Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Education Committee | |
SSB 6426
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Enacting the Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Early Learning & K-12 Education (originally sponsored by Senators Hobbs, Shin, Swecker, Rasmussen, Fairley, Berkey, Rockefeller, Eide, Schoesler, Fraser, Kauffman, Kohl-Welles and McAuliffe).
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 2/26/08
Staff: Cece Clynch (786-7195).
Background:
Interstate compacts are contracts between two or more states creating agreements on how to
address particular policy issues, setting standards, or establishing cooperation on regional or
national matters. Washington is a party to 22 interstate compacts. Most of these address
corrections issues, such as offender supervision and treatment of juveniles, and natural resource
issues, such as the Columbia Gorge, Pacific Fisheries, and radioactive waste disposal.
Washington has been a party to at least one education compact. Adopted in 1969, the Interstate
Agreement on Qualifications of Educational Personnel is codified in RCW 28A.690. Unlike
some other compacts, however, the agreement found in RCW 28A.690 is framed in discretionary
rather than mandatory terms and anticipates contract negotiation between the states. The
agreement provides that the Superintendent of Public Instruction "may" make one or more
contracts with other states providing for the acceptance of educational personnel and then only
with the approval of the specific text of the contract by the Professional Educator Standards
Board (PESB).
How compacts come to be varies. In some cases, interested states send delegates to a work
group to develop the compact terms. This might be down at the agency level or at the legislative
level. For example, HB 1038 (2007) established a task force with legislators and
Governor-appointed members to negotiate a compact on electrical transmission corridors.
The Military Children Compact was developed by a group that included the U.S. Department of
Defense, the U.S. Department of Education, national education associations, and representatives
of several states. Washington was not a participant in developing the Military Children Compact.
Washington is one of 16 states in which a measure has been introduced to adopt the Military
Children Compact. No states have adopted it as of this date.
Summary of Bill:
Washington enters into the Military Children Compact and agrees to its terms. It becomes
effective after ten states adopt it.
The purpose of the Military Children Compact is to remove barriers to educational success faced
by children of military families because of frequent moves and deployment of their parents. It
includes specific provisions with respect to four broad areas:
Once it becomes effective, an Interstate Commission is created and the Governor of each
member state appoints a single person to sit on the Commission. The powers of this
Commission include adoption of rules, establishment of an administrative office, receipt and
expenditure of funds, compliance enforcement, and dissemination of information. The aggregate
annual assessment amount shall be allocated based upon a formula to be determined by the
Commission, which shall adopt a rule binding upon all members.
There are provisions for filing for judicial review of rules adopted by the Commission. A
challenged rule remains in effect during the judicial review process unless the court finds that the
petitioner has a substantial likelihood of success. A majority of the Legislatures of the
compacting states may reject a rule by enactment of a statute or resolution, but this must be done
in the same manner as was used by that state to adopt the Military Children Compact in the first
place.
The Interstate Commission shall adopt rules providing for both mediation and binding arbitration
of disputes and shall attempt to resolve disputes that may arise between member states. The
Commission may also initiate legal action in the United States District Court for the District of
Columbia against a member state to enforce compliance. The relief may include both injunctive
relief and damages. In the event judicial enforcement is necessary, the prevailing party shall be
awarded costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.
A member state may withdraw from the Military Children Compact by means of a statute
repealing the compact, however, withdrawal shall not take effect until one year after the effective
date of the statute and written notice by the Governor to each other member state. Dissolution
occurs upon the date of withdrawal of the member state that reduces the membership to just one
state.
All member states' laws which conflict with the Military Children Compact are superseded to the
extent of the compact. Within the bill are specific amendments to several Washington statutes so
as to provide for exceptions for students subject to the Military Children Compact to the extent
that the laws conflict. These include laws relating to:
There are also some technical changes to statutes being amended, such as changing the reference to "Advanced Placement" to "AP".
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available on original bill.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.