HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 3381
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Appropriations
Title: An act relating to fees to implement programs that protect and improve Washington's health, safety, education, employees, and consumers. .
Brief Description: Relating to fees to implement programs that protect and improve Washington's health, safety, education, employees, and consumers.
Sponsors: Representative Sommers.
Brief History:
Appropriations: 3/7/08 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 22 members: Representatives Sommers, Chair; Dunshee, Vice Chair; Cody, Conway, Darneille, Ericks, Fromhold, Grant, Green, Haigh, Hunt, Hunter, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Linville, McIntire, Morrell, Pettigrew, Schual-Berke, Seaquist and Sullivan.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 11 members: Representatives Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Bailey, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Haler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Chandler, Kretz, McDonald, Priest, Ross, Schmick and Walsh.
Staff: Kristen Fraser (786-7148).
Background:
Many state agency activities are supported by fee revenue. In contrast to taxes, which are
charges levied for the general support of government, fees are typically part of a program that
regulates a profession, industry, or activity, and they are intended to support the cost of
administering that program. Examples of regulatory fees include license fees, inspection
fees, and examination fees. Other types of fees are user fees, in which a person pays a charge
for using a publicly-owned or publicly-provided service or facility. Examples of user fees are
higher education tuition and state parks campsite fees.
Some fees are established in statute by the Legislature. In other cases, the Legislature has
delegated to state agencies the ability to establish fees and to determine the amounts of those
fees. For example, the Legislature has delegated to the Department of Licensing (DOL) the
authority to license and regulate various business and occupations, and it has directed the
DOL to establish fees for each profession at a level sufficient to defray the costs of
administering that program.
State law limits agencies' ability to increase fees. Initiative 601, adopted in 1993, prohibited
state agencies from raising fees in excess of the fiscal growth factor without prior legislative
approval. Initiative 601 did not restrict the creation of new fees. In 2007, Initiative 960
modified fee increase restrictions to prohibit state agencies from imposing new fees or
increasing fees by any amount without prior legislative approval. In addition, bills that
authorize fee increases or new fees are subject to Initiative 960s publicity and projection
provisions, under which the Office of Financial Management must provide public notice of
the legislation, along with 10-year projections of the estimated cost to taxpayers.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
The Legislature finds that regulatory programs to protect health, safety, employees, and
consumers may require that the cost of those programs be borne by the regulated industry or
profession rather than the taxpayers as a whole.
The Legislature authorizes new fees and fee increases in certain agencies as specified in the
bill.
Department of Financial Institutions
Gambling Commission
Department of Labor & Industries
In addition, the Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) is authorized to implement fee increases in the following programs as specified in the bill:
Department of Health
Department of Ecology
Department of Agriculture
Department of Licensing
Higher Education
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The original bill contained a declaration of intent to increase fees to protect health, safety,
education, employees and consumers. The substitute bill adds authorization to increase fees
and establish new fees as specified in the bill.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on March 8, 2008.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill contains an emergency clause and takes effect immediately, except for section 2, which takes effect July 1, 2008; sections 15 through 26, which take effect January 1, 2009; and sections 40 through 45, which take effect July 1, 2008.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) Approving the animal inspection fee is important. The mixed waste
management fee increase is crucial to the Hanford clean-up.
The Department of Licensing (DOL) appreciates the authorization to increase fees in the bail
bond recovery agents. Please approve other fee increases for the DOL. Fraud was found in
the private third party tester program for truck drivers, and the DOL needs the skills testing
fee to protect the public. Other programs crucial to public safety and protecting consumers
are security guard and real estate appraiser licensing.
The labor and industry representatives of the Public Works Advisory Committee support the
increase in fees for filing the intent statements and affidavits of wages under the prevailing
wage program. The program hasn't seen a fee increase for 15 years and this is impairing the
Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) ability to enforce the prevailing wage laws.
Please support the fee increase for the prevailing wage intent statements and wage affidavits.
The Public Works Advisory Committee supports this increase to fund enforcement and the
Department of L&I's responsibilities.
Fee increases are needed to maintain services performed by the Department of Ecology
(DOE). The DOE fees are critical for the Hanford clean-up. The dam inspection and
construction permit fees are also important – we haven't had a dam failure and we want to
keep it that way.
Please support fee increases to fund background checks and other activities related to real
estate licensure as approved by the Legislature in SHB 2778.
Please support the fee increases in the pesticide licensing and registration program. This
program is funded by fees and has not seen an increase in 11 years. The Department of
Agriculture needs these fees to keep agriculture productive.
Please support the increases to pesticide licensing and registration fees.
Community banks support the Department of Financial Institution's (DFI) fee increase – the
increase is needed to support the DFI's mission. Please authorize a fee increase for the
Christmas tree growers.
The Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) supports the sections that authorize fee
increases in the prevailing wage, factory assembled structures, and explosives programs.
Other fees collected by L&I are also important, including the boiler and plumbers' programs.
These fees protect public safety.
