Washington State House of Representatives |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Transportation Committee | |
HB 2969
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Requiring local bridge owners to maintain, replace, or appropriate funds for bridges deemed to be especially deficient.
Sponsors: Representatives Hudgins, Hasegawa and Upthegrove.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 1/31/08
Staff: Kathryn Leathers (786-7114).
Background:
Bridge Assessments
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requires every state to provide assessments of all
state-owned and locally-owned bridges that are located on public roads and are greater than 20
feet in length. In Washington, the Washington State Department of Transportation (Department)
is the agency responsible for providing all bridge assessments to the FHWA.
A bridge assessment includes the most recent bridge inspection report, and results in a
sufficiency rating based on federal standards established pursuant to the National Bridge
Inspection Standards. Typically, bridges must be inspected no less than once every two years;
however, some bridges must be inspected more frequently (based on age, detected deficiencies,
and other considerations), and usually new bridges are not required to be inspected more than
once every four years.
The Department usually inspects and monitors only state-owned bridges, and local jurisdictions
are responsible for inspecting and monitoring their own bridges. The Department's role in
regards to locally-owned bridges is to ensure that local jurisdictions are inspecting and reporting
as required under federal law, and to provide quality assurance by periodically reviewing local
bridge files and conducting field reviews of local bridge inspections.
The federal bridge inspection standards were initially created to serve as a funding tool, not as a
safety rating tool, for the purpose of determining eligibility and priority for federal rehabilitation
and replacement funds. Pursuant to the federal standards, a sufficiency rating (SR) is assigned to
each bridge using a scale of 0 to 100. Generally speaking, the lower the SR, the higher the
priority for federal funding.
To qualify for federal bridge replacement funds, a bridge must have a SR of less than 50 and be
either structurally deficient or functionally obsolete. To be eligible for rehabilitation funds, a
bridge must have a SR of between 50 and 80 and also be either structurally deficient or
functionally obsolete.
As defined by the FHWA, a structurally deficient bridge is one whose condition or design has
impacted its ability to adequately carry its intended traffic loads. A functionally obsolete bridge
is one in which the deck geometry, load carrying capacity, clearance, or approach roadway
alignment has reduced its ability to adequately meet the traffic needs below accepted design
standards.
Determining the SR number for any bridge is a complex calculation that indicates a bridge's
relative ability to serve its intended purpose. The SR is a summation of four values: (1)
structural adequacy and safety; (2) serviceability and functional obsolescence; (3) essentiality for
public use; and (4) special reductions.
Although lower SRs typically indicate that a bridge has more structural and functional problems
than higher rated bridges, a low SR (even a rating of 0) does not mean that the bridge is unsafe
for all uses. A key indicator of a bridge inspector's initial concern regarding the safety of a
bridge is whether load capacity has been restricted. Bridges that are deemed to be unsafe for all
purposes are closed.
Distribution of State Motor Vehicle Fuel Taxes
Before May 1 of each year, the County Road Administration Board sends the State Treasurer a
certificate of good practice on behalf of counties for compliance with reporting and other
requirements during the preceding year. If a certificate of good practice is issued, after certain
statutory deductions are made, the State Treasurer distributes to each county the amount of state
motor vehicle fuel taxes to which the county is entitled. If a certificate of good practice is not
issued, the State Treasurer withholds from each non-compliant county its share of the fuel taxes.
Motor vehicle fuel taxes withheld from any county are not distributed to any other county;
instead, they are retained in the motor vehicle fund to the credit of the county entitled to the
funds until such time as the State Treasurer receives a certificate of good practice or conditional
certificate.
For cities and towns, after certain statutory deductions are made, the State Treasurer appropriates
any remaining state motor vehicle fuel taxes on a monthly basis to cities and towns ratably on the
basis of population as determined by the Office of Financial Management.
Summary of Bill:
Cities and counties that own or jointly own bridges with a sufficiency rating (SR) of less than 10
must, within six months of the most recent sufficiency rating report, either (1) begin to repair or
rehabilitate the bridge such that the bridge's SR exceeds 80; or (2) develop and adopt a finance
plan to fully fund the repair, rehabilitation, or replacement of the bridge.
Beginning to repair or rehabilitate a bridge is defined to exclude preconstruction design,
environmental, or other preconstruction analysis.
If the city or county chooses to develop a finance plan, until the finance plan is implemented and
construction has begun, the bridge owner or owners must appropriate from their funding sources
into a dedicated account at least 50 percent of the total estimated cost to repair, rehabilitate, or
replace the bridge.
In the case of jointly-owned bridges, the owners share compliance responsibilities equally unless
otherwise provided in an interlocal agreement.
By December 2008, and annually thereafter, the Department must submit a report to the
Legislature, State Treasurer, and County Road Administration Board on the status of each
locally-owned bridge with a SR of less than 10. The report must include a determination of
whether cities and counties are in compliance with the requirement to either begin repairs or to
develop a finance plan.
In each case the Department makes a determination of non-compliance, the State Treasurer must
withhold a portion of state motor vehicle fuel taxes to which the city or county would otherwise
be entitled. The taxes withheld are not distributed to another city or county; rather, they are
retained in the motor vehicle fund to the credit of the city or county originally entitled to the
funds. The amount of motor vehicle fuel tax withheld varies as follows:
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.