HOUSE BILL REPORT
SHB 2014
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed Legislature
Title: An act relating to the regulation of conversion condominiums.
Brief Description: Addressing the regulation of conversion condominiums.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Housing (originally sponsored by Representatives Chase, Santos, Kenney, Hasegawa, Miloscia, Simpson and Ormsby).
Brief History:
Housing: 2/12/07, 2/26/07 [DPS].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 1/18/08, 94-3.
Senate Amended.
Passed Senate: 3/6/08, 36-11.
House Concurred.
Passed House: 3/8/08, 64-29.
Passed Legislature.
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HOUSING
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Miloscia, Chair; Springer, Vice Chair; Dunn, Ranking Minority Member; Kelley, McCune, Ormsby and Schindler.
Staff: Robyn Dupuis (786-7166).
Background:
Notice of Condominium Conversion
When apartments are converted into condominiums, the condominium developer must give
each existing apartment tenant notice of the conversion 90 days before they are required to
vacate. No tenant may be required to vacate on less than 90 days notice except for tenant
violations of the Landlord-Tenant Act.
City or County Requirements - Relocation Assistance
A city or county may establish a variety of requirements in regards to condominium
conversions including that relocation assistance be paid to tenants who elect not to purchase a
unit. Relocation assistance may not exceed $500 per unit.
Local Ordinances and Building Codes - Restrictions
Local regulations may not prohibit the condominium form of ownership nor impose
requirements on condominiums which it would not impose on a similar development.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
Notice of Condominium Conversion
A condominium declarant must give existing apartment tenants 120 days notice of the
conversion of the apartment into a condominium and may not require that the tenant vacate
the apartment before that 120-day period has expired. The notice must include information
about any city or county relocation assistance program. Local jurisdictions may require that
declarants also submit a copy of the notice to the appropriate city or county department or
agency.
City or County Requirements - Relocation Assistance and Construction
Commencement
A city or county may require that:
(1) The declarant pay relocation assistance of an amount to be determined by the city or county, to tenants who:
Relocation assistance may not exceed three months of an eligible tenant's rent except in the
case of eligible elderly or special needs tenants who may receive the greater of:
(a) three months of the tenant's or subtenant's rent; or
(b) actual costs of relocation which may include costs associated with securing
replacement housing, up to a maximum of $1,500 in excess of the sum of three
months of the tenant's or subtenant's rent.
(2) Interior construction for the purpose of converting buildings into condominiums may not commence during the 120-day notice period unless:
Regardless of the circumstance, construction must not violate tenant's right of quiet
enjoyment during the 120-day notice period.
The act does not apply to any conversion condominiums for which a legal notice of
conversion has been delivered to tenants before the effective date of the act.
Cities and counties planning under the Growth Management Act (GMA) are required to
report annually to the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development
(DCTED) on condominium conversions occurring within their jurisdictions. Cities and
counties may require declarants to provide required information to the appropriate
department. Information to be reported must include:
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect on August 1, 2008.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support of original bill) Housing is a basic need and there are a large number of
much-needed rental units being converted into condominiums resulting in a loss of valuable
rental housing. Displaced renters are having difficulties finding affordable housing given the
low vacancy rates. Cities need the authority to limit conversions so that people are not forced
out on the streets.
(In support of original bill with suggestions) The notification period should be longer. The
Manufactured/Mobile Home Landlord-Tenant Act provides for a notification period of 12
months if a park is closing. There should also be a disclosure in every rental agreement
highlighting the possibility that the building could be converted into a condominium
development. Tenants should be able to terminate their rental agreements after receiving
notification of a condominium conversion. The amount of relocation assistance should be
based on some sort of formula using the amount of rent and length of tenancy so this doesn't
become a backhanded way for local jurisdictions to impose an effectual moratorium on
condominium conversions. The construction wait period should be amended to enable
developers to allow tenants to stay in a unit if they wish which could be accomplished by
requiring a wait period of 120 days or 12 hours before the last tenant vacates, whichever is
earlier.
(Opposed to original bill) There is a need to protect and assist some vulnerable people whose
apartments are being converted into condominiums but the majority of renters are able to find
new units. The net loss of rental housing is a temporary phenomena, and the rental market
will catch up because there is a need for new rental units. Increasing relocation assistance is
a good idea however it shouldn't be unlimited. There should be a new monetary cap or
perhaps a formula based on three months' rent. Extending the notification time period is also
a good idea, but making a developer wait 120 days, or possibly much longer than that,
depending upon existing tenant leases, to begin construction is totally unfeasible. Not only is
this a financial hardship on the condominium declarant, but most developers are willing to
work with tenants if tenants want (or need) to remain in their units as long as possible during
the conversion process. With this new language, declarants would be required to vacate the
entire property which could consist of several buildings, even if conversion-related
construction is just occurring in one limited area such as a parking lot. There are also
technical issues that should be addressed, for example, a declarant is required to give every
existing tenant a public offering statement which includes disclosures about the condition of
the building, however, conditions cannot be evaluated without a declarant having the ability
to conduct some exploratory construction activity. There also needs to be some sort of limit
on a local jurisdiction's ability to restrict the number of condominium conversions each year
so that this restriction doesn't become a complete moratorium. Conversion condominiums
are often the best and only option for a first time home buyer and if such affordable
homeownership opportunities are not available, renters will continue to rent, thus tying up
existing rental stock. Language in this bill will diminish a developer's interest in
condominium conversion projects. Local governments should develop assistance programs
to encourage and help current apartment tenants become new condominium homeowners.
Persons Testifying: (In support of original bill) Representative Chase, prime sponsor; Brian
Hocksford, for Seattle City Councilman Tom Rasmussen; John Fox, Seattle Displacement
Coalition; Randi Hansen; Bette Reed, Washington State Coalition of Retired Americans;
Sinan Demiral, Seattle/King County Coalition for the Homeless; Bill Kirlen-Hackett, Inter-Faith Task Force on Homelessness; and Gary Provenzano, Columbia Legal Services.
(In support of original bill with suggestions) Ezra Eickmeyer, Pioneer Property Group; Bob
Mitchell, Washington Realtors; and Brad Beddall.
(Opposed to original bill) Joe McCarthy, Konlon Taylor McCarthy; Alison Birmingham,
Murray Franklin Companies; Chaun Mackey, MCM Real Estate; Doug Nelson, Remax
Unlimited; Jamie Goodwin, Foster Pepper Law Firm; Tory Laughlin Taylor, A. F. Evans
Development; John Woodring, Rental Housing Association of Puget Sound; Dave Kirzinger
and Jasmin Avdic, Mosaic Homes; Jack Hawes, Equity Residential; and Warren Ballard.