HOUSE BILL REPORT
ESHB 2171
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed Legislature
Title: An act relating to crane safety.
Brief Description: Regarding crane safety.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Commerce & Labor (originally sponsored by Representatives Eddy, Conway, Campbell, Hankins, Sells, Ormsby, Moeller, Ericks, Roberts, Darneille, Hunt, Blake, Kessler, Rolfes, Flannigan, O'Brien, Hurst, Buri, Williams, Grant, Chandler, Hasegawa, Simpson, Santos, Barlow, Morrell, Fromhold, Priest, Lantz, Strow, B. Sullivan, Cody, Hinkle, Eickmeyer, Haigh, Anderson, Appleton, Kenney, Chase, McCoy, Walsh, Haler, Kelley, Springer, Newhouse, Dunshee, Linville, McIntire, Lovick, Sump, Kirby, Schual-Berke, Kagi, Quall, Ahern, Pettigrew, VanDeWege, Condotta, Green, Seaquist, Dickerson, P. Sullivan and Sommers).
Brief History:
Commerce & Labor: 2/20/07, 2/23/07 [DPS].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 3/7/07, 97-0.
Passed Senate: 3/31/07, 39-8.
Passed Legislature.
Brief Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE & LABOR
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 5 members: Representatives Conway, Chair; Wood, Vice Chair; Green, Moeller and Williams.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 2 members: Representatives Condotta, Ranking Minority Member and Chandler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member.
Staff: Sarah Beznoska (786-7109).
Background:
Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act
Generally, workplace safety is governed by the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act
(OSHA). The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration within the federal
Department of Labor administers the OSHA. However, Washington is a "state plan state"
under the federal OSHA. As a state plan state, Washington is authorized to assume
responsibility for occupational safety and health in the state.
The Department of Labor and Industries (Department) administers and enforces the
Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (WISHA). The WISHA directs the Department
to adopt rules governing safety and health standards for workplaces covered by the WISHA.
To maintain its status as a state plan state, Washington's safety and health standards must be
at least as effective as standards adopted or recognized under the OSHA.
State Crane Regulations
Under the WISHA, the Department has adopted rules related to safety standards in
construction work. These rules include rules related to cranes. Under Department rule, an
employer is required to comply with manufacturer's specifications and limitations applicable
to the operation of any and all cranes and derricks. If manufacturer's specifications are not
available, limitations assigned to the equipment must be based on determinations of a
qualified engineer.
In addition, an employer is required to designate a competent person to inspect all machinery
and equipment prior to each use, and periodically during use to make sure it is in safe
operating condition. Any deficiencies must be repaired, or defective parts replaced, before
continued use. A thorough, annual inspection by a competent person, or by a government or
private agency recognized by the Department is also required. The employer must maintain a
permanent record of the dates and results of all inspections.
"Competent person" is defined in rule as one who is capable of identifying existing and
predictable hazards in the surroundings or working conditions which are unsanitary,
hazardous, or dangerous to employees, and who has authorization to take prompt corrective
action to eliminate them.
Under the WISHA, the Department also has created a specific program for cranes used in the
maritime industry. Under this program, the Department recognizes certain crane certifiers as
accredited crane certifiers. Accredited crane certifiers are authorized to conduct certain tests,
inspections, and examinations, and to issue corresponding certificates for cranes used in the
maritime industry.
Federal Activity
Negotiated rule-making is a process authorized under the federal Negotiated Rulemaking Act.
Under the federal law, a federal agency is authorized to establish a negotiated rule-making
committee when the agency determines that a negotiated rule-making committee can
adequately represent the interests that will be significantly affected by a proposed rule and
that it is feasible and appropriate in the particular rule-making. The federal agency chooses
participants on the committee and committee meetings are announced and open to the public.
Decisions by a negotiated rule-making committee are made by consensus, which is defined as
unanimous concurrence among the interests represented on a negotiated rulemaking
committee, unless the committee:
To adopt rules proposed by a negotiated rule-making committee, a federal agency must
engage in the official rulemaking process, including notice of proposed rule-making,
opportunity for public comment, and promulgation of a final rule.
