HOUSE BILL REPORT
SHB 2621
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House:
February 18, 2008
Title: An act relating to requiring certain sentences for vehicular homicide and vehicular assault to run consecutively.
Brief Description: Requiring certain sentences for vehicular homicide and vehicular assault to run consecutively.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Judiciary (originally sponsored by Representatives Hurst, Lantz and Simpson).
Brief History:
Judiciary: 1/30/08, 2/5/08 [DPS].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 2/18/08, 94-1.
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 8 members: Representatives Lantz, Chair; Goodman, Vice Chair; Rodne, Ranking Minority Member; Warnick, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Ahern, Kirby, Ross and Williams.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 3 members: Representatives Flannigan, Moeller and Pedersen.
Staff: Jim Morishima (786-7191).
Background:
A person is guilty of Vehicular Assault if he or she drives any vehicle and causes substantial
bodily harm to another while: (a) under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drug; (b)
driving recklessly; or (c) driving with disregard for the safety of others. Vehicular Assault by
intoxicating liquor or drug or by driving recklessly is a class B felony with a seriousness level
of IV (3-9 months in jail for a first offense). Vehicular Assault by driving with disregard for
the safety of others is a class B felony with a seriousness level of III (1-3 months in jail for a
first offense).
A person is guilty of Vehicular Homicide if he or she proximately causes, within three years,
the death of another by driving any vehicle: (a) under the influence of intoxicating liquor or
drug; (b) in a reckless manner; or (c) with disregard for the safety of others. Vehicular
Homicide by intoxicating liquor or drug is a class A felony with a seriousness level of IX
(31-41 months in prison for a first offense). Vehicular Homicide by driving recklessly is a
class A felony with a seriousness level of VIII (21-27 months in prison for a first offense).
Vehicular Homicide by driving with disregard for the safety of others is a class A felony with
a seriousness level of VII (15-20 months in prison).
When a court sentences an offender for multiple offenses, the sentences for the offenses
generally run concurrently (simultaneously). The sentences may, however, run consecutively
(one after the other) under certain circumstances. For example, a court may impose
consecutive sentences if certain aggravating circumstances are found to exist. Also, a court
must impose consecutive sentences for serious violent offenses and firearms-related offenses
under certain circumstances.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
A court must impose consecutive sentences for one or more convictions for Vehicular
Assault by intoxicating liquor or drug, Vehicular Homicide by intoxicating liquor or drug, or
a combination of the two offenses, unless the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence
that imposition of consecutive sentences would be inconsistent with the purposes of the
Sentencing Reform Act.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on substitute bill on February 6, 2008.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) The sentences for vehicular homicide and vehicular assault involving multiple
victims are too short, given the impact of the offenses on the families and friends of the
victims. This makes the victims of these crimes feel like there is no justice and that deaths
caused by drunk driving are trivialized. When multiple lives are taken, it is unjust to lump all
of the sentences into one. This bill will give judges the ability to impose more appropriate
sentences in these cases and will make Washington a leader in putting a stop to drunk
driving. Although there is a fiscal cost to this bill, the state must invest in prevention because
of the human cost of DUI.
(Opposed) Judges already have the authority to impose consecutive sentences in exceptional
circumstances. This bill could make the sentences for Vehicular Homicide and Vehicular
Assault more severe than sentences for violent offenses.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Hurst, prime sponsor; Richard Morrow;
Kathleen Gilbert; Kathy Schuster; Gordon Schuster; Nora Sizemore; and Joan Oquist.
(Opposed) Jean Soliz-Conklin, Sentencing Guidelines Committee.