Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Technology, Energy & Communications Committee | |
HB 1296
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Regarding state purchasing of information technology projects.
Sponsors: Representatives Hunter and Anderson.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 1/23/07
Staff: Kara Durbin (786-7133).
Background:
The Department of Information Services (DIS) is a cabinet level agency that provides
technology-related services to government organizations in Washington. One of the duties of the
DIS is to provide staff support to the Information Services Board (ISB).
The ISB is comprised of 15 members who represent the legislative, judicial, and executive
branches of government, higher education institutions, and the private sector. The ISB serves a
regulatory function for technology. The ISB's policies and actions influence how state agencies
proceed with information technology projects.
State Information Technology Reporting:
Under current law, state agencies must develop information technology portfolios. Each
agency's portfolio must include: (1) a baseline assessment of the agency's information
technology resources and capabilities; (2) projects and resources required to meet the objectives
of the agency's identified projects; and (3) where feasible, estimated schedules and funding
required to implement the agency's identified projects.
State agencies are directed to provide a progress report to the DIS regarding their information
technology portfolios. Per ISB policy, agencies are required to provide this report to the DIS no
later than August 31 of each year. In turn, the DIS is to aggregate this information and submit it
to the Legislature and the Governor on a biennial basis. The most recent state performance
report on information technology was prepared in 2006 to reflect information technology
performance during the 2003-2005 biennium.
Fiscal Notes:
The Office of Financial Management (OFM) works with the Legislature on developing fiscal
notes, which detail the expected impact of bills and resolutions that may increase or decrease
state government revenue or expenditures. Fiscal notes must indicate the impact for the
remainder of the current biennium in which the bill will take effect, as well as a cumulative
forecast of the fiscal impact for the succeeding four fiscal years.
Summary of Bill:
Fiscal notes must identify the fiscal and operational impact on the state information technology
portfolio. The Office of Financial Management (OFM) and the Department of Information
Services (DIS) shall consult with each other in developing a process to measure the fiscal and
operational impact of a given project on the state information technology portfolio.
DIS must prepare a six-year strategic plan for state information technology projects. At a
minimum, the strategic plan must contain the following:
The strategic plan must be updated biennially and submitted to the Governor and the appropriate
fiscal committees of the Legislature.
The Information Services Board (ISB) is given the authority to develop statewide requirements
for contracts for information technology projects.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 19, 2007.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.