HOUSE BILL REPORT
SHB 1238
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House:
February 14, 2007
Title: An act relating to water-sewer districts.
Brief Description: Revising provisions relating to water-sewer districts.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Local Government (originally sponsored by Representatives Takko, Curtis, Simpson and Moeller).
Brief History:
Local Government: 1/23/07, 1/30/07 [DPS].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 2/14/07, 95-0.
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Simpson, Chair; Eddy, Vice Chair; Curtis, Ranking Minority Member; Schindler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Ross, B. Sullivan and Takko.
Staff: Thamas Osborn (786-7129).
Background:
Powers and Authority of Water-Sewer Districts
Water-sewer district (district) powers include the authority to purchase, construct, maintain,
and supply waterworks to furnish water to inhabitants within and outside of the district.
District powers also include the authority to purchase, construct, maintain and operate
systems of sewers and drainage.
Annexation of Territory by Water-Sewer Districts
There are two primary methods by which a water-sewer district may increase its territory
through annexation: (1) the "petition/election method," which requires an initial petition by
the voters, approval of the proposed annexation by the board of the water-sewer district
(board) and the county legislative authority, and culminating in a special election; and (2) the
"petition method," which requires a petition signed by the owners of 60 percent of the
property in the annexation area and the subsequent approval of the proposed annexation by
the board.
"Petition/Election" Method of Annexation
Annexations of territory by a district under the petition/election method allow the annexation
of either: (1) territory that is within the county or counties in which a district is located; or
(2) territory that is adjoining or in close proximity to the district but which is located in
another county. Such annexations must be accomplished in accordance with the following
procedures:
"Petition Method" of Annexation
Annexations of territory by a district under the petition method allow the annexation of an
area that is contiguous to the district. Such annexations must be accomplished in accordance
with the following procedures:
Relocation of Utility Facilities Necessitated by Road Construction or Improvement
State law allows a county or the state to move the location of the facilities of a utility where
reasonably necessary in order to construct, alter or improve a road or highway. As a general
rule the costs associated with moving the utility's facilities are at the expense of the utility.
However, the state may bear the expenses associated with the removal of a utility in certain
instances where federal funding is available for the reimbursement of such expenses.
Selling Electricity Generated as a Byproduct of the Sewage Treatment Process
Sewer facilities operated by water-sewer districts may include facilities that combine sewage
treatment/disposal and the generation of electricity. The resulting electricity is characterized
as being a byproduct of the sewer system and may be used by the water-sewer district or sold
to any entity legally authorized to distribute electricity.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
Annexation by a Water-Sewer District of Territory Within a City
A board may initiate proceedings for the annexation of territory within a city subsequent to
the district acquiring water and/or sewer facilities located within that city. The
commencement of such annexation proceedings requires that the board enter into an
agreement with the city regarding the proposed annexation. Such annexations must be
accomplished in accordance with the following procedural requirements:
Consultation Process for Public Projects Requiring Relocation of Water-Sewer Facilities
In order to coordinate design with respect to public construction projects, counties and cities
must consult with public utilities operating water-sewer systems during the "predesign phase"
of construction projects involving the relocation of water and/or sewer facilities.
Relieving Water-Sewer Districts from Certain Executive/Legislative Reporting
Requirements
A state association of water/wastewater districts is removed from the coverage of a statute
requiring that associations of municipal corporations submit biennial reports to the Governor
and the Legislature containing joint recommendations regarding changes which would affect
the efficiency of such municipal corporations.
Selling Methane Gas Generated as a Byproduct of the Sewage Treatment Process
The statutory powers of water/sewer districts are expanded by allowing sewer facilities to
include facilities that combine sewage treatment/disposal and methane gas generation. The
resulting methane gas is characterized as being a byproduct of the sewer system and may be
used by the water-sewer district or sold to any entity legally authorized to distribute methane
gas.
Authorizing Water-Sewer Districts to Increase the Maximum Term of Leases
Increases the maximum length of leases of unused water-sewer district property from 25 to
50 years.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) This is a good bill that adds desirable provisions to existing water/sewer district
law and makes necessary changes. The new annexation process addressed in the bill will
serve to streamline annexations in many cases and therefore makes sense. The provisions for
collaboration between districts and local governments regarding the relocation of water-sewer
facilities were created after collaboration between all concerned and therefore represent a
consensus approach. Allowing districts to generate and sell byproduct gas is practical
change. The bill should be amended, however, to reference "methane" rather than "natural
gas."
(Opposed) None
Persons Testifying: Joe Daniels, Washington Association of Sewer/Water Districts; and Steve Lindstrom, Sno-King Water District Coalition.