Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Human Services Committee | |
SSB 6400
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Establishing programs for the moral guidance of incarcerated persons.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Human Services & Corrections (originally sponsored by Senator Carrell).
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/28/08
Staff: Linda Merelle (786-7092).
Background:
The Offender Re-entry bill passed during the 2007 legislative session was designed to prepare
offenders for re-entry to their communities by providing for education, substance abuse
treatment, and job training.
The DOC currently offers Moral Reconation Therapy (MRT) in five of its 15 correctional
facilities as part of their substance abuse treatment programs. The MRT, in general terms,
attempts to teach offenders why they should stay out of trouble and how they could go about
making decisions that would keep them out of trouble. The MRT emphasizes the transformation
of the individual's value structure. A goal of MRT is to shift an individual's set of priorities so
that they become committed to behavioral change.
Many courts have reviewed cases that challenged the programming models of correctional
facilities. These challenges have primarily been brought pursuant to the Establishment Clause of
the First Amendment, which prohibits mandatory participation in religion or its exercise.
Crucial to the ability to allow challenged, faith-based programs to continue are the requirements
that programs are voluntary and that no state funds are used for them. In a 2001 opinion, the
Washington Court of Appeals found that where there was both a religious-based and
non-religious-based option for a chemical dependency treatment program required by the DOC,
an offender could choose to participate in either program. If the offender failed to participate at
all, he or she could be sanctioned by the DOC.
Summary of Bill:
This bill (1) requires the DOC to establish an oversight committee to develop a comprehensive
interagency plan to provide voluntary, nondenominational moral and character-building
residential services for offenders who are incarcerated in prison and (2) sets forth the
qualifications and legal protections regarding defenses of claims for damages and from any
resulting judgments for chaplains appointed by the DOC, hired through contract, or who provide
their services on a volunteer basis.
Oversight Committee
This committee shall include representatives with decision-making authority from:
Interagency Plan
In developing this plan, the oversight committee shall seek from the public input on moral and
character-based residential programs in the state's adult correctional facilities. The public shall
include faith-based communities, state institutions of higher education, and the business
community.
The oversight committee shall develop the interagency plan by June 30, 2010. An interim report
is due to the Legislature by January 1, 2009.
The interagency plan must include:
Chaplains
Institutional chaplains shall be appointed as employees of the DOC and the Secretary of
Corrections may further contract with chaplains to meet the religious needs of inmates where
volunteer chaplains are not available. The appointed chaplains shall have qualifications
necessary to function as religious program coordinators for all faith groups represented within
the DOC. These qualifications shall be consistent with community standards of the given faith
group to which the chaplain belongs. A chaplain shall not be required to violate the tenets of his
or her faith when acting in an ecclesiastical role.
Chaplains, whether voluntary, contracted with, or employed by the DOC, may not be compelled
to carry personal liability insurance as a condition of carrying out his or her duties. Chaplains
may request that the Attorney General authorize the defense of an action or proceeding for
damages against the chaplain in the course of his or her duties. If a chaplain has been
represented by the Attorney General's office, any judgment awarded against the chaplain shall be
paid by the State.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 27, 2008.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.