HOUSE BILL REPORT
ESHB 1637
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House:
March 12, 2007
Title: An act relating to creating the revised uniform anatomical gift act.
Brief Description: Creating the revised uniform anatomical gift act.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Health Care & Wellness (originally sponsored by Representatives Hinkle, Cody, B. Sullivan, Moeller, Campbell, Williams, Green, Lovick, Upthegrove, Seaquist, Goodman, Simpson, Morrell, Linville, Ormsby and Rolfes).
Brief History:
Health Care & Wellness: 2/8/07, 2/27/07 [DPS].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 3/12/07, 98-0.
Brief Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH CARE & WELLNESS
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 13 members: Representatives Cody, Chair; Morrell, Vice Chair; Hinkle, Ranking Minority Member; Alexander, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Barlow, Campbell, Condotta, Curtis, Green, Moeller, Pedersen, Schual-Berke and Seaquist.
Staff: Chris Cordes (786-7103).
Background:
Laws Addressing Organ Transplants
In 1968, the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws adopted the
Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA) to address, in part, the shortage of organs for
transplants. This version of the UAGA was adopted by all the states. When the UAGA was
revised in 1987 (UAGA of 1987), 26 jurisdictions adopted it, including Washington in 1993.
Since the adoption of the UAGA, the U.S. Congress established the Organ Procurement and
Transplantation Network (Network) under the National Organ Transplant Act of 1984. The
procurement organizations in the service area in which a donor lives are responsible for
recovering the donated parts, to be allocated as determined by the Network.
The Washington UAGA of 1987
Donors. The UAGA of 1987 specifies the persons who are permitted to make anatomical
gifts (persons over 18, or over 16 with a parent's signature) or refuse to make gifts, and the
methods by which such gifts or refusals are made, including through signed documents and
imprinted driver's licenses. It also specifies the methods by which revocations of gifts or
refusals may be made, including a witnessed oral statement or communication during a
terminal illness.
Certain persons are allowed, in order of priority, to make anatomical gifts on behalf of a
decedent, including guardians, certain relatives, and persons with a health care power of
attorney, unless the decedent has made an unrevoked refusal to make that gift.
Donees. Anatomical gifts may be made to (1) individuals for transplantation or therapy, (2)
hospitals, physicians, or procurement organizations for transplantation, therapy, education,
research, or the advancement of science, or (3) accredited colleges and universities for
education, research, or the advancement of science. Hospitals are allowed to accept
donations that are rejected by a donee.
Identifying Donors. Hospitals must have procedures for identifying potential anatomical
parts donors, including asking the next of kin if the deceased was a donor and discussing
donation options with them. Hospitals and coroners or medical examiners must also make
reasonable searches of patients or persons within their jurisdiction, respectively, for gift
donor documentation.
Organ and Tissue Donor Registry. In 2003, the Organ and Tissue Donor Registry was
established in Washington. The Department of Licensing is required to transfer organ donor
information from driver's licenses to the registry.
Violations. It is a Class C felony to knowingly purchase or sell, for valuable consideration, a
part for transplantation or therapy, if the removal of the part is intended to occur after death.
Immunity. There is both civil and criminal immunity for persons who act in accordance with
the UAGA of 1987, or attempt to do so in good faith.
Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill:
The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act of 1987 is repealed, and the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act
of 2006 is adopted, with some revisions.
Anatomical Gift Donors
The list of persons who may be donors of anatomical gifts is expanded to include:
Gifts may be evidenced by:
For signatures, electronic symbols may be used in addition to written signatures.
An anatomical gift document is valid if executed according to these provisions or another
state's or country's law where executed or where the person is domiciled, had a place of
residence, or was a national at the time of execution of the document.
There is a presumption that an anatomical gift document is valid, unless the person knows
that it was not validly executed or was revoked.
In the absence of express contrary indication of the donor, a person other than the donor is
prohibited from making, amending, or revoking an anatomical gift that the donor made.
Gift Revocation
An anatomical gift may be revoked or amended by:
A donor's revocation of an anatomical gift is not a refusal to be a donor and does not bar
another authorized person from making an anatomical gift of the body or part.