In June 2003, the federal Department of Labor established a "Crane and Derrick Negotiated
Rulemaking Committee" to participate in a negotiated rule-making process and develop a
proposal to use as the basis for a federal rule-making on new safety standards for cranes and
derricks.
In 2004, the federal Department of Labor announced that the Crane and Derrick Negotiated
Rulemaking Committee had reached a consensus on a proposal for new crane rules. The
consensus document contains a variety of general safety standards related to cranes, including
crane operator requirements. The consensus document does not address crane certification.
Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill:
The Department of Labor and Industries (Department) is required to establish a crane
certification program and qualified crane operator requirements.
Crane Certification
The Department must establish, by rule, a crane certification program for cranes used in
construction. In establishing rules, the Department must consult nationally recognized crane
standards. Minimum requirements for the crane certification program are created. The crane
certification program must include:
Any crane operated in the state must have a valid temporary or final certificate of operation
issued by the certified crane inspector or Department posted in the operator's cab or station.
Certificates of operation issued by the Department under the crane certification program are
valid for one year from the effective date of the temporary operating certificate issued by the
certified crane inspector.
The crane certification program does not apply to maritime cranes regulated by the
Department.
Crane Operators
Generally, an employer or contractor must not allow a crane operator to operate a crane
unless the crane operator is a qualified crane operator, as established by the Department in
rule. Procedures are created, however, for allowing an operator who is not a qualified crane
operator to operate with supervision.
The qualified crane operator standards established by the Department in rule must include the
following minimum requirements:
A person who does not meet qualified crane operator requirements may operate a crane when:
The supervising crane operator must:
The Department may recognize certification from another state or territory of the United
States as equivalent to qualified crane operator requirements if the Department determines
that the other jurisdiction's credentialing standards are substantially similar to the
Department's qualified crane operator requirements.
Definition of Crane and Application of Requirements
"Crane" is generally defined as power-operated equipment used in construction that can hoist,
lower, and horizontally move a suspended load. "Crane" includes, but is not limited to:
articulating cranes, such as knuckle-boom cranes; crawler cranes; floating cranes; cranes on
barges; locomotive cranes; mobile cranes, such as wheel-mounted, rough-terrain, all-terrain,
commercial truck mounted, and boom truck cranes; multipurpose machines when configured
to hoist and lower and horizontally move a suspended load by means of a winch or hook;
industrial cranes, such as carry-deck cranes; dedicated pile drivers; service/mechanic trucks
with a hoisting device; a crane on a monorail; tower cranes, such as fixed job, hammerhead
boom, luffing boom, and self-erecting; pedestal cranes; portal cranes; overhead and gantry
cranes; straddle cranes; side-boom tractors; derricks; and variations of such equipment.
A specific list of exemptions is created. The crane certification requirements and the crane
operator requirements do not apply to:
Construction means all or any part of excavation, construction, erection, alteration, repair, demolition, and dismantling of buildings and other structures and all related operations; the excavation, construction, alteration, and repair of sewers, trenches, caissons, conduits, pipelines, roads, and all related operations; the moving of buildings and other structures, or any other related construction, alteration, repair, or removal work. Construction does not include manufacturing facilities or powerhouses.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: New fiscal note requested on February 26, 2007.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect on January 1, 2010.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) This bill is related to the crane collapse that occurred last fall. When the crane
collapsed, it was surprising to learn that the state had no involvement in inspecting cranes. In
the aftermath of the event, structural problems were found and corrected in other cranes. Had
the accident not happened, those structural problems would not have been found.
When the crane collapsed in the fall, there were many losses, including loss of public
confidence and, most significantly, loss of a resident. There is no way to provide 100 percent
certainty that there will never be another accident, but this bill goes a long way towards
preventing these types of accidents.
