HOUSE BILL REPORT
ESHB 2268
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House:
March 9, 2007
Title: An act relating to the possession of dangerous weapons on school facilities.
Brief Description: Revising provisions relating to possession of dangerous weapons on school facilities.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Judiciary (originally sponsored by Representatives Lantz, Lovick, Strow, Kagi, Eddy, Ericks, Green, B. Sullivan, McCoy, Moeller, Schual-Berke, Kenney, Hunt, Kelley and Ormsby).
Brief History:
Judiciary: 2/20/07, 2/27/07 [DPS].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 3/9/07, 91-6.
Brief Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 11 members: Representatives Lantz, Chair; Goodman, Vice Chair; Rodne, Ranking Minority Member; Warnick, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Ahern, Flannigan, Kirby, Moeller, Pedersen, Ross and Williams.
Staff: Jasmine Vasavada (786-5793) and Bill Perry (786-7123).
Background:
With certain exceptions, it is a gross misdemeanor to possess a dangerous weapon on school
property. School property includes the school premises, transportation systems, and areas of
any facility while being used exclusively by a public or private school. In the 2005-06 school
year, public schools reported 3,387 violations of the prohibition against possession of a
dangerous weapon at school facilities.
The following dangerous weapons are prohibited: (a) firearms; (b);"nunchu-ka sticks"; (c)
"throwing stars"; (d) air guns; and (e) "dangerous weapons" listed under another statute as
slung shots, sand clubs, metal knuckles, devices for suppressing the noise of a firearm, and
certain knives, such as switchblades.
Exceptions from the ban on possession of dangerous weapons are made for law enforcement,
security or military personnel, persons involved in firearms safety events or competitions,
persons with concealed pistol licenses who are picking up or dropping off students, and
nonstudents 18 years or older in lawful possession of an unloaded firearm under certain
circumstances.
Offenders face the following sanctions for possession of a firearm:
Mental Health Evaluation:
Minors or adults may be referred for voluntary or involuntary treatment of a mental disorder,
including involuntary commitment if the individual poses a likelihood of serious harm or is
gravely disabled. The DMHP also may refer the person to the county-designated chemical
dependency specialist for evaluation. The results of the evaluation are sent to the court, and
the court considers those results in making any determination about the person.
Multi-Disciplinary Threat Committees:
Some Washington school districts have developed local multi-disciplinary threat committees
to evaluate and respond to threats of violence in schools. These include Seattle public
schools, a county-wide program in Skagit County, and the Sunnyside School District in
Eastern Washington. Multi-disciplinary threat assessment committees may comprise school
staff, trained mental health professionals, and representatives from local law enforcement
agencies. The formation of such teams to help advise school officials on the assessment of
threats, evaluation of the person posing the threat, and appropriate level of response is a best
practice recommended by the United States Department of Education, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, and the United States Secret Service.
Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill:
The list of dangerous weapons whose possession is banned on school facilities is revised to
more closely conform to weapons already defined as dangerous under other sections of the
Revised Code of Washington. Weapons newly listed in this section whose possession on
school grounds is a gross misdemeanor include stun guns, live ammunition and ammunition
magazines, and blackjacks.
A separate category is created for weapons whose possession is criminalized only if the
person possessing the weapon actually uses, attempts to use, threatens to use, or intends to
use the object to cause death or substantial bodily harm. This category includes a broad range
of objects, including certain knives, clubs, and some other devices such as a screwdriver
whose possession is not in itself a crime. Development of a model policy is recommended to
help school staff and threat assessment committees develop procedures to document evidence
of a person's use of or intent to use a weapon on school grounds in violation of this section.
The criminal penalty for possession of a firearm is raised from a gross misdemeanor to a class
C felony (subject to a presumptive sentence of up to 12 months incarceration for adults and
up to 30 days detention for juveniles for a first offense). However, a student otherwise
lawfully possessing a firearm secured in a locked vehicle is guilty of a gross misdemeanor,
not a felony, if the student possessed the firearm with no intent to cause harm or alarm. In
addition, a new exemption from the weapons prohibition is created for any person legally in
possession of a weapon for the purpose of an authorized activity or class.
Current school disciplinary practice is clarified. Possession on school grounds of a weapon,
other than a firearm, may constitute grounds for expulsion, but expulsion is not required.
Mandatory procedures following an arrest for a firearms violation are changed:
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 27, 2007.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) This bill presents huge opportunities to ensure that students are safe from objects
that could be used as weapons. It addresses situations that are increasingly common where an
object such as a sharpened screwdriver is brought onto school grounds to be used as a
weapon.
In rural Eastern Washington, we have seen an increase in acts of violence on school
campuses and a growing amount of gang activity. This bill makes a statement that we will
not tolerate violence on our campuses. In a recent case, an intervention took place with a
student who had a loaded gun on campus for two days. This student will not serve much jail
time, sending a message that it is not a serious situation. Schools can expel students, but that
simply sends them back out onto the street to wage war with their cohorts. We need laws
with teeth to put students away who create violence on our campuses.
Incidents involving children and firearms on school grounds need to be more closely
scrutinized. Through the process of referral to threat assessment teams, authorities are
encouraged to ask more of a question about whether a particular child is a risk, and to
consider the child in the entire context of his or her life. This process can help identify risk
factors in children and have a tremendous impact in reconnecting disenfranchised kids. The
current mental health assessment process is not very effective. The multidisciplinary threat
assessment team approach can bring together information from police and schools and allows
consideration of a person's living situation and other information that a mental health
professional does not have. Through this process a student can be managed, not just
assessed. The team follows the student in a case management approach.
(With concerns) Mandatory arrest for eight year olds gives us concern because they are
presumed to be incapable of committing a crime. The list of prohibited weapons includes
some objects such as a nail file that are not necessarily weapons but could be used as
weapons, and in those cases we should add language that exists in some provisions limiting
criminal penalties to situations where it has been shown that the object was used or intended
to be used as a weapon. Ammunition should not be listed as a prohibited weapon.
Bills like this tend to focus on the bad guys and fail to take into account innocent people who
fall afoul of the laws, such as a case in Enumclaw a couple years ago in which a student
returned from hunting and did not remove empty shotgun shells from his pickup truck, only
to face expulsion under the school's zero tolerance policy. This may be an issue primarily
east of the Cascades. A felony conviction for a student who forgets a firearm locked in his
truck with no intent to cause any harm would lead to a lifetime loss of firearms rights. There
should be prosecutorial discretion rather than automatic felony prosecution.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Lantz, prime sponsor; Craig Apperson,
Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction; Joe Pope, Association of Washington
School Principals; Martin Speckmaier, Comprehensive School Safety, LLC; John Hughes,
Sunnyside School District; and Charles Lind.
(With concerns) Don Pierce, Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs; and Joe
Waldron, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms.