HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 2791
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed Legislature
Title: An act relating to distressed property conveyances.
Brief Description: Concerning distressed property conveyances.
Sponsors: By Representatives Lantz, Rodne and Kelley; by request of Attorney General.
Brief History:
Judiciary: 1/22/08, 2/1/08 [DP].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 2/6/08, 96-0.
Senate Amended.
Passed Senate: 3/6/08, 39-6.
House Refused to Concur.
Senate Amended.
Passed Senate: 3/11/08, 46-3.
House Concurred.
Passed House: 3/12/08, 97-0.
Passed Legislature.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 10 members: Representatives Lantz, Chair; Goodman, Vice Chair; Rodne, Ranking Minority Member; Warnick, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Ahern, Kirby, Moeller, Pedersen, Ross and Williams.
Staff: Trudes Tango (786-7384).
Background:
Credit Services Organization Act and Equity Skimming Laws.
Certain practices involving foreclosure of real property are governed by Washington law.
The Credit Services Organization Act (CSOA) applies to any company that performs, or
claims it performs, certain services for a person such as stopping, preventing, or delaying a
foreclosure, in return for a fee or some other consideration. The CSOA requires licensing
and bonding of certain credit service organizations, requires a written contract with a right of
cancellation, and makes a violation of the CSOA a Consumer Protection Act (CPA)
violation.
"Equity skimming" practices are used to obtain title to properties for the purpose of either
taking the equity out of the property or obtaining rents or payments on the property without
satisfying any of the underlying obligations that may exist on the property. For example, a
person induces a homeowner who is in financial distress to deed the property to the person,
with the assurance that the person will assume the underlying debt on the property. The
person never assumes the debt, but instead rents or sells the property and diverts value from
the property to his or her own personal use. The property is eventually foreclosed. In
Washington, equity skimming is a class B felony and a violation of the CPA.
Consumer Protection Act.
Under the CPA, the Attorney General may bring an action in the name of the state against any
person to restrain and prevent an unlawful action. The CPA also allows any person who is
injured in his or her business or property by a CPA violation to bring a civil action to stop the
violator from further actions and to recover actual damages, plus reasonable attorneys' fees.
In addition, the court may award the plaintiff treble damages (three times the actual damages
sustained) not to exceed $10,000.
Foreclosure Rescue Transactions.
Homeowners who are late, or at risk of being late in their mortgage payments or have
defaulted on their mortgage, may be approached with offers to assist them with their
mortgage problems. Several types of assistance may be offered. First, a person may offer to
buy the homeowner's house and allow the homeowner to continue to live there as a tenant.
The buyer may make representations before the sale that after a certain period of time, the
homeowner will have paid enough rent to get his or her home back. This is commonly
referred to as a sale-leaseback transaction. Second, a homeowner may be approached with an
offer of a "foreclosure surplus sale." When a foreclosed house is auctioned off, the sale may
bring more money than is due on the mortgage. That additional money is called "surplus
equity." In a foreclosure surplus sale, the homeowner assigns his or her right to the surplus
equity to the buyer for a lump sum. Third, other types of services may be offered to the
homeowner. For instance, a person may offer to negotiate with the lender on the
homeowner's behalf or offer to arrange a sale of the home that includes an option for the
homeowner to repurchase it in the future.
Summary of Bill:
The equity skimming laws are expanded to cover distressed home consultants and distressed
home conveyances.
Distressed Home Consultants.
A distressed home consultant is: (1) a person who contacts a distressed homeowner and
offers to perform certain services for the homeowner, such as stopping a foreclosure sale,
assisting the homeowner in refinancing a loan, obtaining an option to purchase the distressed
property after foreclosure, arranging a repurchase option for the homeowner, or other
services; or (2) a person who systematically contacts property owners whose homes are in
foreclosure or in danger of foreclosure. A property is "in danger of foreclosure" if: (1) the
homeowner has defaulted on a mortgage or is at least 30 days delinquent on a loan secured by
the property; or (2) the homeowner has a good faith belief that he or she is likely to default on
the mortgage within four months due to lack of funds and the homeowner reports that belief
to any one of a number of persons, including a mortgage broker, real estate broker, an
attorney, a mortgage or credit counselor, or any other party to a distressed home consulting
transaction.
"Distressed home consultant" does not mean a financial institution, a nonprofit credit
counseling service, a licensed attorney, a person subject to the mortgage loan servicing laws,
or a licensed mortgage broker who procures a nonpurchase mortgage loan for the
homeowner.
A distressed home consultant has a fiduciary duty to a distressed homeowner and must act in
the homeowner's best interest, disclose all material facts to the homeowner, use reasonable
care in performing his or her duties, and provide an accounting to the homeowner. Distressed
home consultant transactions must be in writing and contain certain notice to the homeowner.
A person may not waive any provisions governing distressed home transactions and
distressed home conveyances.
Distressed Home Conveyances.
A distressed home conveyance is a transaction in which: (1) a foreclosed homeowner
transfers an interest in the distressed property to a distressed home purchaser; (2) the
purchaser allows the foreclosed homeowner to occupy the property; and (3) the purchaser
conveys or promises to convey the property to the foreclosed homeowner; or provides the
foreclosed homeowner with an option to purchase the property at a later date; or promises the
foreclosed homeowner an interest in, or portion of, the proceeds of any resale of the property.
A distressed home conveyance must be by written contract and the homeowner has a right to
cancel the contract within five business days. The contract must be in at least 12 point
boldface type, be in the same language principally used by the parties, and specify certain
information, including: the total consideration to be provided by the purchaser in connection
with or incident to the sale; a complete description of the terms of payment; the time at which
possession is to be transferred to the purchaser; a complete description of the terms of any
related agreement designed to allow the foreclosed homeowner to remain in the home; a
complete description of the interest, if any, the foreclosed homeowner maintains in the
proceeds of, or consideration to be paid upon, the resale of the property; the notice of right of
cancellation; and notice that the purchaser cannot ask the foreclosed homeowner to sign any
deed or other document until the right of cancellation has ended.
Cancellation occurs when the foreclosed homeowner delivers to the purchaser by any means
a written notice of the cancellation. A notice of cancellation is not required to take a
particular form, but the purchaser must attach a notice of cancellation form to the contract
provided to the foreclosed homeowner.
A distressed home purchaser is prohibited from doing specific acts and practices listed in the
bill. The purchaser must not enter into, or attempt to enter into, a distressed home
conveyance unless the purchaser verifies and can demonstrate that the foreclosed homeowner
has a reasonable ability to pay for the subsequent conveyance of an interest back to the
foreclosed homeowner.
A purchaser must either: (1) ensure that title to the property has been reconveyed to the
foreclosed homeowner; or (2) make payment to the foreclosed homeowner so that the
foreclosed homeowner has received consideration in an amount of at least 82 percent of the
fair market value of the property as of the date of the eviction or voluntary relinquishment of
possession of the property by the foreclosed homeowner.
The purchaser must extinguish or assume all liens encumbering the distressed home
immediately following the conveyance of the distressed home, and must close the
conveyance in person before an independent third party authorized to conduct real estate
closings within the state. The purchaser must not enter into repurchase or lease terms that are
unfair or commercially unreasonable. The purchaser must not represent that he or she is
acting as an advisor or consultant or acting on behalf of or in the interests of the foreclosed
homeowner or acting to save the home or buy time. Other prohibitions are listed in the bill.
A violation of the act is a per se violation of the CPA. An action for violating the act may
only be brought by a foreclosed homeowner against whom the violation was committed or by
the Attorney General. In a private right of action under the CPA, the court may double or
triple the damages award, subject to the statutory limit. However, if the court determines that
the defendant acted in bad faith, the limit for doubling or tripling the damages award may be
increased up to $100,000. A claim for damages must be commenced within four years after
the date of the alleged violation. A CPA action is in addition to any other remedy available.
An action under the CPA does not affect the rights in the distressed home held by a distressed
home purchaser for value under the act or other applicable law.
Unlawful Detainer Actions.
In any unlawful detainer action (eviction) under the Residential Landlord Tenant Act, the
plaintiff to the action must disclose to the court whether the defendant/tenant previously held
title to the property and explain how the plaintiff came to acquire title. When a defendant
claims that the plaintiff acquired title through a distressed home conveyance, there must be an
automatic stay of the unlawful detainer action and consolidation of the action with a pending
or subsequent quiet title action. In addition, a defendant who previously held title to property
that was a distressed home is not required to escrow any money pending trial when a material
question of fact exists as to whether the plaintiff acquired title from the defendant directly or
indirectly through a distressed home conveyance.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) This bill prevents the practice of preying on vulnerable people about to lose their
homes. This is a consumer protection bill. There has been a dramatic increase in
foreclosures in Washington and that has created a thriving industry of foreclosure scams.
Purchasers claim that they can stop the foreclosure, and they induce the homeowner to sign
documents that eventually strip the homeowner of all rights to the property. These scams are
a way to obtain title without paying fair price. Homeowners believe they have a contract
right to repurchase, but those terms are usually vague and unenforceable. These foreclosure
scams are happening nationwide. The bill sets the ground rules and is based on laws from
other states. The bill requires that all the terms of a contract be in writing and the purchaser
cannot contract if there is a power of attorney. The bill requires that when the parties enter
into a contract, the homeowner has a real chance to repurchase the home. There is a five day
right of cancellation and the purchaser must take responsibility of the underlying debt. The
rules established in the bill are similar to truth-in-lending principles.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Representative Lantz, prime sponsor; Robin Hunt, Washington
Association of County Treasurers; Jim Sugarman, Attorney General's Office; and
Sandra Gamble.