HOUSE BILL REPORT
2SHB 3227
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House:
February 15, 2008
Title: An act relating to protecting Hood Canal by removing nitrates and phosphates from on-site sewage disposal systems and wastewater treatment plants.
Brief Description: Protecting the water quality in Hood Canal.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Apps Subcom GG (originally sponsored by Representatives Eickmeyer, Sump, Chase, Quall, Hasegawa, Appleton, Simpson, Haigh, Wallace, Dickerson, Takko, Conway, Pedersen, Kagi, Armstrong, Priest, Walsh, Hinkle, Condotta, McCoy, Roberts, Morris, Hudgins, Rolfes, Lantz, Schual-Berke, Morrell, Campbell, Sells, Sullivan, Kenney and Linville).
Brief History:
Select Committee on Environmental Health: 1/29/08, 1/31/08 [DPS];
Appropriations Subcommittee on General Government & Audit Review: 2/5/08, 2/7/08[DP2S(w/o sub ENVH)].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 2/15/08, 94-0.
Brief Summary of Second Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 8 members: Representatives Campbell, Chair; Hudgins, Vice Chair; Sump, Ranking Minority Member; Chase, Hunt, Morrell, Newhouse and Wood.
Staff: Brad Avy (786-7289).
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE ON GENERAL GOVERNMENT & AUDIT REVIEW
Majority Report: The second substitute bill be substituted therefor and the second substitute bill do pass and do not pass the substitute bill by Committee on Select Committee on Environmental Health. Signed by 14 members: Representatives Linville, Chair; Ericks, Vice Chair; Armstrong, Ranking Minority Member; Skinner, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Alexander, Blake, Chandler, Kretz, Lantz, Liias, Miloscia, Morris, Nelson and Van De Wege.
Staff: Alicia Dunkin (786-7178).
Background:
Hood Canal is a glacier-carved fjord approximately 60 miles in length with approximately
180 miles of shoreline. Portions of Hood Canal have had low dissolved oxygen
concentrations for many years. The University of Washington recorded low dissolved
oxygen concentrations in the 1950s. In recent years, low dissolved oxygen concentration
conditions and significant fish kill events have been recorded on Hood Canal. Research and
monitoring related to Hood Canal's low dissolved oxygen concentrations is underway to
improve data on nitrogen loading from on-site septic systems, groundwater, and other sources
in Hood Canal.
In 2005 authority was provided to establish Aquatic Rehabilitation Zones (ARZ) for areas
whose surrounding marine water bodies pose serious environmental or public health
concerns. The first ARZ, known as ARZ One, was created for the watersheds that drain into
Hood Canal south of a line projected from Tala Point in Jefferson County to Foulweather
Bluff in Kitsap County.
Summary of Second Substitute Bill:
For ARZ One, any new or retrofitted on-site sewage disposal systems installed after July 1,
2009 may not discharge to ground or surface waters more than 20 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
of total nitrogen.
For ARZ One, any new or retrofitted wastewater treatment system installed after July 1,
2009, must use all known, available, and reasonable methods of nitrogen removal.
By December 1, 2008, the Department of Health (DOH) and the Department of Ecology
(DOE) shall jointly report to the Legislature regarding the impact of removing phosphates
from the discharge of on-site sewage disposal systems and wastewater treatment systems in
ARZ One.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 4, 2008.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed. However, the bill is null and void unless funded in the budget.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: (Select Committee on Environmental Health)
(In support) Hood Canal takes a year or more to exchange water. The Hood Canal has been
polluted for many years. Studies have been going on for three years concerned with what was
causing a lack of dissolved oxygen and killing off wildlife in Hood Canal. Studies show that
nitrogen is one of the causes of excess nutrients. Phytoplankton survives on nitrogen,
warmth, and sunshine which leads to algae blooms. When this happens, the phytoplankton
die and sink to the canal bottom and then deteriorate and burn up all the oxygen. The
evidence shows that taking nitrates out of the water is one of the major steps in solving the
problem that faces the Hood Canal. There is a need to look at new technologies to take
nitrates out of the system. Other factors relate to deciduous trees. Alder trees collect
nitrogen and then release nitrogen when they fall into the water. Nature's balance has been
upset in Hood Canal. The canal can be restored back to basic health. The canal should be
used not abused. Southern shorelines are urbanized. Nutrients humans produce are trapped
and then released into the canal. For many years, sewage was just piped straight into the
canal. Development of homes on small lots occurred with inadequate systems and not
enough room. New systems provide a major step forward. The canal's immune system has
been compromised with the loss of the geoduck clam. They can clean a lot of water. This
bill is the first big step to clean up Hood Canal.
(In support of the substitute) The DOE would like to recognize Representative Eickmeyer for
the passion he has exhibited for Hood Canal and the hard work and leadership that he has
shown over the last few years. The DOE supports the substitute. There are several on-site
technologies on the market now that can meet the nitrogen standards. There is a great cost to
not cleaning up Hood Canal, to ourselves and future generations. The People for Puget
Sound is in strong support of this legislation and want to compliment Representative
Eickmeyer for his leadership. This is an issue that has been endlessly discussed and debated.
The real issue has been that the DOH standards are based on human health standards and this
is an environmental problem. There are some added costs. Six systems have already passed
federal standards for nitrogen treatment. Prices range from $4,000 to $10,000 in addition to
the cost for traditional treatment.
(Concerns) There is concern about the number of septic systems that are out there that can
meet this requirement. There is also concern about systems that are already meeting the new
DOH standards of two years ago. There is a need to bring failing systems up to standards.
(Opposed) None.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: (Appropriations Subcommittee on General
Government & Audit Review)
(In support) We have had a very good team of scientists evaluating Hood Canal and they
came to the same conclusion of all the other world scientists, which is that nitrogen is very
bad for marine waters. All new or retrofitted on-site septic systems have to address nitrogen
– it is inevitable and we should get started. The Department of Ecology shared their
assumptions about the bill with the Departments of Health and Community, Trade and
Economic Development and we don't think there is a fiscal impact to the bill because we can
complete the tasks in this bill within existing resources.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (Select Committee on Environmental Health) (In support)
Representative Eickmeyer, prime sponsor; and Yoshe Revelle.
(In support of the substitute) Melodie Selby, Department of Ecology; and Bruce Wishart,
People for Puget Sound.
(Concerns) Jennifer Kunkel, Building Industry Association of Washington.
Persons Testifying: (Appropriations Subcommittee on General Government & Audit Review) Melodie Selby, Washington Department of Ecology; and Bruce Wishart, People for Puget Sound.