Washington State
House of Representatives
Office of Program Research
BILL
ANALYSIS

Technology, Energy & Communications Committee

HB 1296


This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Brief Description: Regarding state purchasing of information technology projects.

Sponsors: Representatives Hunter and Anderson.

Brief Summary of Bill
  • Requires fiscal notes to identify the fiscal and operational impact on the state information technology portfolio.
  • Requires the Department of Information Services (DIS) to develop a six-year strategic plan for information technology projects.
  • Grants the Information Services Board (ISB) the power to develop statewide requirements for contracts for information technology projects.

Hearing Date: 1/23/07

Staff: Kara Durbin (786-7133).

Background:

The Department of Information Services (DIS) is a cabinet level agency that provides technology-related services to government organizations in Washington. One of the duties of the DIS is to provide staff support to the Information Services Board (ISB).

The ISB is comprised of 15 members who represent the legislative, judicial, and executive branches of government, higher education institutions, and the private sector. The ISB serves a regulatory function for technology. The ISB's policies and actions influence how state agencies proceed with information technology projects.
State Information Technology Reporting:
Under current law, state agencies must develop information technology portfolios. Each agency's portfolio must include: (1) a baseline assessment of the agency's information technology resources and capabilities; (2) projects and resources required to meet the objectives of the agency's identified projects; and (3) where feasible, estimated schedules and funding required to implement the agency's identified projects.

State agencies are directed to provide a progress report to the DIS regarding their information technology portfolios. Per ISB policy, agencies are required to provide this report to the DIS no later than August 31 of each year. In turn, the DIS is to aggregate this information and submit it to the Legislature and the Governor on a biennial basis. The most recent state performance report on information technology was prepared in 2006 to reflect information technology performance during the 2003-2005 biennium.

Fiscal Notes:
The Office of Financial Management (OFM) works with the Legislature on developing fiscal notes, which detail the expected impact of bills and resolutions that may increase or decrease state government revenue or expenditures. Fiscal notes must indicate the impact for the remainder of the current biennium in which the bill will take effect, as well as a cumulative forecast of the fiscal impact for the succeeding four fiscal years.

Summary of Bill:

Fiscal notes must identify the fiscal and operational impact on the state information technology portfolio. The Office of Financial Management (OFM) and the Department of Information Services (DIS) shall consult with each other in developing a process to measure the fiscal and operational impact of a given project on the state information technology portfolio.

DIS must prepare a six-year strategic plan for state information technology projects. At a minimum, the strategic plan must contain the following:

The strategic plan must be updated biennially and submitted to the Governor and the appropriate fiscal committees of the Legislature.

The Information Services Board (ISB) is given the authority to develop statewide requirements for contracts for information technology projects.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Requested on January 19, 2007.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.