Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
State Government & Tribal Affairs Committee | |
HJR 4218
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Requiring a sixty percent vote for emergency clauses.
Sponsors: Representatives Bailey, Alexander, Curtis, Buri, Hinkle, Ericks, Chandler, Dunn, Priest, Sump, Anderson, Haler, Kristiansen, Ahern, McCune and Kretz.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 2/27/07
Staff: Marsha Reilly (786-7135).
Background:
The State Constitution allows that a referendum may be ordered on any act, bill, or law passed
by the legislature, except those laws necessary for the "immediate preservation of the public
peace, health or safety, support of the state government and its existing public institutions."
Commonly referred to as an "emergency clause," the courts have held that this language
describes two separate and distinct categories of acts not subject to referendum. The first relates
to the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, and the other for the support
of the state government and its existing public institutions.
Summary of Bill:
Language in the Constitution is changed to require that bills, acts, or laws containing an
emergency clause, except for the operating, capital, and transportation budget bills, must receive
an affirmative vote of 60 percent of the members of each house of the legislature to be exempted
from referendum. If the joint resolution is approved by the Legislature, the constitutional
amendment will be placed on the November general election ballot for approval by the people.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.