Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Community & Economic Development & Trade Committee | |
HB 1091
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Promoting innovation partnership zones.
Sponsors: Representatives VanDeWege, Chase, Upthegrove, Miloscia, B. Sullivan, O'Brien, P. Sullivan, Morrell, Sells, Kenney, Rolfes, Kelley, Moeller, Wallace and Eddy; by request of Governor Gregoire.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 1/24/07
Staff: Tracey Taylor (786-7196).
Background:
In 2006, the Governor's Global Competitiveness Council (Council) issued their report "Rising to
the Challenge of Global Competition." The Council's Research and Innovation Committee
(Committee) Report found that research and innovation creates a cycle of development that
yields increased living standards and globally competitive businesses. The Committee and
Council proposed a broad 10-year plan that connects the importance of strong research and
innovation with the creation of jobs, healthy economic growth and a high standard of living and
broad opportunity throughout the state's economy, reaching people of all backgrounds and in all
the state's geographic locations.
Summary of Bill:
The Director of the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (DCTED)
may designate areas in Washington as an "Innovation Partnership Zone" (IPZ).
In order to be designated an IPZ, an area must have three types of institutions within their
boundaries: a university or college fostering commercially valuable research or a national
laboratory; the dense proximity of globally competitive firms in a research-based industry or
industries; and training capacity either within the IPZ or readily accessible to the IPZ. In
addition, the IPZ must have identifiable boundaries that contain dense concentrations of leading
companies, research capacity and skills, or show evidence of planning and partnerships that will
produce such concentrations within an identifiable period of time. An IPZ must be sufficiently
small and distinct so that workers and companies have a unique affinity for the area with the IPZ.
Also, an IPZ must include unused or otherwise potentially available property to allow for future
expansion. Local zoning and economic conditions must provide evidence that such capacity for
expansion exists. The IPZ must be administered by an Economic Development Council, port,
Workforce Development Council, city or county.
Annually on October 1, the Director of the DCTED shall designate IPZs based on a review and
evaluation of applications applying the legislative criteria, the estimated economic impact of the
IPZ and the evidence of forward planning for the IPZ. The Director shall designate the IPZ
Administrator. An IPZ designation shall be for a four-year period, after which the IPZ must
reapply for the designation.
If the IPZ meets the other requirements of the fund source, then the IPZ may be eligible for the
Local Infrastructure Financing Tool program, the sales and use tax for public facilities in rural
counties and the Job Skills program.
The DCTED must convene an annual information sharing event for IPZ Administrators and
other interested parties.
IPZs are required to provide performance measures as prescribed the DCTED. These measures
must include, but are not limited to, private investment measures, job creation measures, and
measures of innovation.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Preliminary fiscal note available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.