Washington State House of Representatives |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Transportation Committee | |
ESSB 6120
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Addressing rail and freight infrastructure.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Transportation (originally sponsored by Senators Marr, Swecker, Oemig, Haugen, Rockefeller, Kauffman, Berkey, Murray, Spanel, Eide, Kilmer, Poulsen, Delvin, Regala, Jacobsen, Fraser, Kohl-Welles and Rasmussen).
Brief Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 3/26/07
Staff: Teresa Berntsen (786-7301).
Background:
Public funding for rail has historically been provided through a mix of state, federal, and local
funding. State funding is generally provided by the Legislature through programs administered
by the DOT and the FMSIB.
In the 2005-2007 Transportation Budget, the Legislature appropriated funds for the WSTC to
study the state's rail capacity and needs. The WSTC reported its findings to the Legislature in
December 2006 in the "Statewide Rail Capacity and System Needs Study" (study). The study
made several recommendations, including that the state should base its decision to participate in
rail projects on a systematic assessment of costs and benefits across users and modes, and that a
single entity should coordinate the state's participation in the rail transportation system.
Summary of Bill:
State funding for rail infrastructure improvements must be based on a cost/benefit analysis
developed by the DOT in consultation with a stakeholder workgroup, using the following
priorities: (1) economic, safety, or environmental advantages of freight movement by rail as
compared to alternative modes; (2) self-sustaining economic development that creates
family-wage jobs; (3) preservation of transportation corridors that would be otherwise lost; (4)
increased access to efficient and cost-effective transportation for agricultural and industrial
products; (5) better integration and cooperation within the regional, national, and international
systems of freight distribution; and (6) mitigation of impacts of increased rail traffic on
communities.
By August 1 each year, the FMSIB must submit its list of recommended projects to the DOT and
the WSTC. To the greatest extent possible, the FMSIB's recommended projects must be
consistent with the benefit/impact analysis developed by DOT and the stakeholder workgroup.
The DOT must develop and annually update a plan for state participation in rail infrastructure
improvements, considering recommendations from the WSTC and the list of projects submitted
by the FMSIB. The plan must be submitted to the WSTC and the transportation committees of
the Legislature on October 1 each year. The DOT must report changed circumstances that affect
the plan to the transportation committees of the Legislature by February 15 each year.
By December 15 each year, the WSTC must report to the transportation committees of the
Legislature its concurrence or disagreement with the DOT's rail infrastructure plan, including any
actions or projects recommended by the WSTC that are not in the DOT's plan.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.