HOUSE BILL REPORT
SSB 5190
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House:
April 5, 2007
Title: An act relating to the collection of legal financial obligations.
Brief Description: Modifying provisions relating to the collection of legal financial obligations.
Sponsors: By Senate Committee on Human Services & Corrections (originally sponsored by Senators Hargrove, McCaslin and Shin).
Brief History:
Judiciary: 3/20/07, 3/30/07 [DP].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 4/5/07, 97-0.
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 11 members: Representatives Lantz, Chair; Goodman, Vice Chair; Rodne, Ranking Minority Member; Warnick, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Ahern, Flannigan, Kirby, Moeller, Pedersen, Ross and Williams.
Staff: Edie Adams (786-7180).
Background:
When a defendant is convicted of a crime, the court may impose legal financial obligations as
part of the judgment and sentence. Financial obligations that may be imposed on a defendant
include: victim restitution; crime victims' compensation fees; court costs; court-appointed
attorneys' fees and costs of defense; fines; and other costs associated with the offense or
sentence.
An offender's compliance with legal financial obligations is supervised by the Department of
Corrections (DOC) during any period the offender is incarcerated or under the DOC
supervision after release, and then by the county clerk for the remaining period the offender is
under the jurisdiction of the court. The Sentencing Reform Act provides that the state and
the party to whom the legal financial obligation is owed may enforce the obligation in the
same manner as any other judgment in a civil action.
When an inmate of a state prison receives funds, the funds are subject to certain mandatory
deductions and priorities established in statute. These deductions vary depending on the
types of funds received. The deductions from funds received by an inmate from sources
other than wages or legal settlements or awards are:
Funds received by inmates from legal settlements or awards are subject to the following deductions:
When an inmate who is sentenced to death or to life imprisonment without the possibility of
release receives funds, including funds from a legal settlement or award, the funds are not
subject to the mandatory deductions for the inmate savings account or for the payment of
legal financial obligations. The DOC has a policy of imposing a 20 percent deduction for
legal financial obligations from the non-wage funds received by inmates who are sentenced to
death or to life imprisonment despite the fact that the mandatory deduction statute does not
list legal financial obligations as one of the mandatory deductions from these funds. The
DOC bases its authority to impose legal financial obligation deductions from these funds on
another provision of law governing an offender's responsibility for legal financial obligations
(Chapter 72.11 RCW). This chapter of law generally provides the DOC with authority to
disburse money from an inmate's personal account for the purpose of satisfying a
court-ordered legal financial obligation, as long as the disbursements do not reduce the
inmate's account below the level of indigency.
The DOC policy of imposing the 20 percent legal financial obligation deduction on non-wage
funds received by inmates sentenced to death or to life imprisonment was challenged by two
inmates sentenced to life imprisonment. In the case Anderson v. State, the Washington
Supreme Court upheld the DOC policy in a five to four decision. The majority reconciled the
two potentially conflicting statutes by finding that the mandatory deduction statute specifies a
list of mandatory deductions that the DOC must impose, while the chapter dealing with an
offender's responsibility for legal financial obligations grants the Secretary of the DOC the
discretionary authority to impose additional deductions for legal financial obligations.
Summary of Bill:
The deductions required for funds received by an inmate sentenced to death or life
imprisonment without possibility of release are expanded to include: a 20 percent deduction
for the payment of legal financial obligations from any funds, including legal settlements or
awards; and a 15 percent deduction for child support obligations from funds received from
legal settlements or awards.
The Secretary of the DOC is given authority to exempt an inmate from the requirement of an
inmate savings account if the inmate's earliest release date is beyond the inmate's life
expectancy.
A statement is made that nothing in the statute governing mandatory deductions from inmate
funds limits the authority of the county clerk or a restitution recipient from collecting against
an inmate's money, assets, or property.
The Department of Health may not charge a fee for providing a county clerk or court a
certified copy of a death certificate for an offender if the request is for the purpose of
extinguishing the offender's legal financial obligation.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) There are three important parts to this bill that will bring better consistency to
collection of legal financial obligations. First, the bill makes offenders sentenced to life
imprisonment or to death subject to the same deductions that apply to other inmates. There
are currently approximately 530 inmates who are sentenced to life imprisonment or death that
would be affected by this change. Second, the bill specifically empowers county clerks to
take collection action against an inmate's assets in order to collect legal financial obligations.
Finally, the bill exempts clerks from the $17 charge for certified copies of death certificates.
Law enforcement already has this exemption for keeping their sex offender records up-to-date.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Ruth Gordon, Washington Association of County Clerks.