There are many industries regulated in the state and some may be over-regulated. This is not
one of those areas. Cranes are hundreds of tons of equipment in the air under the control of a
single human being. If heavy equipment is appropriately put together, inspected, maintained,
and used, it is safe. This is an area that needs regulation.
There has been a lot of work on this bill. It is critical to deal with this issue this year.
Construction is growing and it is important for public health, safety, and welfare to deal with
this issue now. A number of people have worked on this bill.
This bill does not prohibit anyone from operating a crane. It just requires a person to be
certified before operating the crane and it requires the crane to be inspected. Experience is
also required for operators. There are concerns about the definition of construction, and that
issue is being worked on.
This bill, with the substitute, conforms to federal consensus documents. The substitute
provides the appropriate guidance to the Department on what is needed in the rule-making.
The bill allows the Department to accomplish the Department's mandates under the
Occupational Safety and Health Act. The Department supports making it clear that the bill
does not apply to manufacturing.
There were two areas of concern that were worked out. First, the scope of the bill. The scope
was copied directly from the Crane and Derrick Negotiated Rule-making Committee federal
consensus document and that is coming down the pike and will be here anyway. It makes
sense to follow what is coming at the federal level. The second area of concern was crane
certification, which goes beyond the consensus document. However, crane certification is
linked to periodic inspections which are already required under rules developed by the
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the American Society of Mechanical
Engineers. The only different element under the bill is that, after the inspection is done, there
is certification. This would place some sort of certificate on the crane so that the operator
and everyone else can see that it has been inspected.
The bill should clarify who certifying entities are, such as the National Commission for
Certifying Agencies. Standards developed by ANSI could be referenced as well.
(In support with amendments) There is support for the concept of this legislation, but the bill
itself has shortcomings. There are a number of suggested changes to the bill that would
clarify agreements and would more specifically tie rule-making and policy decisions to
national documents.
One suggested change deals with the scope of coverage. The bill does not define
construction. Rather than trying to define what construction is, a specific exemption could be
created to more clearly state what is covered and what is not covered. There is also a
question about how much regulation should be done over mobile cranes or boom trucks. A
suggested change is to clarify in the bill that any boom truck with a rotating operator platform
would be covered, but other boom trucks, with a fixed or stationary platform, would not.
Other states take a different approach by limiting coverage by weight of the crane. For
example, California uses three tons.
Other changes should specifically allow reciprocity for crane inspectors and operators.
Alternative load testing procedures are also needed for large cranes. A requirement should be
added for a physical examination for crane operators.
The fiscal note apportions 93 percent of the cost of this program to employers while the
benefits are more evenly distributed. Cost should be more evenly distributed.
(With concerns) Some language in the bill needs to be changed so that it does not have
detrimental effect on utilities. My group is a maintenance group of about 100 people with
about 11 hydraulic cranes and boom trucks. The bill would deal with this equipment. The
requirement for up to 2,000 hours of experience would be prohibitive. In addition, we
already have an excellent inspection program. We do not operate the same way as
construction. Our workforce is qualified to operate, inspect, and take care of our cranes and
equipment. Electric utilities should be excluded from this bill or some of the language
should be clarified as to how it applies to electric utilities.
(Opposed) There are changes to the bill that are needed. Practices and policies that promote
safety in the workplace are supportable and the safety of cranes in construction is
supportable. However, the term construction is not defined and this raises concerns for
businesses that engage in manufacturing. Manufacturing should be exempt.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Eddy, prime sponsor; Steve Cant,
Department of Labor and Industries; Thom Sicklesteel, Sicklesteel Cranes, Inc.; Randy
Loomans, International Union of Operating Engineers Local 302; Mike Brennan, City of
Bellevue; and Danny Thiemens, National Commission for the Certification of Crane
Operators.
(In support with amendments) Rick Slunaker, Associated General Contractors.
(With concerns) Tom Treat, Chelan County Public Utility District.
(Opposed) Grant Nelson, Association of Washington Business.