HOUSE BILL REPORT
2SSB 5092
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House - Amended:
April 9, 2007
Title: An act relating to contracts with associate development organizations for economic development services.
Brief Description: Revising provisions for contracts with associate development organizations for economic development services.
Sponsors: By Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Marr, Brown, Kilmer, Kauffman, Murray, Shin and Rasmussen; by request of Governor Gregoire).
Brief History:
Community & Economic Development & Trade: 3/21/07, 3/29/07 [DPA];
Appropriations: 3/31/07 [DPA(APP w/o CEDT)s].
Floor Activity:
Passed House - Amended: 4/9/07, 97-1.
Brief Summary of Second Substitute Bill (As Amended by House) |
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & TRADE
Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Kenney, Chair; Pettigrew, Vice Chair; Bailey, Ranking Minority Member; McDonald, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Chase, Darneille, Haler, Rolfes and P. Sullivan.
Staff: Tracey Taylor (786-7196).
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Majority Report: Do pass as amended by Committee on Appropriations and without amendment by Committee on Community & Economic Development & Trade. Signed by 31 members: Representatives Sommers, Chair; Dunshee, Vice Chair; Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Bailey, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Haler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Buri, Chandler, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Dunn, Ericks, Fromhold, Grant, Haigh, Hunt, Hunter, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Kretz, Linville, McDermott, McIntire, Morrell, Pettigrew, Priest, Schual-Berke, Seaquist and P. Sullivan.
Staff: Owen Rowe (786-7391).
Background:
Associate Development Organizations (ADOs) are under contract with the state to provide
economic development services in the communities they represent. In most areas, they are
known as Economic Development Councils or EDCs. There are currently 39 ADOs
providing economic development services in Washington under contract with the Department
of Community, Trade and Economic Development (DCTED).
Summary of Amended Bill:
Current statutory language is updated to reflect changes in the economic development
landscape. This includes eliminating the directive that the DCTED contract not only with
county designated ADOs, but also other local organizations. The DCTED is also directed to
consult with local governments, higher education institutions, workforce development
councils, labor groups, and other appropriate groups regarding the establishment of an
economic development delivery system.
The ADOs must provide direct assistance, including business planning, to companies who
need support to stay in business, expand or relocate to Washington from out of state or other
countries. The ADOs work with the appropriate partners, which may include local
governments, workforce development organizations, port districts, export assistance
providers, local colleges and universities, the Washington Manufacturing Services, small
business assistance programs and other federal, state and local programs to facilitate the
alignment of planning efforts and the seamless delivery of business support services in the
county.
In conjunction with other governmental jurisdictions and institutions, the ADOs must
participate in the development of a county-wide economic development plan consistent with
the state comprehensive plan for economic development developed by the Washington
Economic Development Commission. In addition, the ADOs must work with businesses on
site location and selection assistance. Also, the ADOs must provide information on state and
local permitting processes, tax issues and other essential information for operating,
expanding or locating a business in Washington. Further, the ADOs are tasked with
marketing the local area and the state as excellent locations to expand or locate a business.
In addition, the ADOs must participate in economic development systemwide discussions
regarding gaps in the delivery of business start-up assistance. The ADOs must also provide
business retention and expansion services.
The ADOs are directed to support regional economic research and regional planning efforts
to implement target industry strategies and other economic development strategies that
support increased living standards and increase foreign direct investment. This includes
participating in planning efforts involving combined strategies around workforce
development and economic development policies and programs. The ADOs must also
collect and report data as specified by the contract with the DCTED. The DCTED must
consult with the Washington State Economic Development Commission in the establishment
of such uniform data as is needed to conduct a statewide systemic analysis.
An ADO must submit an annual report to the DCTED. This report must include
employment, wages, tax revenue, and capital investment data. The DCTED and an ADO will
develop specific performance measures as part of the biennial contracting process. Once the
DCTED and an ADO agree on specific target levels, an annual comparison of the actual
performance and the targets shall be conducted. Failure to achieve targets in more than
one-half of the agreed measures triggers a remediation plan to address these performance
gaps. If an ADO fails to achieve the agreed upon progress in the remediation plan, the
ADO's contracts and state funding shall be terminated for one year. The ADO must
reorganize or take other steps to address the issues and may reapply for a contract after a one
year waiting period.
A funding formula, subject to appropriation, is established for urban and rural ADOs. If an
ADO is located in an urban county, they may receive a locally matched $0.90 per capita
allocation, up to $300,000 per organization, per year. If an ADO is located in a rural county,
they may receive a base allocation of $40,000 plus a locally matched $0.90 per capita
allocation.
Up to 5 ADOs under contract with the DCTED per year that apply for the Washington State
Quality Award or its equivalent shall be reimbursed for its application fee; however, an ADO
cannot receive the award more than once every three years. A null and void clause applies to
the bill.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: New fiscal note requested on April 2, 2007.
Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed. However, the bill is null and void if not funded in the budget.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: (Community & Economic Development & Trade)
(In support) This bill signifies a long overdue commitment to the state is economic
development and capacity building. Economic Development Councils (EDCs) generate jobs
and investment in our local communities. In 2006, EDCs created 18,000 jobs, $2.2 billion in
investment, and $128 million in revenues. With the limited amount of money dedicated to
economic development, we must be more innovative in how we use the scarce dollars. This
bill recognizes our local EDCs are poised to be more efficient and more accountable.
Moreover, this bill allows the EDCs to continue what they are doing: growing our local
entrepreneurial networks, assisting existing businesses, expanding businesses and
manufacturers and leveraging local investments. In addition, the new funding will allow for
the expansion of the recruitment and retention infrastructure in the state. The funding
formula in this version benefits our financially challenged rural EDCs. However, the House
bill had less requirements for the funding.
(Opposed) None.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: (Appropriations)
(In support) This bill has been referred to as one of the most important pieces of economic
development legislation that this Legislature has considered in the last 25 years by local
economic development professionals.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (Community & Economic Development & Trade) Senator Marr, prime sponsor; Marc Baldwin, Office of the Governor; James McMahan and Bruce Kendall, Washington Economic Development Association; Matt Matayoshi, Economic Development Council of Mason County; Michael Cade, Economic Development Council of Thurston County; Jim Hedrick, Spokane Area Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Council; and Bill Lotto, Lewis County Economic Development Council.
Persons Testifying: (Appropriations) James McMahan, Washington Economic Development Association.