HOUSE BILL REPORT
SHB 2522
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House:
February 13, 2008
Title: An act relating to clarifying the civil penalty provisions for on- site sewage disposal systems administered by local health jurisdictions.
Brief Description: Regarding civil penalty provisions for on-site sewage disposal systems administered by local health jurisdictions.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Select Committee on Environmental Health (originally sponsored by Representatives Hudgins, Campbell and Chase).
Brief History:
Select Committee on Environmental Health: 1/16/08 [DPS].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 2/13/08, 94-2.
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 8 members: Representatives Campbell, Chair; Hudgins, Vice Chair; Sump, Ranking Minority Member; Chase, Hailey, Morrell, Newhouse and Wood.
Staff: Brad Avy (786-7289).
Background:
Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5894 that passed into law in 2007 added a new section to
RCW 70.118 that authorizes local health officers responsible for administering and enforcing
on-site sewage disposal system regulations to issue civil penalties for violations of those
regulations.
This authorization is under the same limitations and requirements imposed on the state
Department of Health under the large on-site sewage system statute's civil penalty provisions.
The intent of SHB 2522 is to clarify that the statutes and limitations under the general on-site
sewage system statute applies to local health jurisdictions and their administrative processes.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
The substitute bill amends the civil penalty provisions of the general on-site sewage disposal
systems statute and clarifies that these statutes and limitations apply to local health
jurisdictions and their administrative processes.
Civil Penalty Provisions
Every violation is a separate and distinct offense. In case of a continuing violation, each
day's continuing violation is a separate and distinct violation. The penalty assessed must
reflect the significance of the violation and the previous record of compliance on the part of
the person responsible for compliance with on-site sewage disposal system requirements.
Every person who, through an act of commission or omission, procures, aids or abets a
violation is subject to the penalty provisions.
The penalty provided for must be imposed by a notice in writing to the person against whom
the civil penalty is assessed and must describe the violation. The notice must be personally
served in the manner of service of a summons in a civil action or in a manner that shows
proof of receipt. A penalty imposed is due 28 days after receipt of notice unless application
for an appeal is filed.
Within 28 days after notice is received, the person incurring the penalty has the right to
appeal as governed by the local health jurisdiction's administrative appeals process. Notice
must be provided by the local health jurisdiction consistent with its due process requirements.
A penalty imposed by a final administrative order is due upon service of the final
administrative order. A person who fails to pay a penalty assessed by a final administrative
order within 30 days of service of the final administrative order shall pay, in addition to the
amount of the penalty: (1) interest at the rate of 1 percent of the unpaid balance of the
assessed penalty for each month or part of a month that the penalty remains unpaid,
commencing with the month in which the notice of penalty was served, and (2) reasonable
attorneys' fees as are incurred if civil enforcement of the final administrative order is required
to collect the penalty.
A person who institutes proceedings for judicial review of a final administrative order
assessing a civil penalty under this chapter shall place the full amount of the penalty in an
interest-bearing account in the registry of the reviewing court. At the conclusion of the
proceeding the court shall, as appropriate:
The judgment may award reasonable attorneys' fees for the cost of legal representation in
representing the local health jurisdiction.
If no appeal is taken from a final administrative order assessing a civil penalty, the local
health jurisdiction may file a certified copy of the final administrative order with the clerk of
the superior court in which the on-site sewage disposal system is located and the clerk shall
enter judgment in the name of the local health jurisdiction and in the amount of the penalty
assessed in the final administrative order.
A judgment entered has the same force and effect as, and is subject to, all of the provisions of
law relating to a judgment in a civil action, and may be enforced in the same manner as any
other judgment of the court in which it is entered.
The maximum penalty for violating a law or rule regulating general on-site sewage disposal
systems is $1,000 per violation.
All receipts from penalties imposed under this section shall be deposited into the General
Fund or funds of the entity or entities operating the local health jurisdiction.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) The bill and substitute bill clarifies what was done last year. All of this is
already in law, it just clarifies. Local government supported this bill when it was part of
another piece of legislation last session and continues to support it today. Mason County
rarely has the need to levy civil fines in the on-site program. For flagrant violations, when a
tool is needed, the previous penalty of $100 didn't pose much of a disincentive; but a $1,000
fine is a meaningful amount. Most installers and most homeowners want to do the right thing
and choose to do the right thing. A tool is needed to be able to address those, who on rare
occasions, simply do not want to work together. This bill does not change enforcement or
roles and responsibilities. It does not change, nor transfer, any local responsibilities. This
bill gives a stronger tool for potentially dealing with any recalcitrant folks on their septic
systems.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Representative Hudgins, prime sponsor; and Vicki Kirkpatrick, Mason County Health Department, Washington State Association of Counties, and Washington State Association of Public Health.