HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1141
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Human Services
Title: An act relating to destruction of diversion records.
Brief Description: Modifying diversion records provisions.
Sponsors: Representatives Roberts, Haler, O'Brien, Green, Goodman, Kagi, Appleton, Walsh, Williams, Dickerson, Darneille, Flannigan, McCoy, Hinkle, Pettigrew and Hasegawa.
Brief History:
Human Services: 1/23/07, 1/30/07 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 8 members: Representatives Dickerson, Chair; Roberts, Vice Chair; Ahern, Ranking Minority Member; Walsh, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Bailey, Darneille, McCoy and O'Brien.
Staff: Sonja Hallum (786-7092).
Background:
If a prosecuting attorney receives a report from law enforcement of an alleged offense, the
prosecutor screens the complaint to determine whether there is juvenile court jurisdiction
over the alleged offense and whether there is probable cause to believe that the juvenile
committed the offense.
If the prosecutor determines the case is legally sufficient, the prosecutor is required to divert
the case if the alleged offense is a misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor, or violation and the
alleged offense is the offender's first offense or violation.
When the case is referred to Diversion, the juvenile will sign a contract in which the juvenile
agrees to fulfill certain obligations in lieu of prosecution. These obligations may include
restitution, community service, and counseling as well as other possible obligations. If the
offense is very minor, the diversion counselor may counsel the juvenile and release him or
her from further obligation. This is known as a counsel and release.
If a diversion contract is signed and the juvenile fails to follow the terms of the contract, the
contract may be terminated by the court and the case re-referred to the prosecuting attorney to
decide whether to file formal charges and bring the juvenile into the court system.
If the juvenile completes the terms of the contract, the juvenile's obligation ends and the
offense is reflected on the juvenile's criminal history.
The juvenile's history in the official juvenile court file is open to the public unless the file has
been sealed by court order or destroyed. A person's juvenile record may be destroyed in only
the following circumstances:
1) if the person who is 18 years of age or older requests the court destroy his or her record,
the criminal history consists of only one diversion, and two years has passed since the
diversion was completed;
2) if the person who is 23 years of age or older requests the court destroy his or her record,
the criminal history consists of only diversion referrals which have been successfully
completed, and there are no criminal proceedings pending against the person; or
3) if the juvenile justice care agency has developed routine procedures for destroying records
when two years have elapsed since the completion of the agreement and the person who is the
subject of the information or complaint has turned 23 years of age or older or the person is 18
years of age and his or her criminal history consists of only one diversion agreement.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
The criminal history records of a person who is 18 years of age must be automatically
destroyed if the criminal history consists of only one diversion or a counsel and release which
was successfully completed and there is no restitution owing in the case.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
Adds cases which were disposed of through a counsel and release to the history which may
be automatically destroyed.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) This bill is almost identical to the one passed out of the House last year that ran
out of time and died in the Senate. This bill is a matter of fairness. If a juvenile completes a
deferred disposition it is removed, but a diversion stays on a person's record. Diversions deal
with kids who commit very minor offenses. Often this is the biggest deal the family has ever
dealt with and they just want to put it behind them. Eighty-one percent of youth who go
through diversion never come back. The youth never returns to juvenile court and they forget
about it until the youth is trying to join the military, get a job, or get a scholarship to school.
Ninety-five percent of youth never have their record sealed. Only records where there is one
diversion and no restitution owing can be destroyed. Last year we heard from a youth who
received an engineering degree and was offered a job as an engineer, but lost the offer when
his criminal history revealed a diversion when he was a young boy.
(With concerns) If the purpose is to remove criminal history, this doesn't destroy all the
criminal history. It doesn't destroy the records of law enforcement.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (In Support) Representative Roberts, prime sponsor; and Charles
Shelan and Jim St. Ours, Community Youth Services.
(With concerns) Martha Harden Cesar, Superior Court Judges Association and Washington
Association of Juvenile Court Administrators.