HOUSE BILL REPORT
HJR 4223
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Judiciary
Brief Description: Providing for the appointment of justices of the supreme court.
Sponsors: Representatives B. Sullivan, Rodne, Appleton, Sommers and Ormsby.
Brief History:
Judiciary: 2/20/07, 2/26/07 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 6 members: Representatives Lantz, Chair; Goodman, Vice Chair; Rodne, Ranking Minority Member; Ahern, Moeller and Pedersen.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 3 members: Representatives Kirby, Ross and Williams.
Staff: Edie Adams (786-7180).
Background:
Article IV, Section 3 of the Washington Constitution provides that justices of the Supreme
Court are to be elected by the qualified voters of the state for a term of six years. If a
vacancy occurs in a Supreme Court justice position, the Governor appoints a person to fill
the vacancy until a justice is elected at the next general election to fill the vacancy for the
remainder of the unexpired term.
Article IV, Section 30 of the Washington Constitution provides that the manner of election
and terms of office of judges of the Court of Appeals are to be provided by statute. By
statute, judges of the Court of Appeals also are elected to six-year terms and a vacancy in a
Court of Appeals judge position is filled in the same manner as a vacancy in a Supreme
Court justice position.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
An amendment is proposed to Article IV, Section 3 of the Washington Constitution that
would change the method of selecting justices of the Supreme Court to appointment by the
Governor with retention elections, as provided in law.
An amendment is proposed to Article IV, Section 30 of the Washington Constitution to
replace a reference to the manner of election of Court of Appeals judges with a reference to
their manner of selection.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The proposed substitute joint resolution clarifies that the appointment of Supreme Court
justices by the Governor is as provided by law. The proposed substitute joint resolution also
includes an amendment to Article IV, Section 30 of the State Constitution to provide that the
manner of selection (rather than election) of Court of Appeals judges is as provided by
statute.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) The constitutional amendment is necessary in order to establish appointment of
Supreme Court justices and Court of Appeals judges. The constitutional amendment should
include the creation of the Judicial Nominating Commission so that the people know what
type of system they are voting for when we ask them to change the State Constitution. There
should also be an amendment to the constitutional provision relating to Court of Appeals
judges.
(Opposed) The State Constitution should not be amended to do away with the longstanding
policy in this state of providing accountability of judges through election.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Rodne; Charlie Wiggins, American
Judicature Society; Judge William Baker, Washington Court of Appeals; and William
Andersen, University of Washington Law School.
(Opposed) Chief Justice Gerry Alexander and Vickie Churchill, Board for Judicial
Administration.