HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 2552
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Early Learning & Children's Services
Title: An act relating to parental consent to mental health treatment for minors.
Brief Description: Changing provisions relating to minors who voluntarily seek mental health treatment.
Sponsors: Representatives Dickerson, Appleton, Roberts, Wood, Kenney, Kagi and Darneille.
Brief History:
Early Learning & Children's Services: 1/31/08, 2/1/08 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON EARLY LEARNING & CHILDREN'S SERVICES
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 5 members: Representatives Kagi, Chair; Haler, Ranking Minority Member; Walsh, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Hinkle and Pettigrew.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 2 members: Representatives Roberts, Vice Chair; Goodman.
Staff: Sydney Forrester (786-7120).
Background:
The general rule for consent to both inpatient and outpatient mental health treatment for
children is that parental consent or authorization is required for children under the age of 13.
Youth ages 13 years and older have the right to consent on their own behalf to outpatient or
inpatient treatment without corresponding authorization from a parent. Exceptions to this
rule allow for parent-initiated treatment based on an evaluation of the child and a finding that
the treatment is medically necessary, and treatment initiated by a designated mental health
professional.
Parent-Initiated Treatment
When a parent brings a child, regardless of age, to a facility for examination or evaluation,
the consent of the minor is not required for admission, evaluation, and treatment.
Evaluations in cases of parent-initiated treatment must be completed within 24 hours, with
some exceptions for additional time, but in no case may a minor be held for evaluation longer
than 72 hours. If, based on the evaluation, the mental health professional determines
inpatient treatment is a medical necessity, the minor may be held for treatment. Within 24
hours of a decision to hold a minor for treatment absent the minor's consent, the facility must
notify the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS).
The DSHS then must conduct a review by an independent professional. The review must be
conducted after the first week and before the end of the second week after the child is brought
to the facility and must examine whether continuing the minor's inpatient treatment absent
consent is a medical necessity. In making the determination, the DSHS must consult with the
treatment provider and the child's parent.
If, based on the review, the DSHS determines inpatient treatment is no longer a medical
necessity, the DSHS must notify the facility and the child must be released to his/her parents
within 24 hours. If, however, the treatment provider and the parent disagree with the
decision to release the child, the child shall not be released until after the second judicial day
following the determination in order to allow the parent time to file an at-risk youth petition.
If after review, the DSHS determines outpatient treatment for the child is a medical necessity
and the child declines such outpatient treatment, the child's refusal is grounds for filing of an
at-risk youth petition.
Following the review conducted by the DSHS, a youth who is not released may petition the
court for release from the facility by filing a petition five or more days following the review.
The court shall order the child released unless the court finds by a preponderance of the
evidence that it is a medical necessity for the child to remain at the facility.
If the child is not released on the basis of the petition to the court, the child may be held for a
maximum of 30 days following the date of the DSHS review or the filing of the petition to
the court, whichever is later, unless a designated mental health professional initiates
proceedings to have the child detained, evaluated, or admitted.
Medical Necessity
For purposes of inpatient treatment, medical necessity means that the treatment to be
provided is reasonable calculated to:
(a) diagnose, correct, cure, or alleviate an organic, mental or emotional impairment that
substantially and adversely affects the person's functioning; or
(b) prevent the exacerbation of mental conditions that endanger life or cause suffering
and pain, or result in illness or infirmity or threaten to cause or aggravate a disability
or cause a physical deformity or malfunction, and there is no adequate less restrictive
alternative available.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
A parent of a minor age 13 years or older can consent, on behalf of the minor, to outpatient or
inpatient mental health treatment without the minor also consenting. The right of a minor age
13 or older to consent to outpatient and inpatient mental health treatment on his/her own is
retained.
When a parent consents to outpatient or inpatient treatment or on behalf of a minor age 13
years or older:
(1) A parent's consent must be supported by a recommendation for such treatment from a
psychiatrist, psychologist, or other licensed mental health professional with
significant experience in the treatment of children with mental health disorders who
has examined the minor.
(2) Prior to initiating outpatient treatment or within 48 hours of admission to an inpatient
facility, a child psychiatrist or psychologist must conduct a complete assessment of
the minor and his/her family.
The assessment becomes part of the treatment record and must include determinations
regarding:
(1) whether the minor has a mental disorder for which treatment is a medical necessity;
(2) the relationship between the minor and his/her parents; and
(3) any other factors relevant to meeting the minor's need for mental health treatment.
At the beginning of treatment, the minor must be given a written explanation of the treatment
that will be provided. The minor also must be provided notice of his/her right to petition the
court to modify or terminate the consent to treatment.
Within 24 hours of outpatient treatment being initiated or of the child being admitted for
inpatient treatment, the treatment provider must notify the superior court. The court must
give the treatment provider the name and phone number of a contracted attorney. The
treatment provider must immediately contact the attorney on behalf of the minor. The
contracted attorney must meet with the minor within 24 hours, if the minor has been admitted
for inpatient treatment, or within three days if the minor has initiated outpatient treatment. If,
after meeting with the attorney, the minor wants to object to treatment, the attorney must file
a petition with the court within two business days of meeting with the minor.
Once the petition is filed, the court must conduct a hearing within 72 hours following the
filing of the petition. In order for the court to order the treatment to continue against the
child's wishes, the court must find all of the following by a preponderance of the evidence:
(1) the minor has a mental health disorder or needs an evaluation to determine whether
there is a mental health disorder;
(2) mental health treatment is a medical necessity; and
(3) the minor's disorder can be adequately treated by the proposed treatment provider.
