HOUSE BILL REPORT
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Title: An act relating to accountability, efficiency, and oversight of state facility planning and management.
Brief Description: Requiring oversight of state agency housing decisions.
Sponsors: Representatives Dunshee, Jarrett, Ormsby, Hunter and Kenney.
Capital Budget: 3/1/07, 3/2/07 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON CAPITAL BUDGET
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 22 members: Representatives Fromhold, Chair; Ormsby, Vice Chair; Schual-Berke, Vice Chair; McDonald, Ranking Minority Member; Newhouse, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Blake, Chase, Dunshee, Eickmeyer, Flannigan, Goodman, Hankins, Hasegawa, Kelley, McCune, Orcutt, Pearson, Pedersen, Sells, Skinner, Strow and Upthegrove.
Staff: Nona Snell (786-7153).
The Department of General Administration's Statutory Authority for Leasing Facilities
The Department of General Administration (GA) has the statutory authority to acquire, lease, purchase, and dispose of real estate on behalf of all state agencies except for four-year universities, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Department of Natural Resources, the State Parks and Recreation Commission, and the Liquor Control Board. This authority includes determining the location, size, and design of real estate and improvements. The Director of GA is required to adopt standards for facilities that must be approved by the Office of Financial Management (OFM). The Director of GA may grant exceptions to the standards and must report to the OFM annually on the exemptions granted.
The GA may delegate their statutory authority for acquiring space for agencies. The GA also charges a fee for services provided for in statute. The GA may not enter into leases longer than 20 years.
The State Budgeting, Accounting, and Reporting System (RCW 43.88) mandates long-range capital budget planning. State agencies and institutions must submit a 10-year plan of proposed capital spending that is designed to identify future needs and propose capital projects addressing those needs. The OFM's capital budget instructions require submittal of the plan.
The Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee (JLARC), in response to a 1996 audit on the cost differences between leased and state owned offices, developed an economic model to quantify and compare all costs involved with state facilities. The model is a tool used to predict the long-term cost differences between state ownership (construction) and leasing of buildings. It includes sensitivity analysis that demonstrates how the results might change given the uncertainty of some assumptions (e.g. lease rate escalation and building occupancy rates). In January 2007, the JLARC completed an update of the model assumptions and built in new capabilities.
The OFM's capital budget instructions require the use of the lease versus ownership decision model for projects using alternative financing (e.g. Certificates of Participation and 63-20 financing). Statute authorizes the GA to enter into long-term leases greater than 10 years if an analysis shows that the life-cycle cost of leasing the facility is less than the life-cycle cost of purchasing or constructing a facility in lieu of leasing the facility. Leases greater than 10 years in duration require approval from the Director of OFM. Statute also requires the GA to conduct an evaluation of facility design and budget using life-cycle cost analysis, value engineering, and other techniques to maximize the long-term effectiveness and efficiency of the facility prior to construction of new or improvement of existing facilities under its management.
The JLARC's 2007 report to the Legislature includes three recommendations: (1) the OFM should maintain the updated life-cycle cost model and should establish clear policies and standards regarding the use of the model in particular, and life-cycle cost analyses in general, as part of the state's capital project review process; (2) the OFM should review all life-cycle cost analyses to ensure that the established policies and standards have been followed and that analyses have been conducted in a manner that is technically sound and accurate; and (3) the OFM should regularly update the cost assumptions in the life-cycle cost model.
History of Studies
Since 1977, at least five studies/reports and a Capital Budget Subcommittee have been tasked with reviewing space utilization policies and practices:
(1) 1977 Performance Audit by the Legislative Budget Committee (now JLARC);
(2) 1987 Office Space Study by the Legislative Budget Committee (now JLARC);
(3) 1991 Department of General Administration Property Development Study by the Washington State Commission for Efficiency and Accountability in Government;
(4) 1995 Performance Audit regarding Capital Planning and Budgeting: Study of Leasing Versus Ownership Costs by the Legislative Budget Committee (now JLARC);
(5) 1999 House Capital Budget Subcommittee on State Leasing Policy; and
(6) 2001 Analysis of Thurston County Lease and Space Planning by GA.
The reports include similar conclusions and recommendations, including:
The 1999 House Capital Budget Subcommittee (Subcommittee) on State Leasing Policy
addressed these issues by recommending that state agencies be restricted from entering into
lease agreements prior to constructing a building. In addition, the Subcommittee
recommended that the GA not enter into lease agreements on buildings larger than 20,000
square feet that are in the construction or planning stage of development unless the lease is
specifically approved by the Legislature. No action has been taken by the Legislature or the
GA on this recommendation.
