation of professions not currently regulated. The sunrise review law
states legislative intent that a business profession should be regulated only to protect the
public interest. Further, a business profession should be regulated by the state only when:
Under the sunrise review law, a group proposing to be regulated or any other interested party
which proposes that a profession be regulated ("applicant group") must address a list of
factors to the extent requested by the Legislature. These factors include a definition of the
problem, the efforts made to address the problem, the alternatives considered, the benefit to
the public if regulation is granted, and the extent to which regulation might harm the public.
The DOL has adopted a sunrise process, which includes conducting a public hearing on the
report submitted by the applicant group. The DOL then reports to the Legislature on the
background of the proposal, the DOL's findings, and the DOL's advisory recommendations.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
The Department of Licensing (DOL) is required to conduct a sunrise review of the need for
regulation of contractors involved in the repair, alteration, or construction of single-family
homes. In conducting the review, the DOL must:
By October 1, 2008, the DOL must submit to appropriate legislative committees its
recommendations regarding the need for regulation, and if regulation is recommended, the
minimum qualifications that should be required.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The parties with whom the Department of Licensing must consult include consumers and
legal authorities. Public hearings are required to allow for industry and consumer testimony.
Data used in conducting the sunrise review includes data gathered throughout the research
process.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) There is support for both the original bill and the proposed substitute bill. There
were issues raised last year regarding home warranties and contractor liability. During the
interim, we examined the issue, met with stakeholders, and looked for a starting place. There
is support from key stakeholders to begin with sunset review. They view this as the first
order of business in considering contractor licensing.
We support this legislation. This is an inclusive, appropriate, and measured process. This is
a useful, baseline inquiry. The proposed substitute bill, by adding public hearings, adds
sunshine to sunrise review. It also makes sense to add legal authorities to the parties with
whom the Department of Licensing will consult. We look forward to working on this issue
over the interim.
(Neutral) Suggested changes are based on what we have learned while conducting other
sunrise reviews.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Ericks, prime sponsor; Representative
Eddy; Amy Brackenbury, Building Industry Association of Washington; Bill Stauffacher,
Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers of Washington; and Mel Sorensen, Professional
Insurance Agents Association of Washington.
(Neutral) Barbara Sandahl, Department of Licensing; and Patrick Woods, Department of
Labor and Industries.
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Majority Report: The second substitute bill be substituted therefor and the second substitute bill do pass and do not pass the substitute bill by Committee on Commerce & Labor. Signed by 32 members: Representatives Sommers, Chair; Dunshee, Vice Chair; Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Bailey, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Haler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Chandler, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Ericks, Fromhold, Grant, Green, Haigh, Hinkle, Hunt, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Kretz, Linville, McIntire, Morrell, Pettigrew, Priest, Ross, Schmick, Schual-Berke, Seaquist, Sullivan and Walsh.
Staff: Owen Rowe (786-7391).
Summary of Recommendation of Committee On Appropriations Compared to
Recommendation of Committee On Commerce & Labor:
A null and void clause was added, making the bill null and void unless funded in the budget.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Second Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed. However, the bill is null and void unless funded in the budget.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: None.
Persons Testifying: None.