HOUSE BILL REPORT
2ESSB 5905
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Appropriations
Title: An act relating to certificate of capital authorization.
Brief Description: Concerning certificate of capital authorization.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Franklin, Pflug, Keiser, Tom, Zarelli, Marr and Carrell).
Brief History:
Appropriations: 3/1/08, 3/3/08 [DP].
Brief Summary of Second Engrossed Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 34 members: Representatives Sommers, Chair; Dunshee, Vice Chair; Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Bailey, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Haler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Chandler, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Ericks, Fromhold, Grant, Green, Haigh, Hinkle, Hunt, Hunter, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Kretz, Linville, McDonald, McIntire, Morrell, Pettigrew, Priest, Ross, Schmick, Schual-Berke, Seaquist, Sullivan and Walsh.
Staff: Carma Matti (786-7140).
Background:
In order to receive Medicaid funding for construction costs above $2 million, a skilled
nursing facility needs a certificate of capital authorization (CCA) from the Department of
Social and Health Services (DSHS). An approved CCA allows the investment and
depreciation associated with the nursing home's capital project to be included in their
Medicaid reimbursement rate. In order to obtain a CCA, the nursing facility must:
Completed applications are reviewed and approved on a first-come, first-serve basis.
Projects not approved in one appropriation period have priority in the subsequent period. The
DSHS has the authority to give priority to a project that is necessitated by an emergency
situation as determined by DSHS rules.
Since 2006, the total dollar amount of capital authorizations as set in the biennial
appropriations act has been $16 million per fiscal year. Prior to 2006, this amount was $32
million per year.
Summary of Bill:
Certificates of capital authorizations (CCA) are based on priority rather than first-come, first-serve. Applications for renovations or replacement of existing facilities are given priority
over applications for new facilities. Priority for existing facilities is based on the greatest
length of time since the building's last major renovation or construction. New facilities
receive last priority and will be treated on a first-come, first-serve basis against other new
facilities. The DSHS has authority to give first priority to projects that are necessitated by an
emergency situation defined as construction or renovation needed as soon as possible to:
(1) retain a facilities license or certification;
(2) protect the health or safety of the facility's residents; and
(3) avoid closure.
The DSHS is authorized to establish rules regarding the prioritization for processing CCAs,
and the time period during which applications for CCAs will be accepted and for which
authorizations will remain valid.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) This bill establishes a policy for how we use very limited funds. The policy
ought to be to renovate or reconstruct existing facilities so we can keep the stock of nursing
facilities in good shape all across Washington. We believe there is good flexibility for the
DSHS to determine an emergency. We worked closely with the DSHS on this bill for two
years. This bill establishes an important improvement to the process and puts the facilities in
the front of the line that are most in need of renovation and replacement. The bill takes steps
toward improving the process and may need to be worked on down the road. We would also
appreciate some recognition of new models to be included in the process such as Eden
Alternatives and Green House models of care.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Gary Weeks, Washington Health Care Association; and Deb Murphy, Washington Association of Housing and Services for the Aging.