HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 2203
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House:
January 28, 2008
Title: An act relating to applying RCW 41.56.430 through 41.56.490 to employees working under a site certificate issued under chapter 80.50 RCW.
Brief Description: Applying RCW 41.56.430 through 41.56.490 to employees working under a site certificate issued under chapter 80.50 RCW.
Sponsors: By Representatives Blake, Conway, Kenney, Hunt, Green and Moeller.
Brief History:
Commerce & Labor: 2/22/07, 2/26/07 [DP].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 1/28/08, 68-24.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE & LABOR
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 5 members: Representatives Conway, Chair; Wood, Vice Chair; Green, Moeller and Williams.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 2 members: Representatives Condotta, Ranking Minority Member and Chandler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member.
Staff: Jill Reinmuth (786-7134).
Background:
Employees of cities, counties, and other political subdivisions of the state bargain their wages
and working conditions under the Public Employees' Collective Bargaining Act (PECBA)
administered by the Public Employment Relations Commission (Commission). For
uniformed personnel, the PECBA recognizes the public policy against strikes as a means of
settling labor disputes. To resolve impasses over contract negotiations involving these
uniformed personnel, the PECBA requires binding arbitration.
The employees who are listed as uniformed personnel include, among others: firefighters in
all cities and counties and law enforcement officers in larger cities and counties, correctional
security personnel employed in larger county jails, general authority peace officers and
firefighters employed by certain port districts, security forces at a nuclear power plant, and
publicly employed advanced life support technicians. Other public employees covered by
interest arbitration include state patrol officers and certain transit employees under the
PECBA and ferry workers under the Marine Employees' Public Employment Relations Act.
For all personnel who are subject to binding interest arbitration under the PECBA, an interest
arbitration panel must consider:
Summary of Bill:
The interest arbitration provisions of the Public Employees' Collective Bargaining Act
(PECBA) apply to operating and maintenance employees who are employed at a commercial
nuclear power plant by a joint operating agency.
For these operating and maintenance employees, an interest arbitration panel must consider:
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) These workers operate under a "no strike" clause. When the last and final offer
is not acceptable, they should be able to go to arbitration.
In 1995, negotiations lasted 22 months and failed. The company was ready to implement a
contract. The workers had no right to strike and no right to binding arbitration. The parties
met with a federal mediator, but that process was non-binding.
We now have a letter of agreement that provides for binding arbitration in the event of failed
negotiations. This bill would codify the letter of agreement. It would allow us to go to a
third party in the event that future negotiations failed.
When the PECBA was originally enacted, a committee unanimously supported binding
arbitration as a means of resolving an impasse involving law enforcement officers and fire
fighters. If strikes and lockouts did not make sense, binding arbitration was the best
alternative. Strikes and lockouts do not make sense for these nuclear workers. Binding
arbitration is needed.
(Opposed) In 1995, the plant was in trouble in terms of viability. We got through that time.
We now have a letter of agreement that provides for binding arbitration in the event of failed
negotiations. This bill is a solution looking for a problem.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Blake, prime sponsor; and Bob Guenther,
Spencer Clark, and Dick King, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.
(Opposed) Dale Atkinson, Energy Northwest.