Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Judiciary Committee | |
SSB 5910
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Title: An act relating to prefiling notice of intent to commence a medical malpractice action.
Brief Description: Modifying the notice requirement of intent to file a medical malpractice claim.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Judiciary (originally sponsored by Senators Brandland, Kline, Weinstein and Parlette).
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 3/27/07
Staff: Edie Adams (786-7180).
Background:
In 2006, the Legislature passed 2SHB 2292 which included a wide variety of issues relating to
medical malpractice, including medical malpractice civil actions. One of the changes in 2SHB
2292 relating to medical malpractice civil actions was the creation of a requirement for pre-suit
notice before an action may be commenced. The pre-suit notice requirement provides that a
medical malpractice action may not be commenced unless the plaintiff has provided the
defendant with 90 days prior notice of the intention to file a suit. If the pre-suit notice is served
within 90 days of the expiration of the statute of limitations, the statute of limitations is extended
for a period of 90 days from the service of the notice. The pre-suit notice provision does not
specify how service of the notice may be made, who the notice may be served on, nor how to
compute the running of the 90-day period.
Under court rule, when a notice or other document must be served on another party, the service
may be made by delivering a copy to the party or by mailing it to the party's last known address.
Service by mail is deemed complete upon the third day following the day upon which the
document is placed in the mail, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays. A different rule
applies to service of the summons and complaint. If the summons and complaint are authorized
to be served by mail, service is deemed complete on the date of mailing. There are three
authorized methods of proof of service by mail under court rules: by written acknowledgment of
service; by affidavit of the person who mailed the papers; or by certificate of an attorney.
A plaintiff filing suit against the state or a local governmental entity must comply with certain
notice requirements established in statute, called the "claim filing statute." A tort claim against
the state must be presented to and filed with the Risk Management Division of the Office of
Financial Management. A tort claim against a local governmental entity must be presented to an
agent designated by the local governmental entity to receive the claims. A claimant may not
commence a civil tort action against the state, or against a local governmental entity, until 60
days after the claim is presented to and filed with the governmental entity. The statute of
limitations for the claim is tolled during this 60-day period.
Summary of Bill:
The required 90-day pre-suit notice required before filing a medical malpractice action may be
provided by regular mail, registered mail, or certified mail with return receipt requested, by
depositing the notice, with postage prepaid, in the post office addressed to the defendant. Proof
of notice by mail is made in the same manner as under court rule for proof of service by mail.
Notice to a health care provider entity, or an agent or employee of the entity, may be addressed to
the chief executive officer, administrator, office of risk management, or registered agent for the
health care provider entity. Notice for a claim against a local government entity must be filed
with the agent designated by the local government for receiving tort claim filings.
If the notice is served within 90 days of the expiration of the statute of limitations, the time for
the commencement of the action will be extended 90 days from the date the notice was mailed.
After the 90 day extension passes, the claimant has an additional five court days to commence
the action.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.