Refusal to be an Anatomical Gift Donor
In the absence of express contrary indications, an individual's unrevoked refusal to make a
gift bars all other persons from making a gift of the individual's body or part.
Anatomical Gift Donations on Behalf of a Decedent
The classes of specified persons who can make gifts of a decedent's body or parts is expanded
to include these additional persons:
The order of priority is changed to make guardians the last priority, except for persons with
legal authority to dispose of the body.
A gift may be made by specified persons on behalf of a decedent after another such gift has
been revoked. Any member of a class may make a gift, unless objections from other
members of the class are known, and then the majority of persons in the class may make the
gift. Revocation may be made a person in a higher class of priority unless a majority of
persons in the higher class agree to the gift, but the revocation is effective only if the entity or
person removing the body part knows before invasive procedures have begun.
Parents of an unemancipated minor who dies may revoke or amend an anatomical gift or a
gift refusal.
Donees of Anatomical Gifts
Donees of anatomical gifts may be:
If a body part cannot be used by the donee or a donee is not named, there are provisions to
specify to whom the body part passes. Priority is given to transplantation or therapy, over
education or research, in certain situations.
Organ Procurement Organizations
A procurement organization, when a hospital refers an individual at or near death, must make
a reasonable search of Department of Licensing records or any donor registry to ascertain
whether the person has made an anatomical gift. The organization must be given reasonable
access to records.
Measures necessary to ensure medical suitability of the gift during the procurement
organization's examination for suitability may not be withdrawn, unless the individual
expressed a contrary intent or an advance health directive expressly provides to the contrary.
The procurement organization must:
Hospital and Emergency Personnel Procedures
Law enforcement officers, emergency personnel, and hospitals, if no other information is
available, must make a reasonable search of the individual for a document of gift or refusal of
gift if someone has died or is near death. The document or refusal must be sent to the
hospital.
Illegal Activities
In addition to existing penalities, it is a Class C felony to intentionally falsify, forge, or
obliterate a document of gift or refusal of gift for financial gain.
Immunity for Good Faith Actions
Additional immunity in civil or criminal proceedings is granted. A person may rely on the
representations of the individuals specified to make gifts on behalf of the deceased as to their
relationship with the deceased, unless the person knows that the representation is untrue.
Application Provisions
These provisions apply to all anatomical gifts, refusals to make gifts, or revocations of gifts,
whenever made. These provisions continue to be subject to the laws governing the
jurisdiction of the coroner or medical examiner.
With respect to electronic signatures and anatomical gifts, these provisions supercede certain
requirements of the federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act that
federal law permits to be superceded.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) The new uniform act resolves many issues that have been concerns under current
law. The rights of an individual to make anatomical gifts, or to refuse to, is strengthened.
Transplantation is given priority over research, unless the donor says otherwise. The bill
clarifies who can give consent to a gift. It keeps the current Washington donor registry. The
provisions relating to medical examiners are new because there is not a uniform process for
coordinating with post mortem examinations. There is a need to update the law to comply
with current practices. The uniform law commissioners are a nonpartisan group of lawyers
and judges from all the states whose job is to bring clarity and stability to the uniform laws.
The process to update the Anatomical Gift Act was very inclusive. Uniformity across the
states is very important, especially in an issue like anatomical gifts, where timeliness is of
great concern. The state should resist making changes that are simply the preferences of
various groups. The bill will save lives if it passes.
(With concerns) Coroners just became aware of this bill. It raises some serious concerns.
There should be a collaborative process to resolve these concerns. Washington has a very
effective death investigation system, but we cannot expect the rapid response this bill might
require, especially in rural counties. The bill may impose an unreasonable burden on
coroners and medical examiners to attend to issues relating to transplants. Many counties do
not have the staff, or they will have geographical barriers to complying. The current law
works to balance various statutory requirements.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Jackie Der, University of Washington; Dennis Cooper,
Uniform Law Commissioners of Washington; and Monica Johnson-Tomanka, Life Center
Northwest.
(With concerns) Debbie Wilke, Washington Association of County Officials.