The OFM Best Practices Report
The 2006 Supplemental Capital Budget required the OFM to report to the Legislature by September 1, 2007 on best practices for managing capital project costs; best practices in the state's capital budgeting process and public works contracting procedures; appropriate uses of alternative capital project financing; and risk management.
There are three main data systems for tracking state owned and occupied facilities throughout the state: (1) the GA's facilities data system; (2) the OFM's Facility Inventory System; and (3) the OFM's statewide accounting system.
(1) The GA's facilities data system: the GA's facilities data includes facilities leased, purchased or owned by GA on behalf of agencies and delegated leased space entered into by agencies.
(2) The OFM's Facility Inventory System: Statute requires agencies to provide an annual inventory of owned and leased facilities to the OFM who must develop and maintain an inventory system to account for all owned or leased facilities used by state government. OFM is required to publish a report summarizing the information contained in the inventory system by October 1 every year.
(3) The OFM's statewide accounting system: The state's accounting system has one object that commingles facility leases with other types of leases including furnishings, equipment, and software.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
By October 1, 2007, the OFM must consult with the Legislature to prepare an implementation plan to improve the oversight and management of state agency space. The plan must be submitted to the Governor and the Legislature.
By October 1, 2008, the OFM must, in consultation with the Legislature, design and implement a life-cycle cost analysis model based on the work completed by the JLARC in January 2007. The OFM must do the following with the life-cycle cost model:
The OFM must design and implement a modified predesign process for space requests to
lease, purchase, or build facilities for new state programs, expanded programs, or the
relocation of programs including the consolidation of multiple state agency tenants into one
facility. The OFM will define facilities that meet this criteria. The modified predesign must
include a problem statement, an analysis of alternatives to address programmatic and space
requirements, proposed locations and a financial assessment, and it must be submitted to the
OFM and the Legislature. Projects that are smaller than 20,000 square feet may provide a
cost-benefit analysis rather than a life-cycle cost analysis. Major projects, costing $5 million
or more, are not required to prepare a modified predesign.
The OFM's 10-year capital budget plan is required to include agencies' plans for major leased facilities, and agencies may not enter into new or renewed leases of more than $1 million per year unless the leases have been approved by the OFM, except in the case of an emergency. Agencies must identify operational costs savings, and may not enter into lease agreements for privately owned buildings that are under development unless the director of the OFM gives prior approval.
The OFM must work with the GA and other agencies to determine long-term facility needs to develop a six-year facilities plan to be submitted to the Legislature by January 1 every odd-numbered year, beginning in 2009. The six-year plan must include agency space requirements and other data necessary for facility planning.
The statute requiring the OFM to develop and maintain a facility inventory system is amended to require the inclusion of facility owners and for a report of the system to be submitted to the Legislature annually. The OFM must also report to the Legislature by September 1, 2008, on recommendations to improve the system, including the cost and implementation schedule. The report must include recommendations regarding accountability improvements and recommendations to assist in the evaluation of budget requests and facility management.
Before the GA acquires property through leases, purchases, rent or other means they must consult with the OFM.
The GA is required to report to the Legislature and the OFM annually on exemptions granted to facility efficiency standards, on delegated leases, and all facility leases executed for all agencies in the preceding year.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The substitute bill includes input from stakeholders that may contribute to strengthening state facility analysis and portfolio management. Agency reporting dates are revised to correspond with other existing reporting dates. The substitute bill includes a technical correction by eliminating the prohibition against using non-appropriation clauses for leases with terms of 10 years or less during the 2003-05 biennium.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) Concern about the amount of funds spent in the operating budget for debt service led to questions about how much of the operating budget is spent on facility leases and how decisions about leases or purchases are made. Lack of answers to these questions lead to the Joint Legislative Audit Review Committee (JLARC) update of the life-cycle cost study model. The JLARC concluded that there are current problems with accountability, efficiency, and transparency.
The bill requires that the Director of the Office of Financial Management (OFM) approve leases. This will lead to more accountability, efficiency, and transparency.
The Department of General Administration (GA) is working on a six-year facilities plan that includes a pilot. The pilot may be put on hold while implementing the bill. The GA needs a more comprehensive database for leased and owned portfolio management. The GA looks forward to working in partnership with the OFM to implement the bill.
The OFM is interested in good information that is usable. The structure and timing in the bill will produce usable information from agencies.
Persons Testifying: Representative Dunshee, prime sponsor; Linda Bremer, Department of General Administration; and Wolf Opitz, Office of Financial Management.