(In support with concerns) Under I-960, all fee increases require legislative approval. The list
of fees the committee is considering is very small compared to the list of fee increases that
require approval. The Office of Financial Management received a list of over 390 agency
fees that require legislative approval in order to be increased. Absent approval for these
increases, agencies will have insufficient revenue and won't be able to maintain their
activities to protect public health and safety.
The Gambling Commission (Commission) is a self-funded law enforcement agency that sets
fees as necessary to implement the costs of its program. The Commission can no longer
absorb these costs. Before 2007 the Commission had not increased fees for five years.
Stakeholders do not oppose the Commission's proposal to increase fees. If the increases are
not approved, the Commission's law enforcement activities will suffer.
The University of Washington faculty support the amendment to authorize tuition and fee
increases as previously authorized in law. The faculty support moderate and well-planned
tuition increasees.
The Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) operates from a dedicated, non-appropriated,
fee-based account. Work in the mortgage broker program has increased due to the subprime
lending crisis. The only comment from stakeholders about our fees is that they are not high
enough. The credit unions program within the DFI last received a fee increase in 2002 and an
increase is needed to continue this crucial work.
Please include the two-year higher education institutions request for authority to increase
tuition and fees. Our biennial budget plans assume these increases that were previously
authorized in the budget bill. If the State Board for Community and Technical Colleges and
the colleges are unable to achieve these increases, it will harm the ability to respond to
employers by helping provide skilled employees.
The Legislature authorized licensure for athletic trainers last year, and the Department of
Health's ability to establish a license fee schedule was caught up in the I-960 issue. Please
authorize these new fees.
Please support the amendment to add authority to increase fees for dental assistants. The
Department of Health needs this increase to go forward with the program
Thank you for the authorization to increase fees in the Department of Health (DOH) to
implement 4SHB 1103. The DOH needs additional approval to exercise its fee-setting
authority that is already in statute for health professions. In addition, the DOH needs
authority to increase fees for certifying facilities such as in-home services and residential
treatment – the DOH needs to conduct these certifications to comply with federal Medicaid
law. The DOH also inspects devices such as X-ray machines and radioactive devices. The
DOH's ability to protect the public is impaired without authorization to increase these fees.
Please support the amendment to add physical therapist licensing fees. Without these fees,
the licensing program won't provided the intended public protection.
(With concerns) The Solicitor General has advised higher education institutions that the
previously approved tuition and fee increases must be re-authorized. There is a long list of
these fees because higher education has many fee-supported services and activities.
Please add higher education tuition and fees to the bill. Student fees need to grow to support
important services such as child care centers and health services. The institutions have
increased fees responsibly and haven't always used all the increase authority they have been
given. Course and workshop fees are important – Washington State University could not
start up the executive MBA program without an authorization to increase fees.
Eastern Washington Univeristy's main concern is realizing the 5 percent tuition increase that
was previously authorized..
Please authorize higher education fee increases. The institutions should have the authority to
collect fees approved by student leadership.
Higher education institutions plan on an academic year, not a fiscal year, and they thought
that the previously authorized tuition increase authority was sufficient. These previously
authorized increases are needed to fund collective bargaining agreements. Also, many higher
education programs are fee-based. The aviation program is one of just a few west of the
Mississippi and relies on fee support. Please pass the amendment supported by the Council
of Presidents.
Increases for higher education tuition and fees are very important. Please pass the
amendment supported by the Council of Presidents.
Western Washington University would face cuts if the previously approved tuition increases
were not approved; debt service would be affected. Summer session is self-supported and a
fee increase is needed to fund it. Please support authorization for tuition and fee increases.
Microsoft supports the Council of Presidents' amendment to add authorization to increase
higher education tuition and fees.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Mary Beth Lang, Department of Agriculture; Sharon
Whitehead, Department of Licensing; Jim Jessernig, Washington State Potato Commission
and Agri Beef Company; Brad Tower, Community Bankers of Washington; Rick Slunaker,
Associated General Contractors; Dan Coyne, Far West Agribusiness and Crop Life
America-Responsible Industry for a Sound Environment; Jay Manning, Director, Department
of Ecology; Patrick Woods, Department of Labor and Industries; Bob Mitchell, Washington
Realtors; and Dave Johnson, Washington State Building and Trades Council.
(In support with concerns) Deborah Bortner, Linda Jekel, and Brad Williamson, Department
of Financial Institutions; Terry Westhoff, Washington State Gambling Commission; J. W.
Harrington, University of Washington; Mary Selecky, Secretary, Department of Health;
Victor Moore, Director, Office of Financial Management; Chris Cheney, Washington Dairy
Federation, Washington Fryer Commission and Hop Growers of Washington; Charlie Brown,
Washington State Athletic Trainers Association; Melissa Johnson, Physical Therapy
Association; Charlie Earl, State Board for Community and Technical Colleges; and David
Michener, Washington State Dental Association.
(With concerns) Ann Anderson, Central Washington University; David Buri, Eastern
Washington University; Greg Pierce, Microsoft; Terry Teale, Council of Presidents; Randy
Hodgins, University of Washington; Sarah Ishmael, Washington Student Lobby; Sherry
Burkey, Western Washington University; and Larry Ganders, Washington State University.