The initial period of treatment allowed is up to 30 days for inpatient treatment and up to 90
days for outpatient treatment. If, at the end of the period of treatment ordered, the minor's
treatment provider believes additional treatment is necessary, the court must conduct another
review hearing to determine whether the minor should be released, or ordered to participate
in additional treatment. The court may order additional inpatient treatment for up to 60 days
or additional outpatient treatment for up to 90 days. The total period of treatment ordered can
not exceed:
(1) six months for outpatient treatment; or
(2) three months for inpatient treatment.
Regardless of the time ordered by the court for treatment, a minor must be discharged from
treatment whenever the following occurs:
(1) the treatment provider determines the minor is no longer in need of treatment; or
(2) the minor's parent revokes consent to treatment.
A parent cannot revoke a minor's consent to mental health treatment. A parent can revoke
his/her own consent to treatment, but such revocation is ineffective if the minor has
independently consented to treatment. A parent or other person with legal custody or rights
to residential time with a child under a court order may object to consent by the other parent.
The objecting parent may not, however, file a petition in objection if the consenting parent
has sole decision-making authority regarding health care or medical care for the minor.
The definitions for inpatient treatment and outpatient treatment both are amended to include
medication and medication supervision. The definition of outpatient treatment also is
amended to include services outside those provided by a regional support network.
The Administrative Office of the Courts, in consultation with the DSHS and other interested
organizations, must develop the statement of rights and standard forms for use in a minor's
petition to the court challenging a parent's consent to treatment. The statement and forms
must be designed to be readily understood and completed by 13-year-old youth.
Current provisions relating to parent-initiated inpatient treatment are repealed.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The substitute bill makes the following changes to the original bill:
(1) Rather than the treatment provider giving the minor the forms required to petition the
court to challenge the treatment, helping the minor fill out the forms, and filing the forms
with the court, the substitute bill directs the treatment provider to notify the superior
court. The court must give the treatment provider the name of an attorney under contract
for involuntary commitment proceedings. The treatment provider must contact the
attorney. The attorney must then meet with the minor to determine if the minor wants to
challenge the treatment, and must file a petition on behalf of a minor who wants to object
or terminate treatment.
(2) For outpatient treatment, the time frames for treatment to which the minor does not
consent are three months of initial treatment, with an additional three months allowed if
ordered by the court.
(3) The DSHS or other supervising agency, including foster parents licensed by the DSHS or
other supervising agency cannot use the provisions of the bill.
(4) The definition of outpatient treatment is amended to specify that services are not limited
to those provided through Regional Support Networks.
(5) The definitions of inpatient treatment and outpatient treatment are amended to include
medication and medication supervision as part of treatment.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 29, 2008.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The act takes effect on January 1, 2010.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support of original bill) This bill supports the goal that all children who need mental
health treatment get such treatment. It will assure that children who are 13 years and older
get services when they need them. This is a very different approach than previously
presented. It gives consent rights to both the parent and the child. Children who want mental
health services and whose parents don't support the decision still can access needed
treatment. When parents want their child to obtain necessary treatment, it gives the right to
consent to the parent, but builds in appropriate safeguards along the way. There is nothing
that leaves a parent feeling so helpless as when a child refuses the help he or she so
desperately needs. The ages between 13 and 18 years of age are very critical and for some
youth it is the time when severe mental health needs begin to emerge. Parents need the
ability to consent on behalf of children who may be so mentally ill they cannot adequately
assess their own needs. Developmental studies on the teenage brain show that teenage
capacity is not that of adults, especially if the teen suffers from mental illness. Children often
are not capable of making the final decision about their treatment needs on their own.
A parent who knows his or her child is mentally ill and needs treatment may have little ability
to get the child into treatment under our current system. This approach builds off the work of
the Legislature and acknowledges years of testimony on the need for mental health services
for children and the frustration parents feel when they are unable to get their child into
treatment. It is an onerous process for a parent to get a child involuntarily committed. The
current process available to parents often gets a child who may be violent sent to juvenile
detention instead of treatment where they can get appropriate assistance. Parents do not want
their children sent to juvenile hall – they want their children to receive appropriate treatment.
This bill provides a vehicle to further support parents and children in accessing needed
services.
The implementation date is delayed until 2010.
(With concerns on original bill) The Superior Court Judges Association had some concerns
with the original bill but this has been a work in progress and those concerns may be
addressed in the substitute. The judges are agreeable with putting a mechanism in place but
want to make sure all steps are covered, including clarity about what decisions the judges
need to make, and assuring they have the information necessary to make those decisions.
The Washington State Psychiatric Association (Association) has some concerns solely with
respect to the outpatient provisions of the original bill. There concerns may be addressed in
the substitute but the Association has not had time to review the substitute closely.
(Opposed) The substitute does address some concerns from the original bill relating to due
process. One area where the bill may fall short is in not admitting that this process is
involuntary commitment. There also are concerns regarding how medical necessity is
defined.
Persons Testifying: (In support of original bill) Representative Dickerson, prime sponsor;
Jeff Howard, Mental Health Ombudsman; Sherry Axson; and Seth Dawson, National
Alliance of Mental Illness.
(With concerns on original bill) Martha Harden Cesar, Superior Court Judges Association;
and Seth Dawson, Washington State Psychiatric Association.
(Opposed) Steven Pearce, Citizen's Commission on Human Rights.